03.06.2013 Views

draft of November 2011

draft of November 2011

draft of November 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

. belle lo sono?<br />

beautiful it are<br />

Beautiful they are.<br />

In sum then, the hypothesis that D is the nominalisor in Italian while Greek nominals<br />

are NumPs can account for the rich inventory <strong>of</strong> D elements in Italian as well as the weaker<br />

definite semantics <strong>of</strong> D elements in this language.<br />

4.2 Indefinite Argument Drop and Bare Subnominal Ellipsis<br />

As Giannakidou and Merchant (1997) show, Greek Indefintie Argument Drop (IAD) in-<br />

volves recycling <strong>of</strong> the descriptive content <strong>of</strong> the antecedent (or property anaphora in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> Tomioka 2003).Crucially, it does not pick the discourse referent <strong>of</strong> the antecedent. 26 Con-<br />

sider (69). Example (69a) does not allow a reading in which Nafsika dried the dishes Napoleo-<br />

das washed, a reading available in (69b) where the pronoun is used. On the basis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

obligatoriness <strong>of</strong> the disjoint reading in (69a), Giannakidou and Merchant (1997) conclude<br />

that an empty pro analysis, proposed by Dimitriadis (1994) is not possible, since it would<br />

predict the co-referential reading in (69b). What IAD involves in (69a) is the recycling <strong>of</strong><br />

the descriptive content <strong>of</strong> the antecedent, i.e. piata but not the specific set introduced by the<br />

antecedent.<br />

(69) a. o Napoleodas epline piata ke i Nafsika skupise<br />

the-nom Napoleodas-nom washed-3sg dishes and the-nom Nafsika dried-sg<br />

Napoleon washed dishes and Nafsika dried dishes. (Disjoint reading)<br />

26 See Giannakidou and Merchant (1997) for a detailed discussion <strong>of</strong> the properties <strong>of</strong> IAD. Panagiotidis<br />

(2002) excludes a VP-ellips analysis <strong>of</strong> the phenomenon; his main argument is that all restrictions relevant to<br />

IAD involve the nominal antecedent and never any verbal element. Further, examples like (i), where only the<br />

object is dropped but other parts <strong>of</strong> the VP are overt indicate that what is dropped is just the object.<br />

(i) ti mia mera vrike dulia o Yorgos stu Zografu ke to epomeno proi<br />

the one day found-3sg job the-nom Yorgos-nom at-the Zografu and the next morning<br />

vrike i Maria stin Kesariani<br />

found-3sg the-nom Maria at-the Kesariani<br />

One day Yorgos found a job at Zografu and the next morning Maria found one at Kesariani.<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!