Unusual Causes of Stroke - Hypercoagulable States and their work-up
Unusual Causes of Stroke - Hypercoagulable States and their work-up
Unusual Causes of Stroke - Hypercoagulable States and their work-up
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Unusual</strong> <strong>Causes</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Stroke</strong><br />
John EE. Greenlee Greenlee, M.D. M D<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Utah Health Sciences Center<br />
George Geo ge E. . Wahlen W e VAHSC V SC<br />
Salt Lake City, Utah
DDisclosure l<br />
• Associate Editor for Medlink<br />
• Consultant for “Best Doctors in<br />
America”<br />
• Reviewer for Merck Manual<br />
• CConsultant: lt t Perseid P id<br />
Pharmaceutical Company<br />
• Unlabeled use <strong>of</strong> product:<br />
p<br />
none
TTopics to CCover<br />
• Anticardiolipin antibody syndromes<br />
• Hereditary y factors associated with stroke<br />
– Factor V (Leiden) mutation<br />
– Protein C <strong>and</strong> Protein S deficiency<br />
– AAnti ti thrombin th bi III activity ti it<br />
– Lipoprotein a<br />
• Sickle cell disease <strong>and</strong> sickle cell trait<br />
• Cerebral vasospasm / stroke associated with<br />
methamphetamine p<br />
<strong>and</strong> cocaine abuse
Anticardiolipin Antibody Syndromes
Anticardiolipin Antibodies: History<br />
• 1952: Conley et al<br />
– “AA hemorrhagic disorder caused by circulating<br />
anticoagulant in patients with disseminated<br />
l<strong>up</strong>us p erythematosus”<br />
y<br />
– Usually no hemorrhagic complications unless<br />
hypothrombinemia or thrombocytopenia<br />
• Association with false-positive VDRL
Anticardiolipin Antibodies: History<br />
• 1964: Bowie:<br />
– Association <strong>of</strong> l<strong>up</strong>us p anticoagulant g <strong>and</strong> antibodies to<br />
cardiolipin with venous thrombosis<br />
• 1972: “l<strong>up</strong>us anticoagulant”<br />
• 1983: First anticardiolipin antibody test<br />
• Subsequent association <strong>of</strong> anticardiolipin<br />
antibodies <strong>and</strong> l<strong>up</strong>us anticoagulant with stroke <strong>and</strong><br />
other conditions
Antiphospholipid Antibody<br />
Syndrome<br />
• Is a syndrome, not a specific disease entity<br />
– Defined (by committee) on the basis <strong>of</strong> both<br />
clinical <strong>and</strong> immunological parameters<br />
– The definition probably does not cover the full<br />
spectrum <strong>of</strong> disease<br />
• Is a disease blessed (or cursed) by eponyms<br />
– Hughes syndrome, Asherton syndrome,<br />
Sneddon syndrome
Antiphospholipid Antibody<br />
Syndrome<br />
Clinical<br />
• One or more episodes <strong>of</strong><br />
confirmed thrombosis<br />
– Arteries<br />
– Veins<br />
– Small vessels<br />
• Pregnancy morbidity <strong>and</strong><br />
ffetal ll loss<br />
Immunological<br />
• Serum anticardiolipin<br />
antibody <strong>of</strong> high titer<br />
– IgG or IgM isotype in blood<br />
– On 2 or more occasions, occasions at<br />
least 6 weeks apart<br />
• Prolonged<br />
antiphospholipid-<br />
ti h h li id<br />
dependent coagulation<br />
– L<strong>up</strong>us anticoagulant
Antiphospholipid Antibody<br />
Syndrome<br />
• Clinical manifestations are multifaceted<br />
• Serological tests are problematical<br />
– Antigenic targets still not completely understood<br />
– Difficulties with st<strong>and</strong>ardization among laboratories<br />
• Animal models provide information, but no<br />
animal model as yet d<strong>up</strong>licates human disease
AAntiphospholipid h h l dA Antibodies b d<br />
• Can be found in 2-12% <strong>of</strong> normal individuals<br />
– Incidence increases with age g<br />
– May be transient (e.g. with infectious mononucleosis)<br />
• Not all are pathogenic<br />
– ACA type A antibodies bind to β2 glycoprotein 1 to<br />
procoagulant lipid surfaces <strong>and</strong> are thought to be<br />
pathogenic<br />
– ACA type B antibodies: do not bind <strong>and</strong> are not<br />
pathogenic p g
Antiphospholipid Antibody<br />
Syndromes<br />
• Primary antiphospholipid antibody<br />
syndrome<br />
• Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome<br />
associated with other conditions<br />
– SLE, rheumatoid arthritis, other autoimmune<br />
disorders
Antiphospholipid Antibodies: A<br />
Conceptual Challenge<br />
• Antiphospholipid antibodies<br />
– Anticardiolipin p ( (aCL) )<br />
– Antibodies to β2 glycoprotein 1 (β2GP1)<br />
– L<strong>up</strong>us p anticoagulant g ( (LA) )<br />
– Others<br />
• These antibodies do not recognize g the same<br />
antigenic epitopes<br />
– Can be found together or independently
Antiphospholipid Antibodies: A<br />
Conceptual Challenge<br />
• IgG, IgM antibodies all most commonly<br />
studied<br />
– IgM sometimes considered an acute phase<br />
reactant unrelated to actual clinical pathology<br />
– IgA discounted (<strong>and</strong> not tested) in some studies<br />
• However However, cases exist with either IgM<br />
antibodies in isolation or IgA antibodies in<br />
isolation
Antibody Targets in Antiphospholipid<br />
Antibody Syndrome<br />
• L<strong>up</strong>us anticoagulant<br />
• Cardiolipin(s)<br />
• Beta(2)-glycoprotein 1<br />
• Phosphatidylserine<br />
• Prothrombin<br />
• Activated protein C<br />
• Tissue plasminogen<br />
activator<br />
• Plasmin<br />
• Annexin A2, A5<br />
• Protein Z<br />
• Other platelet <strong>and</strong><br />
endothelial antigens<br />
• And more besides<br />
– Neurons<br />
– Astrocyes y
Antiphospholipid Antibodies: A<br />
Conceptual Challenge<br />
• Antigenic targets not completely understood<br />
– Some antibodies reported are likely<br />
epiphenomena<br />
– Some pathogenic antibodies may not be any <strong>of</strong><br />
the above<br />
• Some patients may have none <strong>of</strong> these<br />
antibodies yet still have typical clinical<br />
manifestations (e.g. (e g Sneddon syndrome)
Anticardiolipin Antibody<br />
Syndromes: Pathogenesis<br />
Espinosa: Arthritis Research 2008
Antiphospholipid Antibodies: Major<br />
Effects<br />
• Platelet aggregation<br />
• Circulating fibrin-platelet aggregates<br />
• Circulating immune complex aggregates<br />
• Thrombus formation
Anticardiolipin Antibody<br />
Syndromes: Mechanisms <strong>of</strong> Injury<br />
• Vascular occlusion (Large or small vessel)<br />
– Arteries<br />
– Veins<br />
– Placental vessels<br />
• Platelet-fibrin emboli microvascular infarcts<br />
• Possibly a two-stage process<br />
– Anticardiolipin antibody-mediated injury may require<br />
prior vascular injury
Antiphospholipid Antibodies:<br />
Associated Systemic Diseases<br />
• Syndrome <strong>of</strong> recurrent fetal loss<br />
• Recurrent peripheral p p venous thrombosis<br />
• Cutaneous changes, esp. livedo reticularis<br />
• Systemic arterial thrombosis<br />
– Myocardial infarction / stent failure<br />
– Renal failure<br />
– Addison’s disease<br />
• Cardiac valvular abnormalities <strong>and</strong> marantic<br />
endocarditis e doca d t s
Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome:<br />
Described CNS Complications<br />
• <strong>Stroke</strong><br />
• Transient ischemic attack<br />
• Amaurosis fugax<br />
• Cerebral venous sinus<br />
thrombosis<br />
• Ocular ischemia<br />
• Acute ischemic<br />
encephalopathy<br />
• Multi-infarct dementia<br />
– May involve micro-infarcts<br />
• Seizures<br />
• Cognitive impairment<br />
• Optic atrophy<br />
• Transverse myelopathy<br />
– Esp. sp. wwith t SSLE<br />
• Multiple-sclerosis-like<br />
disease<br />
• Ch Chorea<br />
• Migraine<br />
• Psychiatric y<br />
disturbances
Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome:<br />
Major Cerebrovascular Complications<br />
• <strong>Stroke</strong> / TIA<br />
• Cortical vein or venous sinus occlusion<br />
• Retinal venous or arterial occlusion<br />
• Progressive cognitive decline without<br />
obvious stroke
MMayer et t al l Clin Cli Neurol N l Neurosurge N 2010;112:602-8<br />
2010 112 602 8
SSneddon dd syndrome d<br />
• Antiphospholipid<br />
antibodies<br />
• <strong>Stroke</strong><br />
– Brain, spinal cord, or<br />
retinal events<br />
• Livedo reticularis
Catastrophic Antiphospholipid<br />
(Asherton’s) Syndrome<br />
• ~1% <strong>of</strong> cases<br />
• Widespread microvascular thromboses in<br />
the presence <strong>of</strong> antiphospholipid antibodies<br />
• High rate <strong>of</strong> mortality: 30 30-50% 50%<br />
• Considered an indication for<br />
immunos<strong>up</strong>pression<br />
– However, no good controlled trials<br />
– No proven immunos<strong>up</strong>pressive regimen
Antiphospholipid Antibody <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>Stroke</strong>: Physical Findings
Serological Diagnosis:<br />
L<strong>up</strong>us Anticoagulant<br />
• Inhibit phospholipid-dependent coagulation<br />
reactions<br />
• Characteristics <strong>of</strong> test<br />
– Prolonged aPTT<br />
– Nt Not corrected tdb by mixing ii with ithnormal lplatelet-poor ltlt<br />
plasma<br />
– Shortening/correction <strong>of</strong> the prolonged coagulation<br />
time by excess phospholipids<br />
– Exclusion <strong>of</strong> other coagulopathies, eg, factor VIII<br />
inhibitor or heparin p
Serological Diagnosis:<br />
Anticardiolipin Antibody Titers<br />
IgG IgM IgA<br />
Normal 1-15 units 1-10 units 1-14 units<br />
LLow positive iti 16 16-40 40 units it 11 11-20 20 units it 15 15-40 40 units it<br />
Moderate positive 41-80 units 21-40 units 41-80 units<br />
High positive >80 units >40 units >80 units
Antiphospholipid Antibody<br />
Syndrome: Treatment<br />
• Antiplatelet therapy<br />
– Clearly ineffective in many patients<br />
• AAnticoagulation ti l ti<br />
• INR 2-3<br />
• INR 3-4<br />
• IImmunos<strong>up</strong>pressive i treatment<br />
– Prednisone<br />
– IVIgG / Plasma exchange<br />
– Cyclophosphamide (may not affect antibody titers)<br />
– Rituximab<br />
• Only y<br />
limited data from controlled trials
Treatment
Catastrophic Anticardiolipin<br />
Antibody Syndrome: Treatment<br />
Espinosa: Arthritis Research 2008
PPossible bl New N Treatments<br />
T
Anticardiolipin Antibody Syndrome:<br />
Unanswered Questions<br />
• To what extent should therapy be individualized?<br />
• How does one monitor treatment effect?<br />
• Should one begin treatment with platelet inhibitors?<br />
• If one needs to use warfarin, what INR?<br />
– Anticoagulation t coagu at o to INR N 3-4.5 3 .5 not ot shown s ow s<strong>up</strong>erior s<strong>up</strong>e o in co controlled t o ed<br />
trials<br />
– INR <strong>of</strong> 3-4 increased risk <strong>of</strong> hemorrhage<br />
• At what point should one use immunos<strong>up</strong>pression?<br />
• Which immunos<strong>up</strong>pressive regimen should one use?
Hereditary Disorders <strong>of</strong> Coagulation
“He’s had a stroke. We need to order<br />
a hypercoagulable panel”<br />
-Neurology Neurology resident
Hereditary Abnormalities <strong>of</strong> Clotting<br />
Factors<br />
• Factor V Leiden<br />
• Prothrombin 20210A<br />
• Antithrombin III<br />
• Protein C deficiency<br />
• Protein S deficiency
Hereditary Abnormalities <strong>of</strong> Clotting<br />
Factors<br />
• Association with deep venous<br />
thrombophlebitis well established<br />
• Significant in cerebral vein / venous sinus<br />
thrombosis<br />
• Significance in arterial stroke not well<br />
established<br />
tblihd
Factor V Leiden <strong>and</strong> Deficiencies <strong>of</strong><br />
Protein C, Protein S, Antithrombin III<br />
• Factor V Leiden<br />
– Mutation <strong>of</strong> factor V<br />
– Prevents cleavage <strong>of</strong> factor V by activated<br />
protein C<br />
– Present in <strong>up</strong> to 9% <strong>of</strong> individuals<br />
– Important in venous occlusion<br />
• 20% <strong>of</strong> individuals with initial DVT<br />
• 60% <strong>of</strong> o individuals d v du s with w recurrent ecu e DVT V
Factor V Leiden <strong>and</strong> Deficiencies <strong>of</strong><br />
Protein C, Protein S, Antithrombin III<br />
• Protein C, Protein S, Antithrombin III<br />
deficiencies<br />
– Less common than factor V Leiden<br />
– Association with DVT<br />
– Protein C <strong>and</strong> protein S deficiency: association<br />
with s<strong>up</strong>erficial thrombophlebitis
Inherited Thrombophilia <strong>and</strong> <strong>Stroke</strong><br />
Risk<br />
Protein C Protein S Antithrombin III<br />
Asymptomatic controls 0.14-0.5% 0.1% 0.02-0.2%<br />
Unselected patients 3.2% 2.2% 1.1%<br />
with venous thrombosis<br />
Patients with familial 4.9% 5.1% 4.2%<br />
venous thrombosis: 4.2%<br />
Patients with<br />
ischemic stroke<br />
14% 1.4% 09% 0.9% 52% 5.2%<br />
Hankey et al: <strong>Stroke</strong>, 2001
Inherited Thrombophilia <strong>and</strong> <strong>Stroke</strong><br />
Risk<br />
Factor V Leiden Prothrombin 20210A<br />
Asymptomatic controls 3%-6% 1-2%<br />
Unselected patients 19% 6.3%%<br />
with venous thrombosis<br />
Patients with familial 46% 18%<br />
venous thrombosis: 4.2%<br />
Patients with<br />
ischemic stroke<br />
46% 4.6% 37% 3.7%<br />
Hankey et al: <strong>Stroke</strong>, 2001
Inherited Thrombophilia <strong>and</strong> <strong>Stroke</strong><br />
Risk: Lipoprotein a<br />
• Identified in some studies as an independent risk<br />
factor<br />
– Myocardial infarction<br />
– Atherothrombotic stroke in young adults<br />
• Elevated levels reported in 27% <strong>of</strong> children with<br />
stroke<br />
• Jones et al: associated with large large-artery artery<br />
atherosclerotic stroke<br />
– But not small artery occlusive stroke (Clinical<br />
Ch Chemistry. i t 2009 2009;55:1888-1890<br />
55 1888 1890
Lipoprotein a<br />
• Potentially useful for risk stratification in primary<br />
<strong>and</strong> secondary yp prevention<br />
– Significance in the individual less certain<br />
• Not proven if reduction in lipoprotein a decreases<br />
stroke risk<br />
– Lack <strong>of</strong> well-tolerated <strong>and</strong> effective agents<br />
• Not known whether lipoprotein a stroke risk can<br />
be addressed by treating other vascular risk factors
RRare <strong>Causes</strong> C <strong>of</strong> f <strong>Stroke</strong> S k<br />
• Factors VIII, IX, XI, XII<br />
• Antiphosphatidylethanolamine<br />
• (Plasinogen Inhibitor - 1)<br />
• (Tissue Plasminogen activator, antigen<br />
• Plasminogin g
Screening for Coagulopathies:<br />
Whom to Screen<br />
•
Screening for Coagulopathies:<br />
Whom to Screen<br />
• L<strong>up</strong>us anticoagulant<br />
• Anticardiolipin antibody<br />
• Protein C, S, antithrombin III<br />
• Lipoprotein a<br />
• Factor V Leiden<br />
– Functional assay for activated protein C<br />
resistance
Sickle Cell Disease <strong>and</strong> Trait
SSickle kl Cell C ll Hemoglobin H l b<br />
• Point mutation: valine<br />
for glutamic acid<br />
– Position 6,<br />
hemoglobin B chain<br />
• If homozygous: sickle<br />
cell disease:<br />
– Hemoglobin SS<br />
• If heterozygous: sickle<br />
cell trait<br />
– HHemoglobin l bi SA
SSickle kl Cell C ll Hemoglobin H l b<br />
Hydrophobic region on<br />
hemoglobin g B chain<br />
<br />
Agglutination gg <strong>of</strong> B chains<br />
<br />
Sickling
SSickle kl Cell C ll Trait T <strong>and</strong> dD Disease<br />
• Sickle cell trait<br />
– Approximately 2 million individuals in U.S.A. U S A<br />
• Sickle cell disease<br />
– EEstimated ti t d72 72,000 000i individuals di id l<br />
– 1 in 500 African Americans<br />
– Only l about b 30% <strong>of</strong> fi individuals di id l have h<br />
symptomatic disease
Sickle Cell Disease<br />
• Presentation early in life<br />
• Hemolytic anemia<br />
• “Vaso-occlusive crises”<br />
– Extremities, bones, <strong>and</strong> viscera (e.g. spleen)<br />
• Bacterial infections<br />
• Acute chest syndrome: pulmonary edema,<br />
etc.
S<strong>Stroke</strong> k in Sickle S kl Cell C ll Disease D<br />
• Prevalence: 0.5-1% per<br />
year<br />
– 11% by 20 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />
– Compared to 2.5/100,000<br />
for children w/o sickle cell<br />
disease<br />
• May be overt or silent<br />
– Not usually preceded by<br />
TIA<br />
– May follow acute chest<br />
syndrome
S<strong>Stroke</strong> k in Sickle S kl Cell C ll Disease D<br />
• Usually ischemic (70-80%<br />
<strong>of</strong> cases)<br />
• Usually thrombotic<br />
• Intimal hyperplasia <br />
arterial t i lstenosis t i<br />
– Possible roles for decreased<br />
protein p C/S, , other factors<br />
• Rarely due to fat<br />
embolism<br />
Silva: <strong>Stroke</strong> 2009
S<strong>Stroke</strong> k in Sickle S kl Cell C ll Disease D<br />
• Usually anterior<br />
circulation<br />
– Distal ICA<br />
– Proximal ACA<br />
– Proximal MCA<br />
• Usually distal to posterior<br />
communicating i i artery<br />
Silva: <strong>Stroke</strong> 2009
<strong>Stroke</strong> in Sickle Cell Disease: Other<br />
Presentations<br />
• PRES<br />
• Moyamoya disease<br />
• Cerebral hemorrhage<br />
– Older patients<br />
– Aneurysm r<strong>up</strong>ture<br />
– Moyamoya vessels<br />
– Veins
Sickle Cell Trait: MRI in Children<br />
SSteen et al, l Radiology R di l 2003; 2003 228:208–215<br />
228 208 215
Sickle Cell Disease <strong>and</strong> Trait:<br />
Diagnosis<br />
• Consider hemoglobinopathy in African-American<br />
(or Mediterranean) patients with stroke<br />
– HHemoglobin l bi electrophoresis<br />
l t h i<br />
• CT / CTA, MR / MRA<br />
• Angiography<br />
– Especially in hemorrhage, to exclude vascular<br />
malformation<br />
– Safe if hemoglobin S < 30% <strong>of</strong> total hemoglobin<br />
• TCD: major role in assessing need for <strong>and</strong><br />
response to therapy in children
SSickle kl Cell C ll Disease: D Treatment T<br />
• Most experience is with stroke in children<br />
• TPA: no controlled studies, very yfew case reports p<br />
• Major treatment in children blood transfusion plus<br />
hydration<br />
– Efficacy <strong>of</strong> simple transfusion versus exchange not<br />
established<br />
– Exchange g possibly p ymore effective acutely y<strong>and</strong><br />
in<br />
decreasing likelihood <strong>of</strong> stroke (Hulbert 2006)<br />
– Goal (children) to reduce hemoglobin S to
SSickle kl Cell C ll Disease: D STOP Trials T l<br />
STOP 1<br />
• TCD as major monitoring<br />
tool<br />
– TCD velocities <strong>of</strong> 200<br />
cm/sec. known to indicate<br />
high stroke risk<br />
• Children with TCD mean<br />
blood flow velocities <strong>of</strong><br />
200 cm/second<br />
r<strong>and</strong>omized to either<br />
– Regular blood transfusions<br />
– No transfusion.<br />
• 90% reduction d ti in i first fi t<br />
stroke with transfusion.<br />
STOP2<br />
• Discontinuing<br />
transfusions after 30<br />
months or more<br />
reversion reversion to abnormal<br />
TCD values <strong>and</strong> stroke
Sickle Cell Disease: Other<br />
Treatments<br />
• Hydroxyurea<br />
– Increases hemoglobin g F<br />
– Diminishes painful crises<br />
– Role in stroke not known<br />
• Stem cell transplantation<br />
• Aspirin or other platelet inhibitors:<br />
recommended by some clinicians, no<br />
controlled data
Sickle Cell Disease: Surgical<br />
Treatment<br />
• EC/IC bypass<br />
• Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis<br />
YYoon et al l AJR 2000
Complications <strong>of</strong> Sickle Cell Trait<br />
• Probable<br />
– Venous thromboembolic events, fetal loss, neonatal<br />
ddeaths, h <strong>and</strong> dpreeclampsia l i<br />
• Possible<br />
– Acute chest syndrome syndrome, asymptomatic bacteriuria, bacteriuria<br />
anemia in pregnancy<br />
• Insufficient evidence:<br />
– Retinopathy, cholelithiasis, priapism, leg ulcers, liver<br />
necrosis, avascular necrosis <strong>of</strong> the femoral head, stroke<br />
Tsaras et al Am J Med 2009;122:507-12
<strong>Stroke</strong> in Sickle Cell Disease <strong>and</strong><br />
Trait: Possible Risk Factors<br />
• Exertion / dehydration<br />
– Usually associated with collapse <strong>and</strong> sudden<br />
death (rare)<br />
• High altitude<br />
• Sleep apnea
Reversible Cerebral Vasospasm<br />
<strong>Stroke</strong> Following Substance Abuse
Reversible Cerebral Vasospasm<br />
Syndrome<br />
• Severe headaches<br />
– With or without other<br />
neurological symptoms<br />
• Characteristic<br />
angiographic findings<br />
– “String <strong>of</strong> beads”<br />
• Spontaneous<br />
resolution in 1-3<br />
months<br />
Ducros et al Brain 2007;130:3091-3101
Reversible Cerebral Vasospasm<br />
Syndrome: Not a New Condition<br />
• 1978: “Isolated benign cerebral vasculitis” asc litis”<br />
• 1985: “Benign acute cerebral vasculopathy”<br />
• 1984: Migrainous vasospasm”<br />
• 1988: “Call-Fleming Syndrome”<br />
• 1993: “Migraine angiitis<br />
• 1995: “Drug-induced Drug induced angiopathy angiopathy”<br />
• 1999: “CNS pseudovasculitis”<br />
• 1999: “Postpartum angiopathy”<br />
• 1999: “Thunderclap Thunderclap headache with reversible vasospasm<br />
• 2001: “Benign angiopathy <strong>of</strong> the central nervous system<br />
• 2003: “Primary thunderclap headache<br />
• 2005 2005: “Drug-induced “D id dangiopathy” i h”
Reversible Cerebral Vasospasm<br />
Syndrome: Precipitating Factors<br />
• Postpartum states<br />
• Exposure to drugs, drugs alcohol, alcohol medications,<br />
medications<br />
blood products<br />
• Ct Catecholamine-secreting hl i ti tumors t<br />
• Other conditions
Reversible Cerebral Vasospasm<br />
Syndrome: Associated Agents<br />
• Illicit drugs<br />
– Cannabis, , cocaine, , ecstasy, y, amphetamines, p , LSD<br />
• Binge alcohol drinking (usually in combination<br />
with use <strong>of</strong> vasoactive substances<br />
• SSRIs<br />
• Nasal decongestants g<br />
– Phenylpropanolamine, pseudoephrine, ephedrine
Reversible Cerebral Vasospasm<br />
Syndrome: Associated Agents<br />
• Ergotamine agents<br />
– Ergotamine tartrate, tartrate methergine methergine, bromocriptine,<br />
bromocriptine<br />
lisuride, sumatriptan, isomethoptine<br />
• Misc Misc. agents:<br />
– Tacrolimus, cyclophosphamide, erythropoietin,<br />
IVIgG IVIgG, interferon alpha, alpha blood transfusions transfusions,<br />
nicotine patches, oral contraceptives, other<br />
hormonal treatments
Reversible Cerebral Vasospasm<br />
Syndrome: Associated Conditions<br />
• Hypercalcemia<br />
• Porphyria<br />
• Spinal subdural hematoma<br />
• Postcarotid endarterectomy<br />
• Neurosurgical procedures<br />
• Cervical artery dissection<br />
• Unr<strong>up</strong>tured cerebral saccular aneurysm<br />
• Cerebral artery dysplasia
Reversible Cerebral Vasospasm<br />
Syndrome: Precipitating Factors<br />
• Spontaneous: 37%<br />
• Peripartum: 12%<br />
– During spinal anesthesia using epinephrine<br />
– Early postpartum (4-11 days)<br />
• Associated with use <strong>of</strong> vasoactive substances:<br />
62%<br />
– May involve use <strong>of</strong> more than one agent<br />
Ducros et al Brain 2007;130:3091-3101<br />
2007;130:3091 3101
Reversible Cerebral Vasospasm<br />
Syndrome: Symptoms<br />
• Hallmark: recurrent thunderclap headache<br />
over a few days y to 2 weeks<br />
– Only symptom in 76% <strong>of</strong> cases<br />
– Can be single instead <strong>of</strong> repeating<br />
• Focal neurological deficits or seizures in<br />
24% <strong>of</strong> cases<br />
– Transient: esp. visual<br />
– Persistent
Reversible Cerebral Vasospasm<br />
Syndrome: Vascular Imaging<br />
• Vasospasm on MRA or angiography<br />
• Increased velocity on TCD<br />
– Including patients with normal MRA)<br />
• MMultifocal l if lsegmental l vasoconstriction i i on<br />
catheter angiogram<br />
– Including patients with normal MRA or TCD<br />
• Cervical (esp. vertebral) artery dissection
Reversible Cerebral Vasospasm<br />
Syndrome: Brain imaging<br />
• Subarachnoid<br />
hemorrhage g<br />
• <strong>Stroke</strong><br />
• PRES<br />
Ducros et al Brain 2007;130:3091-3101
Bartinsky, AJNR 2008;29:447-55
Reversible Cerebral Vasospasm<br />
Syndrome: Treatment<br />
• D/C vasoactive medications<br />
• Nimodipine: no controlled data<br />
– Intra-arterial<br />
– IIntravenous t<br />
– Oral<br />
• Milrinone<br />
• Intravenous prostacycline
Reversible Cerebral Vasospasm<br />
Syndrome: Outcome<br />
• Resolution in most patients<br />
• Persistent headache in some patients<br />
• Persistent neurological deficits<br />
• Post-stroke epilepsy
<strong>Stroke</strong> Following Substance Abuse
<strong>Stroke</strong> Following Substance Abuse<br />
• Substance abuse not a new problem<br />
– Early y1900s: approximately pp y1/400<br />
Americans were<br />
addicted to opiates<br />
– Use <strong>of</strong> cocaine <strong>and</strong> stimulant amines widespread<br />
• In some ways difficult to assess<br />
– Not all drug abusers tell the truth<br />
– Idiid Individuals l use different diff names for f different diff drugs d<br />
– Tainted or adulterated compounds are common
<strong>Stroke</strong> Following Substance Abuse<br />
• May be caused by<br />
– The actual drug<br />
– Other agents in the drug<br />
mixture<br />
– Adulterants (talc, etc)<br />
– Drug-associated endocarditis<br />
or other infections
Illicit Drugs Associated with <strong>Stroke</strong>
Cocaine<br />
• Usually cause stroke in minutes to hours after use<br />
– Rarely ydelayed y <strong>up</strong> pto<br />
one week<br />
• Cocaine hydrochloride<br />
– 80% <strong>of</strong> strokes are hemorrhagic<br />
– Roughly 50% are associated with aneurysm or AVM<br />
• Alkaloidal cocaine<br />
– 50% <strong>of</strong> strokes are hemorrhagic<br />
– 50% are ischemic
CCocaine: MMechanisms h <strong>of</strong> f Injury I<br />
• Abr<strong>up</strong>t hypertension<br />
• Cocaine-induced coagulation g<br />
– Can result in moyamoya<br />
syndrome<br />
• Vasospasm<br />
– Vascular endothelin-1<br />
– Can involve vasa vasora <strong>of</strong><br />
larger arteries mural necrosis<br />
aneurysm or r<strong>up</strong>ture<br />
Konzen et al. <strong>Stroke</strong> 1995;26:1114-<br />
• Vasculitis 1118
CCocaine-Induced I d dHHemorrhage h<br />
• More likely in African-American<br />
individuals<br />
• As compared to cocaine-negative controls<br />
– Higher admission blood pressures<br />
– Si Significantly ifi l more subcortical b i l hemorrhages<br />
h h<br />
– Higher rates <strong>of</strong> intraventricular hemorrhage<br />
– Worse functional outcome<br />
– 3 times more likely to die<br />
Martin Schild et al <strong>Stroke</strong>. 2010;41:680-4
CCocaine-induced d dVVasculitis l<br />
• Usually small vessels<br />
– Not seen on<br />
angiography<br />
• Can be progressive<br />
• Successfully treated<br />
with corticosteroids in<br />
a ffew<br />
cases<br />
Fredericks <strong>Stroke</strong> 1991
Methamphetamine <strong>and</strong> Related<br />
Drugs<br />
• Cause hemorrhage, stroke, necrotizing<br />
vasculitis similar to cocaine<br />
• Onset <strong>of</strong> stroke usually soon after use (like<br />
cocaine)<br />
– But onset may be delayed <strong>up</strong> to 3 weeks or<br />
longer
<strong>Stroke</strong> Associated with Stimulant<br />
Amines: Treatment<br />
• Very little controlled data<br />
• Control <strong>of</strong> blood pressure<br />
– Aggressive in intracerebral hemorrhage<br />
• TPA: Martin Schild et al. <strong>Stroke</strong> 2009<br />
– 29 patients with cocaine-induced stroke vs controls<br />
– No difference in outcome<br />
• Essentially no other controlled studies with TPA<br />
in stroke after cocaine or methamphetamine
TTreatment: APASS Trial T l<br />
• Subset <strong>of</strong> the WARSS trial<br />
• 1770 patients<br />
– 1050 (59”%) APL negative<br />
– 720 (41%) APL positive<br />
• No increase in stroke rate in APL + patients (22.2% vs 21.8%)<br />
– Patients with both APL <strong>and</strong> LA: 31.8% even rate) vs patients negative for<br />
both (24% event rate)<br />
• No difference between aspirin <strong>and</strong> warfarin<br />
• NOT necessarily applicable to patients with known APLS syndrome<br />
• Unanswered questions q concerning gstroke in the yyoung, g, repeated p<br />
strokes, <strong>and</strong> Sneddon syndrome
SSickle kl Cell C ll Disease D<br />
• Affects ~30% <strong>of</strong><br />
individuals with<br />
hhemoglobin l bi SS<br />
• Variable presentation:<br />
may depend in part on<br />
haplotype<br />
– 3 major haplotypes (Benin,<br />
Senegal Senegal, <strong>and</strong> Bantu)<br />
– Bantu most severe, Senegal<br />
least severe
SSickle kl Cell C ll Disease D<br />
• Affects ~30% <strong>of</strong> patients with hemoglobin<br />
SSA
Th The Cl Clotting Cascade C d<br />
Fibrin<br />
polymers<br />
Fibrin<br />
monomers<br />
Thrombin<br />
Fibrinogen
TTreatment: APASS Trial T l<br />
• Subset <strong>of</strong> the WARSS trial<br />
• 1770 patients<br />
– 1050 (59%) APL negative<br />
– 720 (41%) APL positive<br />
• No increase in stroke rate in APL + patients (22.2% vs<br />
21 21.8%) 8%)<br />
– Patients with both APL <strong>and</strong> LA: 31.8% even rate) vs patients<br />
negative for both (24% event rate)<br />
• No difference between aspirin p <strong>and</strong> warfarin<br />
• NOT conducted in patients with known APL syndrome<br />
– Unanswered questions concerning stroke in the young, repeated<br />
strokes, <strong>and</strong> Sneddon syndrome
Antiphospholipid Antibodies <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>Stroke</strong><br />
• Strong association with stroke in the young<br />
– Brey et al: LA or aPL in 21/46 patients
• Encephalopathy <strong>and</strong> biopsy-proven cerebrovascular inflammatory changes in a cocaine abuser.<br />
• Diez-Tejedor E, Frank A, Gutierrez M, Barreiro P.<br />
• Department <strong>of</strong> Neurology (<strong>Stroke</strong> Unit), Hospital Universitario La Paz, Universidad Autonoma de<br />
Madrid, Paseo de la Castellana, 261, Madrid, Spain.<br />
• Ab Abstract t t<br />
• Cocaine abuse is a well known cause <strong>of</strong> cerebrovascular complications. An inflammatory<br />
vasculopathy hypothesis has been proposed, but the medical literature has only reported a few<br />
pathological confirmations. We report a case with a biopsy demonstrating cerebral inflammatory<br />
vascular changes that are associated with cocaine abuse. A 21-year-old male, a twice weekly cocaine<br />
abuser abuser, developed encephalopathy encephalopathy, apraxia <strong>and</strong> left hemiparesis with hemisensory loss during the<br />
first week after his last cocaine intake; postural tremor <strong>and</strong> dystonia appeared later. Laboratory data<br />
were unrevealing. Cerebral angiography showed a lack <strong>of</strong> vascularization in the left precentral <strong>and</strong><br />
central arterial gro<strong>up</strong>s. A corticomeningeal cerebral biopsy demonstrated perivascular cell collection<br />
<strong>and</strong> transmural lymphomonocytic infiltration <strong>of</strong> the small cortical vessels. All symptoms improved<br />
with corticosteroid treatment, but 4 years later, the patient returned with a worsening <strong>of</strong> his<br />
encephalopathy <strong>and</strong> a severe memory impairment, impairment emotional lability <strong>and</strong> apraxia. apraxia A cerebral<br />
magnetic resonance image (MRI) showed subcortical <strong>and</strong> periventricular lesions suggesting ischemic<br />
damage in small-size vessel areas as well as cortical atrophy. This new case s<strong>up</strong>ports the existence <strong>of</strong><br />
an encephalopathy associated with vascular inflammatory changes in a cocaine abuser, although<br />
more clinical <strong>and</strong> experimental data are necessary to define its physiopathology.<br />
• PMID: 10210820 [PubMed [ - as s<strong>up</strong>plied pp by y publisher] p ]
FFredericks d i k et t al l <strong>Stroke</strong> St k 1991;22;1437-1439<br />
1991 22 1437 1439
• Check TPA-pubmed<br />
CCocaine-induced d dstroke k
CCocaine-induced d dstroke k<br />
Konzen et al. <strong>Stroke</strong> 1995;26:1114 1995;26:1114-1118 1118
IgA Anticardiolipin Antibodies:<br />
Samarkos et al 2006<br />
• IgA anti-cardiolipin antibodies in 40% <strong>of</strong><br />
patients with primary antiphospholipid<br />
antibody syndrome (PAPS)<br />
– IgA anti- anti- β2 glycoprotein 1 in 25.7% 25 7% <strong>of</strong><br />
patients with PAPS<br />
• Only anti-cardiolipin antibodies correlated<br />
with disease<br />
– Those to β2 glycoprotein 1 correlated less well
S<strong>Stroke</strong> k in Sickle S kl Cell C ll Disease D<br />
Study Number <strong>of</strong> silent Total number Prevalence Confidence<br />
cerebral infarcts <strong>of</strong> patients Interval<br />
CSSCD 58 266 21.8% 16.8-26.8<br />
French cohort 23 155 15% 9.4-20.6<br />
London cohort 16 64 25% 14.4-35.6<br />
Cumulative total 97 485 20% 16.4-23.6<br />
Overt <strong>Stroke</strong>s Silent Cerebral Infarcts<br />
Frequency < age 14% 9% 22%<br />
Average g age g <strong>of</strong> onset 7.7 years y Prior to age g 6<br />
TCD Abnormal Not necessarily abnormal<br />
velocity<br />
CCSD: Cooperative Study for Sickle Cell Disease Buchanan: Hematology 2004