30.06.2013 Views

smart technologies for safety engineering

smart technologies for safety engineering

smart technologies for safety engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Adaptive Impact Absorption 205<br />

5.6.2 Energy Absorption by the Prismatic Thin-Walled Structure<br />

One of the most important issues of the energy-absorbing structure’s properties are their<br />

technical and economical efficiencies. Technical efficiency of the impact energy absorber,<br />

in the case of lightweight means of transport applications, can be measured as a ratio of its<br />

maximal energy-absorption capability to the gross mass of the absorber. The defined indicator is<br />

known as the SEA (J/kg), the specific energy absorption parameter. The significant economical<br />

efficiency index can be <strong>for</strong>mulated as the quotient of the protective structure cost to its SEA.<br />

One of the best known SEA per<strong>for</strong>mance energy-absorbing processes is the axial crushing of<br />

the thin-walled tube. Its huge advantage is the fact that all internal <strong>for</strong>ces generated during the<br />

process of crushing are self-balanced; hence tubes do not need any external supports to provide<br />

stable and progressive de<strong>for</strong>mation. Such profiles can be used in many <strong>engineering</strong> objects as<br />

structural members, where the most popular examples are the automotive crash zones.<br />

The first scientific studies devoted to the problem of crash behavior focused on a simple<br />

process of crushing of the thin-walled circular tube, being loaded along the direction of<br />

its axis of symmetry. During experimental studies, two characteristic de<strong>for</strong>mation patterns<br />

were observed: axisymmetric, called the ‘concertina’ mode and nonaxis-symmetric mode<br />

known as the ‘diamond’ pattern. An approximate theoretical <strong>for</strong>mula, describing the concertina<br />

folding mode, was derived and published by Alexander in 1960 [40] and modified<br />

later by several scientists <strong>for</strong> better accuracy. The mentioned family of analytical solutions<br />

was based on the rigid–perfectly plastic material model. Following the experimental observations,<br />

Alexander proposed the kinematics of the axisymmetric de<strong>for</strong>mation pattern with<br />

stationary plastic hinges, contributing to bending dissipation combined with the contribution<br />

of the circumferential stretching of a shell (cf. Figure (5.50). The described approach, with<br />

later modifications introducing a more complex description of the folding pattern, gave the<br />

answer to important parameters of the quasi-static crushing process: the average crushing <strong>for</strong>ce<br />

Pm and the length of the plastic folding wave 2H. Alexander’s theory has given a base to the<br />

general macroelements method developed by Abramowicz and Wierzbicki [41] in the last two<br />

decades of the twentieth century.<br />

The macroelement method is applicable to more complex structures and de<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong>ms,<br />

allowing axial, bending and torsional responses of assemblies of macroelements to be solved.<br />

Crushing of the profile, with the prismatic thin-walled cross-section, can be discretized into a<br />

set of super-folding elements (SFE). For a simple rectangular tube, three basic folding patterns<br />

were isolated: symmetric, asymmetric and inverted modes. The asymmetric mode has the<br />

Figure 5.50 Alexander’s model of concertina mode crushing of a round thin walled tube [40]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!