30.06.2013 Views

smart technologies for safety engineering

smart technologies for safety engineering

smart technologies for safety engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Adaptive Impact Absorption 187<br />

(a)<br />

Figure 5.34 Per<strong>for</strong>mance of (a) a standard controller in the time domain and (b) the improved controller<br />

in the time domain<br />

examples of operation of the developed controller with and without the regulation unit. The<br />

graphs present exemplary time histories of the velocity sensor input and the generated control<br />

signals. The tasks <strong>for</strong> the controller were identification of the vertical velocity on the basis<br />

of the signal from a photosensor, determination of the proper control signal sequence and<br />

application of the signal after a minimal time delay. The cases on both graphs are characterized<br />

by an identical initial input of velocity photosensor, which are represented by channel 1 in<br />

Figures 5.34(a) and (b). A dedicated numerical algorithm recalculated the signal readings in<br />

order to determine the impact velocity in the time between the end of the velocity signal and the<br />

beginning of the control signal, depicted as channel 2. The controller per<strong>for</strong>med the required<br />

logic operations and generated the output signal after 40 μs from receiving the velocity input<br />

signal (Figures 5.34(a) and (b)). Channel 2 in both graphs in Figures 5.34(a) and (b) depicts the<br />

time history of the control current generation by the developed system. The response time of<br />

the current generation circuit determines the dominant time delays of the actuation system. In<br />

the case presented in the graphs (a) and (b), the desired current magnitude to generate was 0.5<br />

A. The plot (a) represents the current generation process (channel 2) which is not regulated by<br />

the additional fast current generation unit, with the effect of the time delay equal to ca. 15 ms.<br />

In the graph (b) the regulated generation process is presented, which allowed the current<br />

generation time delay to be reduced to ca. 0.5 ms. Minimization of the response time made it<br />

possible to implement the MR device <strong>for</strong> the impact application, as the original response time<br />

of 15 ms gave no practical possibilities to control the process that lasts 50 ms in total.<br />

5.5 Adaptive Inflatable Structures with Controlled Release of Pressure<br />

5.5.1 The Concept of Adaptive Inflatable Structures (AIS), Mathematical<br />

Modeling and Numerical Tools<br />

Adaptive inflatable structures are one of the special <strong>technologies</strong> <strong>for</strong> adaptive impact absorption.<br />

AIS are structures filled with compressed gas, the pressure of which is actively adjusted during<br />

the impact process. Pressure adjustment relies on appropriate initial inflation and controlled<br />

release of gas during the event. Such active control of internal pressure allows to change the<br />

dynamic characteristics of the inflatable structure and enables adaptation to various impact<br />

(b)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!