04.07.2013 Views

The World Wide World: IT Ain't Just the Web ... - Cdn.oreilly.com

The World Wide World: IT Ain't Just the Web ... - Cdn.oreilly.com

The World Wide World: IT Ain't Just the Web ... - Cdn.oreilly.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in business-model terms, he realized that <strong>the</strong> old-school union model made no<br />

sense in a world of labor surplus.<br />

<strong>The</strong> old models of power struggle were mass-market: workers against employers,<br />

with <strong>the</strong> government taking <strong>the</strong> side of one or <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. But in today’s modern<br />

world, says Stern, <strong>the</strong> struggles are more granular. Even governments can’t hold <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

own against some modern corporations.<br />

So Stern has been changing <strong>the</strong> shape of engagement by going after industries as a<br />

whole in a region, that is, taking on all <strong>the</strong> janitorial services in <strong>the</strong> New York region<br />

simultaneously – and after <strong>com</strong>panies as a whole across geographies. Often <strong>the</strong><br />

employers don’t mind paying up – as long as <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>com</strong>petition does, too: “<strong>The</strong>re was<br />

a time when we literally blocked <strong>the</strong> bridges leading into Washington, DC, to win<br />

raises for SEIU janitors. But we also recognized <strong>the</strong>re was a time to reach out to<br />

those same employers and to work with <strong>the</strong>m. We know that many employers care<br />

about <strong>the</strong>ir workers and want to raise wages; <strong>the</strong>y just need to be able to keep <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

customers, too.”<br />

Likewise, he is using international arbitrage (so to speak) to pursue better wages and<br />

standards for <strong>the</strong> US-based employees of <strong>the</strong> French <strong>com</strong>pany Sodexho. He persuaded<br />

labor allies in Europe to put pressure on Sodexho in Paris – where <strong>the</strong> <strong>com</strong>pany’s<br />

senior executives and board members live – to get <strong>the</strong> talks started. His message to<br />

Sodexho: “We can help one ano<strong>the</strong>r. Everybody wins when job standards are higher.”<br />

In high technology, things are even more <strong>com</strong>plicated when you consider <strong>the</strong> international<br />

aspect. Though Stern has been to China, he doesn’t see wages rising <strong>the</strong>re –<br />

at least not enough to forestall a corresponding drop in US wages: “<strong>The</strong> gap is so<br />

large. <strong>The</strong>re’s nothing to force wages up anytime soon. It could take forever.” As<br />

Diana Farrell of McKinsey argued last year, Chinese workers are also consumers of<br />

US products and <strong>the</strong> net effect of globalization may be positive, but <strong>the</strong> impact on<br />

some individual US workers may be severe. She mentioned a need for better unemployment<br />

insurance and training for US workers in palliation, but no one has risen<br />

to that challenge. . .until now.<br />

Stern wants to unionize <strong>the</strong> <strong>IT</strong> industry – not to set wages, but to sponsor some kind<br />

of industry-wide fund that would deal with <strong>the</strong> underlying problems: short-term<br />

job losses and long-term training needs. “We’re not going to <strong>com</strong>e over to your place<br />

and set work rules and measure <strong>the</strong> distances between <strong>com</strong>puters,” he says. “But we<br />

want to help <strong>the</strong> industry work toge<strong>the</strong>r to solve <strong>the</strong>se problems. It’s not a short-<br />

MARCH 2005 RELEASE 1.0 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!