smart technologies for safety engineering

The Virtual Distortion Method 33
References
1. W. Nowacki, Teoria sprezystosci (in Polish), PWN, Warsaw, 1970.
2. J. Holnicki-Szulc and J. Gierliński, Structural modifications simulated by virtual distortions, International
Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering, 28, 1989, 645–666.
3. E. Kroener, Kontinuumstheorie der Versetzungen und Eigenspannungen, in editors, Ergebnisse der
Angewandten Mathematik (in German) (eds L. Collatz and F. Loesch,), Vol. 5, Springer, Berlin,
1958.
4. J.H. Argyris, Elasto-plastic matrix displacement analysis of three-dimensional continua, Journal of
Royal Aeronautical Society, 69, 1965, 633–636.
5. G. Maier, A matrix structural theory of piecewise-linear plasticity with interacting yield planes,
Meccanica, 7, 1970, 51–66.
6. M.A. Akgun, J.H. Garcelon and R.T. Haftka. Fast exact linear and non-linear structural reanalysis
and the Sherman–Morrison–Woodbury formulas, International Journal Numerical Methods in
Engineering, 5, 2001, 1587–1606.
7. J. Holnicki-Szulc, Virtual distortion method, in Lecture Notes in Engineering, Springer, Heidelberg–
Berlin, 1991.
8. J. Holnicki-Szulc and J.T. Gierliński, Structural Analysis, Design and Control by the Virtual Distortion
Method, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, 1995.
9. P. Kol̷akowski, M. Wikl̷o and J. Holnicki-Szulc, The virtual distortion method – a versatile reanalysis
tool for structures and systems, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, (to appear).
10. A.M.A. Kassim and B.H.V. Topping, Static reanalysis: a review, Journal of Structural Engineering
ASCE, 113(6), 1987, 1029–1045.
11. J.F.M. Barthelemy and R.T. Haftka, Approximation concepts for optimum design – a review, Structural
Optimization, 5, 1993, 129–144.
12. J. Sherman and W.J. Morrison, Adjustment of an inverse matrix corresponding to changes in the
elements of a given column or a given row of the original matrix, Annals of Mathematical Statistics,
20, 1949, 621.
13. M. Woodbury, Inverting modified matrices, Memorandum report 42, Statistical Research Group,
Princeton University, NewJersey, 1950.
14. R.L. Fox and H. Miura, An approximate analysis technique for design calculations. Technical note,
American Institute of Aeronautical and Astronautical Journal, 9(1), 1971, 177–179.
15. A.K. Noor and H.E. Lowder, Approximate techniques of structural reanalysis, Computers and Structures,
4, 1974, 801–812.
16. U. Kirsch and S. Liu, Exact structural reanalysis by a first-order reduced basis approach, Structural
Optimization, 10, 1995, 153–158.
17. U. Kirsch, A unified reanalysis approach for structural analysis, design and optimization, Structural
and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 25, 2003, 67–85.
18. K.I. Majid and D.W.C. Elliott, Forces and deflections in changing structures, Structural Engineering,
51, 1973, 93–101.
19. B.H.V. Topping and A.M.A. Kassim, The use and efficiency of the theorems of structural variation for
finite element analysis, International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engin., 24, 1987, 1900–1920.
20. M.P. Saka, The theorems of structural variation for solid cubic finite elements, Computers and
Structures, 68, 1998, 89–100.
21. K.I. Majid and T. Celik. The elastic–plastic analysis of frames by the theorems of structural variation,
International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering, 21, 1985, 671–681.
22. L. Deng and M. Ghosn, Pseudoforce method for nonlinear analysis and reanalysis of structural
systems, Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 127(5), 2001, 570–578.
23. H.R. Bae and R.V. Grandhi, Successive matrix inversion method for reanalysis of engineering structural
systems, American Institute of Aeronautical and Astronautical Journal, 42(8), 2004, 1529–
1535.