NON-CHEMICAL APPROACHES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ...

Table 25. Effect of spraying botanicals at different intervals on chrysoperla population in late sown sorghum
Treatments 3 6 9 12 3, 6 3, 6,
9
Azagro 5%
NSKE 5%
Plant mixture
5%
Endosulfan
35 EC
(0.05%)
Mean
1.59
(1.61)
1.67
(1.63)
1.57
(1.60)
1.63
(1.62)
1.62
(1.62)
1.66
(1.63)
1.67
(1.63)
1.61
(1.62)
1.60
(1.61)
1.64
(1.62)
1.44
(1.56)
1.45
(1.57)
1.63
(1.62)
1.60
(1.61)
1.53
(1.59)
1.50
(1.58)
1.59
(1.61)
1.68
(1.64)
1.60
(1.61)
1.59
(1.61)
1.51
(1.58)
1.52
(1.59)
1.67
(1.63)
1.59
(1.61)
1.57
(1.60)
Spraying interval (DAE)
1.58
(1.60)
1.58
(1.60)
1.52
(1.59)
1.41
(1.55)
1.52
(1.59)
3,6,9,12 3, 9 3, 12 6, 9 6, 9,
12
Number of chrysoperla per plant
1.57
(1.58)
1.50
(1.58)
1.51
(1.58)
1.40
(1.55)
1.47
(1.57)
*Figures in parentheses are √ x + 1 transformed values.
Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.05) by DMRT
DAE – Days After Emergence
SEm± CD at 5% Source
0.01
0.01
0.04
NS
NS
NS
Between two treatments
Between two spraying intervals
Interaction between treatments and spraying intervals
1.53
(1.59)
1.67
(1.63)
1.68
(1.64)
1.59
(1.61)
1.61
(1.62)
1.68
(1.64)
1.67
(1.63)
1.49
(1.58)
1.49
(1.58)
1.58
(1.61)
1.53
(1.59)
1.48
(1.57)
1.49
(1.58)
1.50
(1.58)
1.50
(1.58)
1.49
(1.58)
1.54
(1.59)
1.55
(1.59)
1.42
(1.56)
1.50
(1.58)
6, 12 9, 12 Untreated
control
1.69
(1.64)
1.61
(1.62)
1.59
(1.61)
1.51
(1.58)
1.60
(1.61)
1.51
(1.58)
1.55
(1.59)
1.55
(1.59)
1.48
(1.57)
1.52
(1.59)
1.60
(1.61)
1.63
(1.62)
1.63
(1.62)
1.62
(1.62)
1.62
(1.62)
Mean
1.61
(1.62)
1.60
(1.61)
1.50
(1.60)
1.61
(1.62)
1.64
(1.62)