29.06.2013 Views

Farming in the Uplands - ARCHIVE: Defra

Farming in the Uplands - ARCHIVE: Defra

Farming in the Uplands - ARCHIVE: Defra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ev 70 Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee: Evidence<br />

12. As Figure 2 below shows, trends <strong>in</strong> upland and lowland sheep breed<strong>in</strong>g numbers are broadly <strong>the</strong> same<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> stratification of <strong>the</strong> sheep <strong>in</strong>dustry—both lowland and upland systems be<strong>in</strong>g reliant on each o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

Upland sheep breed<strong>in</strong>g numbers <strong>in</strong> England appear higher now than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mid 1970s, shortly after <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

jo<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> EC, although direct comparisons are made diYcult due to def<strong>in</strong>itional changes.<br />

Th. head<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

2,000<br />

0<br />

Figure 2<br />

SHEEP BREEDING FLOCK NUMBERS IN ENGLAND<br />

(a)<br />

Sheep breed<strong>in</strong>g flock: England<br />

(b) (c)<br />

Lowland<br />

1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009<br />

(a) 1975 def<strong>in</strong>ition of LFA before widen<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>clude Disadvantaged Areas, excludes m<strong>in</strong>or hold<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

(b) Current LFA, excludes m<strong>in</strong>or hold<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

(c) In 2006, <strong>the</strong> method of assign<strong>in</strong>g LFA markers to hold<strong>in</strong>gs was revised and retrospectively applied from<br />

June 2000. All hold<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Source: June Survey<br />

13. Figure 3 shows that suckler cow numbers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> uplands have ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed a far more consistent level<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> period of European Community membership, unlike <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lowlands where numbers have<br />

fluctuated more significantly.<br />

Th. head<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

(a)<br />

Lowland<br />

Figure 3<br />

BEEF COW NUMBERS IN ENGLAND<br />

EMBARGOED ADVANCE COPY:<br />

Not to be published <strong>in</strong> full, or part, <strong>in</strong> any form before<br />

00.01am GMT Wednesday 16 February 2011<br />

Lowland - CTS<br />

LFA<br />

LFA - CTS<br />

Suckler herd: England<br />

1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009<br />

(a) 1975 def<strong>in</strong>ition of LFA before widen<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>clude Disadvantaged Areas, excludes m<strong>in</strong>or hold<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

(b) Current LFA, excludes m<strong>in</strong>or hold<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

(c) In 2006, <strong>the</strong> method of assign<strong>in</strong>g LFA markers to hold<strong>in</strong>gs was revised and retrospectively applied from<br />

June 2000. All hold<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Sources: 1975–2006, June Census/Survey, <strong>Defra</strong>; 2004 onwards, CTS/RADAR, <strong>Defra</strong>.<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

LFA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!