29.06.2013 Views

Farming in the Uplands - ARCHIVE: Defra

Farming in the Uplands - ARCHIVE: Defra

Farming in the Uplands - ARCHIVE: Defra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EMBARGOED ADVANCE COPY:<br />

Not to be published <strong>in</strong> full, or part, <strong>in</strong> any form before<br />

00.01am GMT Wednesday 16 February 2011<br />

<strong>Farm<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Uplands</strong> 17<br />

35. Will Cockba<strong>in</strong>, uplands spokesman for <strong>the</strong> NFU, expla<strong>in</strong>ed that hill farmers are<br />

restricted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir bus<strong>in</strong>ess choices due to <strong>the</strong> limitations of climate and environment. He<br />

added that as hill farmers were at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> livestock production cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>y were “very<br />

vulnerable” to price fluctuations and had nowhere to pass on any <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir costs. 78<br />

Upland farms are also relatively poorly supported by <strong>the</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gle Payment Scheme, under<br />

which <strong>the</strong> per hectare payment rate broadly reflects <strong>the</strong> old production-l<strong>in</strong>ked subsidy<br />

level.<br />

36. The M<strong>in</strong>ister told us that hill farmers deserved extra support because of <strong>the</strong> additional<br />

challenges of farm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> uplands, but added that any additional fund<strong>in</strong>g would have to<br />

come from exist<strong>in</strong>g resources. 79 He expla<strong>in</strong>ed that <strong>the</strong>re were obstacles to provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

additional funds through environmental stewardship schemes and <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>y would<br />

have to “...come out of <strong>the</strong> Rural Development Programme money and, yes, that means<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g else will be cut”. 80 Sources of additional <strong>in</strong>come for hill farmers fall pr<strong>in</strong>cipally<br />

<strong>in</strong>to three categories: farm<strong>in</strong>g activities; diversification (such as tourism); and develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

additional land-based sources of <strong>in</strong>come (such as carbon storage). While acknowledg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that graz<strong>in</strong>g livestock farm<strong>in</strong>g is currently almost always economically unviable without<br />

public payments, <strong>Defra</strong> argued that <strong>the</strong> upland environment provides farmers with<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess opportunities both through diversification <strong>in</strong>to tourism and <strong>the</strong> development of<br />

markets for public goods. 81 In this context public goods means ma<strong>in</strong>ly environmental and<br />

landscape benefits that farmers provide and that <strong>the</strong> public value; but for which<br />

traditionally <strong>the</strong>re has been no market mechanism through which farmers can generate an<br />

<strong>in</strong>come.<br />

37. William Worsley, President of <strong>the</strong> CLA told us that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> uplands, while o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess opportunities may exist <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> areas, livestock farm<strong>in</strong>g was <strong>the</strong> “bedrock”. 82<br />

Similarly, Mr Cockba<strong>in</strong> told us that “You have to recognise that it is profitable farm<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

is <strong>the</strong> start and everyth<strong>in</strong>g else is on <strong>the</strong> back of that.” 83<br />

38. <strong>Farm<strong>in</strong>g</strong> should be <strong>the</strong> primary activity of hill farms. The Government’s<br />

forthcom<strong>in</strong>g uplands strategy must address how, as <strong>the</strong> first priority, farm<strong>in</strong>g activities<br />

can be enhanced and made more efficient to <strong>in</strong>crease hill farm <strong>in</strong>comes. We accept that<br />

farm<strong>in</strong>g will not necessarily provide sufficient <strong>in</strong>come for some hill farms to cont<strong>in</strong>ue.<br />

The Government’s uplands strategy should <strong>the</strong>refore consider <strong>the</strong> barriers to<br />

diversification and new markets and how best to enable farmers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> uplands to<br />

exploit those bus<strong>in</strong>ess opportunities.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle Payment Scheme<br />

39. In 2005 <strong>the</strong> UK <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>the</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gle Payment Scheme (SPS)—<strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> source of EU<br />

subsidy for UK farmers. Under <strong>the</strong> scheme <strong>the</strong> previous production-l<strong>in</strong>ked payments were<br />

78 Q 102<br />

79 Qq 170–171<br />

80 Q 171<br />

81 Ev 81<br />

82 Q 102<br />

83 Q 103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!