identification, assessment and prioritisation of eu ... - Ariacube

BiPRO
All information concerning planned or porposed measures has in addition been taken into
consideration in the evaluation of need for action in chapter 7 (Gaps and deficits in relation ot
the objective of minimizing releases) and in the proposal of potential additional measures to
be taken at Community level in chapter 8 (Measures to fill identified gaps).
The feed back from industrial Stakeholders and NGOs was poor.
The proposals from industry and Marine Conventions have been compiled in a specific
overview matrix in chapter 6.3. All provided proposals have been used and evaluated in
chapters 7 and 8.
After the elaboration of the draft final report (executive summary, source inventory results and
the broad list of proposed measures has been send out again to Stakeholders for final
comments.
A summary compilation of received comments is provided in Table 4-1 below.
Stakeholder Type of Comment Area of concern
EUROFER Mass flow,
measures
Highlight correlation between reduction in air
emissions and increased concentrations on
waste;
Number of already exisiting research and
monitoring activities deemed significant
BIR (Shredder Industry) Mass flow Hightlight that shredder industry is not a
source of unintentional production but only of
unintentional release in case polluted feed
material is used in the process
Cembureau Mass flow Correct EF used for calculation of
PCDD/PCDF and PCB mass flow*; coincineration
in cement kilms attributed high
destruction efficiency
FEAD oral Stress the specific situation of the waste
incineration sector with ELV for PCDD/PCDF;
in contrast to other IPPC sectors this factor
should be highlighted (need for action in other
sectors e.g. metal industry is seen as
somewhat higher
CEPI (Pulp and Paper) oral As the paper industry is classified low need of
action it should be stated that no action are
needed; concerns as regards proportionality
of proposed measures; high costs if regular
measurements of POPs required
page 48