12.07.2013 Views

He Shall Have Dominion

Kenneth L. Gentry

Kenneth L. Gentry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Venema continues this line of critique by noting that the passages<br />

that “speak of Christ’s kingship refer to the entire present age<br />

subsequent to Christ’s ascension and prior to his return at the end of the<br />

age.” <strong>He</strong> then cites Philippians 2:9–11 and comments: “This description<br />

of Christ’s exaltation defines his present glory, not one that is reserved<br />

29<br />

to the future in any new or distinguishable sense.” I agree. The personal<br />

glory of Christ himself does not change over time. Postmillennialism<br />

never suggests that it does.<br />

But we are talking about eschatology, not Christology. And as a matter<br />

of fact, the manifestation of his rule on the earth through time does develop.<br />

Does not Christ himself refer to his kingdom as a mustard seed that “is<br />

smaller than all other seeds” only to note that “when it is full grown, it<br />

is larger than the garden plants, and becomes a tree” (Mt 13:32)? This<br />

requires us to reflect on its growth and development. Does this not require<br />

us to conceive of his kingdom as small and insignificant in its beginning<br />

and large and dominant in its later development? And does not he<br />

compare it to leaven which works in meal “until it was all leavened” (Mt<br />

13:33)?<br />

Strimple claims that postmillennialism contradicts itself in equating<br />

the millennial era with the church age kingdom: “If the ‘Millennium’ in<br />

the Bible refers to the entire Christian era, the ‘millennial conditions’ that<br />

must prevail before Christ returns would seem to be those conditions<br />

30<br />

that prevail now.” Well, yes and no. That is, the “millennium” certainly<br />

prevails now. And “millennial conditions” are present — but only in seed<br />

form. Much like we as individuals are presently sanctified on earth (1Co<br />

1:2; 6:11; <strong>He</strong>b 10:14), are being progressively sanctified in history (Jn<br />

17:19; <strong>He</strong>b 12:14), and will ultimately be perfectly sanctified in heaven<br />

(Ac 20:32; 26:18). If we can be sanctified while growing in sanctification<br />

(Ep 5:26; 1Th 5:23; 1Pe 2:2), why cannot “millennial conditions” be<br />

present while growing in influence? As I note above, the kingdom develops<br />

over time; consequently, the “millennial conditions” will mature over<br />

time. This is why the Lord commands his disciples: “go therefore and<br />

make disciples of all the nations,” for he promises: “I will build My<br />

church” (Mt 16:18).<br />

Venema surmises that the developing glory that postmillennialism<br />

expects implies some additional “intervening” age in the outworking of<br />

29. Venema, Promise of the Future, 343.<br />

30. Strimple in Bock, Three Views of the Millennium and Beyond, 71.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!