Farming in the Uplands - ARCHIVE: Defra
Farming in the Uplands - ARCHIVE: Defra
Farming in the Uplands - ARCHIVE: Defra
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
EMBARGOED ADVANCE COPY:<br />
Not to be published <strong>in</strong> full, or part, <strong>in</strong> any form before<br />
00.01am GMT Wednesday 16 February 2011<br />
<strong>Farm<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Uplands</strong> 17<br />
35. Will Cockba<strong>in</strong>, uplands spokesman for <strong>the</strong> NFU, expla<strong>in</strong>ed that hill farmers are<br />
restricted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir bus<strong>in</strong>ess choices due to <strong>the</strong> limitations of climate and environment. He<br />
added that as hill farmers were at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> livestock production cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>y were “very<br />
vulnerable” to price fluctuations and had nowhere to pass on any <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir costs. 78<br />
Upland farms are also relatively poorly supported by <strong>the</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gle Payment Scheme, under<br />
which <strong>the</strong> per hectare payment rate broadly reflects <strong>the</strong> old production-l<strong>in</strong>ked subsidy<br />
level.<br />
36. The M<strong>in</strong>ister told us that hill farmers deserved extra support because of <strong>the</strong> additional<br />
challenges of farm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> uplands, but added that any additional fund<strong>in</strong>g would have to<br />
come from exist<strong>in</strong>g resources. 79 He expla<strong>in</strong>ed that <strong>the</strong>re were obstacles to provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
additional funds through environmental stewardship schemes and <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>y would<br />
have to “...come out of <strong>the</strong> Rural Development Programme money and, yes, that means<br />
someth<strong>in</strong>g else will be cut”. 80 Sources of additional <strong>in</strong>come for hill farmers fall pr<strong>in</strong>cipally<br />
<strong>in</strong>to three categories: farm<strong>in</strong>g activities; diversification (such as tourism); and develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
additional land-based sources of <strong>in</strong>come (such as carbon storage). While acknowledg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that graz<strong>in</strong>g livestock farm<strong>in</strong>g is currently almost always economically unviable without<br />
public payments, <strong>Defra</strong> argued that <strong>the</strong> upland environment provides farmers with<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess opportunities both through diversification <strong>in</strong>to tourism and <strong>the</strong> development of<br />
markets for public goods. 81 In this context public goods means ma<strong>in</strong>ly environmental and<br />
landscape benefits that farmers provide and that <strong>the</strong> public value; but for which<br />
traditionally <strong>the</strong>re has been no market mechanism through which farmers can generate an<br />
<strong>in</strong>come.<br />
37. William Worsley, President of <strong>the</strong> CLA told us that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> uplands, while o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess opportunities may exist <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> areas, livestock farm<strong>in</strong>g was <strong>the</strong> “bedrock”. 82<br />
Similarly, Mr Cockba<strong>in</strong> told us that “You have to recognise that it is profitable farm<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
is <strong>the</strong> start and everyth<strong>in</strong>g else is on <strong>the</strong> back of that.” 83<br />
38. <strong>Farm<strong>in</strong>g</strong> should be <strong>the</strong> primary activity of hill farms. The Government’s<br />
forthcom<strong>in</strong>g uplands strategy must address how, as <strong>the</strong> first priority, farm<strong>in</strong>g activities<br />
can be enhanced and made more efficient to <strong>in</strong>crease hill farm <strong>in</strong>comes. We accept that<br />
farm<strong>in</strong>g will not necessarily provide sufficient <strong>in</strong>come for some hill farms to cont<strong>in</strong>ue.<br />
The Government’s uplands strategy should <strong>the</strong>refore consider <strong>the</strong> barriers to<br />
diversification and new markets and how best to enable farmers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> uplands to<br />
exploit those bus<strong>in</strong>ess opportunities.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gle Payment Scheme<br />
39. In 2005 <strong>the</strong> UK <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>the</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gle Payment Scheme (SPS)—<strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> source of EU<br />
subsidy for UK farmers. Under <strong>the</strong> scheme <strong>the</strong> previous production-l<strong>in</strong>ked payments were<br />
78 Q 102<br />
79 Qq 170–171<br />
80 Q 171<br />
81 Ev 81<br />
82 Q 102<br />
83 Q 103