Farming in the Uplands - ARCHIVE: Defra

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6 Farming in the Uplands Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) but have also considered matters that are the principal responsibility of other Government departments. We expect Defra to consider our recommendations alongside those made by the Commission for Rural Communities in formulating its uplands strategy. EMBARGOED ADVANCE COPY: Not to be published in full, or part, in any form before 00.01am GMT Wednesday 16 February 2011
EMBARGOED ADVANCE COPY: Not to be published in full, or part, in any form before 00.01am GMT Wednesday 16 February 2011 Farming in the Uplands 7 2 The Commission for Rural Communities 8. The Commission for Rural Communities (CRC), a Defra-funded non-departmental public body, was created by the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006. The CRC received £6.48 million Grant in Aid from Defra in 2009–10 and employed 74 staff. 17 There are currently ten Commissioners in addition to the Chairman. Under the Act, the Commission’s purpose was to promote awareness of rural needs among relevant authorities and the general public and its three main functions were: representation, advice and monitoring; research; and information services. 18 The CRC also supported Defra’s role of encouraging other Government departments to take into account rural matters when developing policy and designing delivery. The process, known as ‘rural proofing’, requires policy-makers to consider the impact of rural issues such as more dispersed population, fewer service outlets, greater travel needs or smaller economic markets on the effectiveness of new policy, legislation or delivery mechanisms. 19 9. On 29 June 2010, the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Rt Hon Caroline Spelman MP, announced that the CRC would be abolished in March 2011 and that rural policy would be subsumed back into the department. 20 Defra anticipates that the abolition of the CRC will cost approximately £2.5m in redundancy costs and save around £18m. Understandably, Dr Burgess, Chairman of the CRC, expressed sadness at the decision to abolish the Commission. 21 He told us that he expected the CRC’s evidencebased work and working with stakeholders would be taken into Defra. 22 Professor Shucksmith, Commissioner at the CRC, told us that he would wish the Rural Communities Policy Unit to take on the Commission’s focus on rural disadvantage and that its advice would be transparent to the public. 23 10. Following the announcement disquiet was expressed about whether and how the Government would sustain the work done by the CRC. 24 The NFU welcomed the decision to bring policy-making back into Defra but identified two risks resulting from the demise of the CRC. First, whether Defra would be as good as the CRC had been at listening to farmers and local communities and second, ensuring Defra was influential within Whitehall. Several rural and upland issues are the primary responsibility of other Government departments. Dr Clark, Head of Policy at the National Farmers’ Union (NFU), told us that: “The uplands are not led just from [Defra HQ]; they have to be led from CLG, DECC, the Home Office and also the MoD, which has important landholdings. All 17 Commission for Rural Communities Annual Report and Accounts 2009–10, 20 July 2010, HC 200 18 Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006, sections 18–21 19 See http://ruralcommunities.gov.uk/category/our-work/impact4/ruralproofing/ 20 For the written ministerial statement, please see: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm100629/wmstext/100629m0001.htm 21 Q 7 22 Q 8 23 Q 8 24 Ev 53; CPRE responds to scrapping of Commission for Rural Communities (CRC), 29 June 2010, http://www.cpre.org.uk/news/view/686; The countryside will be the poorer, The Daily Telegraph, 2 July 2010
Page 1 and 2: House of Commons Environment, Food
Page 3 and 4: House of Commons Environment, Food
Page 5 and 6: Contents EMBARGOED ADVANCE COPY: No
Page 7 and 8: Summary EMBARGOED ADVANCE COPY: Not
Page 9: EMBARGOED ADVANCE COPY: Not to be p
Page 13 and 14: EMBARGOED ADVANCE COPY: Not to be p
Page 39 and 40: 5 Upland communities EMBARGOED ADVA
Page 47 and 48: 6 Conclusion EMBARGOED ADVANCE COPY
Page 49 and 50: 4: A new approach to funding EMBARG
Page 59 and 60: Witnesses EMBARGOED ADVANCE COPY: N
Page 61 and 62:
Oral evidence Environment, Food and
Page 63 and 64:
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Tom Blenkinsop Richard Drax George
Page 79 and 80:
walked they ain’t coming back, be
Page 81 and 82:
great, but there is the wider issue
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
to engage in a conversation with th
Page 95 and 96:
Q161 George Eustice: One of the com
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Written evidence Environment, Food
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
EMBARGOED ADVANCE COPY: Not to be p
show all

Farming in the Uplands - ARCHIVE: Defra

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?