Nevada-Yuba-Placer Strategic Fire Plan 2011 - Board of Forestry ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

and the California Forest Practice Rules. Additional rules enacted by the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection are also enforced to protect these resources. NEU Forest Practice Inspectors ensure that private landowners abide by these laws when harvesting trees. Although there are specific exemptions in some cases, compliance with the Forest Practice Act and Board rules apply to all commercial harvesting operations for landowners of small parcels, to ranchers owning hundreds of acres, and large timber companies with thousands of acres. The Timber Harvesting Plan (THP) is the environmental review documents submitted by landowners to CAL FIRE outlining what timber he or she wants to harvest, how it will be harvested, and the steps that will be taken to prevent damage to the environment. THPs are prepared by Registered Professional Foresters (RPFs) who are licensed to prepare these comprehensive, detailed plans. THPs can range from about 100 pages to more than 500 pages. NEU Forest Practice Inspectors follow-up on approved THPs with site inspections and can shutdown operations, cite or fine Registered Professional Foresters, Licensed Timber Operators (LTOs), and landowners if illegal operations are found. Under this program, law enforcement and prevention work together to ensure environmental compliance. Forestry and Landowner Assistance NEU Foresters administer several state and federal forestry assistance programs with the goal of reducing wildland fuel loads and improving the health and productivity of private forest lands. California's Forest Improvement Program (CFIP) and other state and federal programs that NEU Foresters administer, offer cost-share opportunities to assist individual landowners with land management planning, conservation practices to enhance wildlife habitat, and practices to enhance the productivity of the land. The NEU CFIP program directs grant funds to prioritized fuel treatments and forestry improvement projects on the ground. The aim is to improve the economic and environmental value and watershed quality of private forestlands. The cost share program encourages landowner participation and requires land uses to remain consistent with the goals of the program following implementation. - 43 –
2006 CFIP COST-SHARE CAP RATES PRACTICE Management Plan High (New) Management Plan Revised/Low (Mini) CFIP CAP RATE 90% COST-SHARE 1 75% COST SHARE $3500 + $3.00/acre 1 st 160 acres $2.50/acre each additional acre to 1000 $3150 + $2.70/acre 1 st 160 acres $2.25/acre each additional acre to 1000 - 44 – $2625+ $2.25/acre 1 st 160 acres $1.88/acre each additional acre to 1000 Rates for plans larger than 1000 acres are negotiated w/CDF forester $1750 + $1.40/acre $1575 + $1.26/acre $1313 + $1.05/acre RPF Supervision $75/acre 1 st 5 acres $40/acre each additional acre $68/acre 1 st 5 acres $36/acre each additional acre Site Prep Light $220/acre $198/acre $165/acre Moderate $300/acre $270/acre $225/acre Heavy $400/acre $360/acre $300/acre Trees & Planting Average $160/acre $144/acre $120/acre Moderate $200/acre $180/acre $150/acre Difficult $240/acre $216/acre $180/acre Tree Shelters $260/acre $234/acre $195/acre Pre-commercial Thinning 2 Light $200/acre $180/acre $150/acre Moderate $300/acre $270/acre $225/acre Heavy $400/acre $360/acre $300/acre Pruning 2 $125 for 50 trees/acre $200 for 100 trees/acre $275 for 150 trees/acre Release 2 $112.50 for 50 trees/acre $180 for 100 trees/acre $247.50 for 150 trees/acre Light $200/acre $180/acre $150/acre $56/acre 1 st 5 acres $30/acre each additional acre $93.75 for 50 trees/acre $150 for 100 trees/acre $206.25 for 150 trees/acre Moderate $300/acre $270/acre $225/acre Heavy $400/acre $360/acre $300/acre Follow-up/Slash Disposal Light $200/acre $180/acre $150/acre Moderate $350/acre $315/acre $262.50/acre Heavy $600/acre $540/acre $450/acre Land Conservation /Wildlife/Fisheries Projects 3 Cost based on problem. Use SIP or EQIP rates as a guide 1 The 90% rate will cover all projects on substantially damaged timberland by wildfire, insects, diseases, wind, floods, landslides or earthquakes. 2 Disposal of slash must meet minimum Fire Hazard Reduction Standards per Forest Practices Act. 3 Maximum allowable costs do not appear for land conservation or habitat improvement. In these categories activity is variable and will depend on site condition, acreage, and/or type of project. However, costs will be evaluated based on rates used for SIP or EQIP.
Page 1 and 2: Unit Strategic Fire Plan Nevada-Yub
Page 3 and 4: SIGNATURES Unit Strategic Fire Plan
Page 5 and 6: Priorities: Goals: 1. To Reduce the
Page 7 and 8: and a safe healthy environment in w
Page 9 and 10: activities. The Agency delivers abo
Page 11 and 12: Placer County is the second fastest
Page 13 and 14: (9000’). Topographic influences a
Page 15 and 16: Population Growth and Development I
Page 17 and 18: promotion of grant programs aimed a
Page 19 and 20: 3. Assist local government in devel
Page 21 and 22: Colfax (Station 30) 1 - State Owned
Page 23 and 24: maintenance of the lookout is expec
Page 25 and 26: Remote Automated Weather Stations (
Page 27 and 28: Lincoln RAWS (Placer County) Locati
Page 29 and 30: along SRA-LRA boundaries. Normally
Page 31 and 32: Placer County Fire Safe Councils wi
Page 33 and 34: Dollar Point Yes 2001 Dutch Flat Ye
Page 35 and 36: Forest Yes 2001 Goodyears Bar Yes 2
Page 37 and 38: • Reduction of flammable vegetati
Page 39 and 40: Fairs and Public Events Fairs conti
Page 41 and 42: Together, these projects will creat
Page 43: urn will be conducted by CALFIRE, N
Page 47 and 48: will be target that enhance fire su
Page 49 and 50: SECTION V: PRE FIRE MANAGEMENT TACT
Page 51 and 52: Ignition management In order to bet
Page 53 and 54: Ignition Management Plan Battalion
Page 55 and 56: Sutter County Placer County nm Rail
Page 57 and 58: Equipment 14% 34 Railroad 0% Vehicl
Page 59 and 60: arrestor laws. The focus will be tr
Page 63 and 64: da City Valley Valley s Valley Moun
Page 65 and 66: Vehicle 25% Railroad 0% Equipment 1
Page 67 and 68: inspectors conducting residential i
Page 71 and 72: ?¤ MERLE COLLINS RES Battalion 231
Page 73 and 74: Mitigation Strategies 1. Public Edu
Page 75 and 76: Table. 3 - Battalion 11 Fuel Modifi
Page 77 and 78: e done, but often delay burning unt
Page 79 and 80: S ES Oregon Peak COM/LO Dobbins FFS
Page 81 and 82: Mitigation Strategies 1. Public Edu
Page 83 and 84: Table 4 - Battalion 13 Fuel Modific
Page 85 and 86: The Division Supervisor that was re
Page 87 and 88: negligence were filed against Pacif
Page 89 and 90: nm ?Î Live Oak AÚ Yuba City Sutte
Page 91 and 92: Mitigation Strategies There are sev
Page 93 and 94: Vegetation Management: UC Field Sta
Page 95 and 96:
Ignition Management Plan Battalion
Page 97 and 98:
LY CREEK RES EEK RES ada City FFS #
Page 99 and 100:
Mitigation Strategies 1. Public Edu
Page 101 and 102:
B. Installation and Maintenance of
Page 103 and 104:
The purpose of Cal Fire’s Califor
Page 105 and 106:
Y 20 # Lookouts Incorperated Cities
Page 107 and 108:
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Railroad 0% Ve
Page 109 and 110:
• Reduce the wildland fuel loadin
Page 111 and 112:
Homes would have been critically th
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
?Î Battalion 2319 # Lookouts Incor
Page 117 and 118:
Mitigation Strategies Fire Protecti
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
FAR WEST RES ?¤ nm Battalion Incor
Page 123 and 124:
Equipment 31% 80 70 60 50 40 30 20
Page 125 and 126:
2011 Action Plan: • Work with Uni
Page 127 and 128:
Battalion o AAB # k ECC Lookouts In
Page 129 and 130:
Equipment 18% Vehicle 20% Arson 14%
Page 131 and 132:
School organized functions i.e., Re
Page 133 and 134:
NEU Pre Fire Planning PRIORTY: 2 De
Page 135 and 136:
APPENDIX C: PRIORITY GOALS AND OBJE
Page 137 and 138:
a) Educate landowners, residents an
Page 139 and 140:
B. SACRAMENTO PROGRAMS AND STAFF OR
Page 141 and 142:
B. UNITS ONLY Goal 5: Develop a met
Page 143 and 144:
a) Establish a working group, consi
Page 145 and 146:
APPENDICES D-Z APPENDIX D Standards
Page 147 and 148:
shall be constructed of nonflammabl
Page 149 and 150:
Brush: Black Oak - higher leaf surf
Page 151 and 152:
916.5, 936.5, 956.5 Procedures for
Page 153 and 154:
132
Page 155 and 156:
Appendix G - Project Description MA
Page 157 and 158:
Appendix H - Project Description ES
Page 159 and 160:
2. Educate the homeowners of the st
Page 161 and 162:
(2006) as the community has begun t
Page 163 and 164:
The final option for the landowners
Page 165 and 166:
to provide chipping services throug
Page 167 and 168:
The most recent grant for Defensibl
Page 169 and 170:
Appendix N - Project Description DE
Page 171 and 172:
program at the time of the inspecti
Page 173 and 174:
Nevada County. These funds will be
Page 175 and 176:
Appendix Q - Project Description SE
Page 177 and 178:
Appendix S - Project Description YU
Page 179 and 180:
Association 1015 Trails End/Wilson
Page 181 and 182:
Dover Scotts Flat Pine Group #1 Ton
Page 183 and 184:
Appendix U - Cooperator Projects: P
Page 185 and 186:
Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way
Page 187 and 188:
2010 Skylandia 2010 Highlands TCPUD
Page 189 and 190:
Gills Hill Fuel Break Northstar CDC
Page 191 and 192:
2009 Northstar 5B Block 7 Unknown P
Page 193 and 194:
2010-2011 Firewise 2010-2011 Columb
Page 195 and 196:
2006-2007 Special Needs Assistance
Page 197 and 198:
Yuba County Public Works Project Na
Page 200 and 201:
I. General II. Objectives III. Plan
Page 202 and 203:
♦ Option “B” • The Unit wil
Page 204 and 205:
VIII. Ordering & Logistics • Reso
Page 206 and 207:
RESOURCE MGT NEVADA DIVISION NEVADA
Page 208 and 209:
nm ?é Battalion Incorperated Citie
show all

Nevada-Yuba-Placer Strategic Fire Plan 2011 - Board of Forestry ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?