Master of Science - ETD | Electronic Theses and Dissertations of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Sl No ii. Commission Paid :Rs. iii. Tax Paid :Rs. iv. Any Other Charges:Rs. Total Cost (C) :Rs. Total Cost :Rs. Gross Returns: Sl No Product Qty (Qtls) Rate (Rs.) 1. Main Product 2. By-Product 3. Total 4. Total Returns 5. Net Returns VI. Impact of Farm Ponds in taking the activity of Animal Husbandry: Type 1 Bullock 2 Cow 3 Buffaloes 4 Sheep 5 Goat 6 Poultry Local (No) Cross Breed (No) Purchase Price (Rs) Milk Sold / Month (Liter) VII. Farmers perception about the benefits of the RWHS Gross returns per year Amount (Rs.) Cost of Maintenance Sl. No. Benefits Perception of RWHS No. of respondents Percentage H M L H M L 1. Reduced soil erosion 2. Maintenance of common assets 3. Increased moisture availability 4. Increased ground water recharge 5. Increased yield 6. Increased employment 7. Increased income Note: H = Higher, M = Moderate, L = Lower
VIII. Constraints for non-adoption of RWHS Non-adoption of RWHS Sl. Benefits No. of respondents Percentage No. S MS NS S MS NS 1. Not aware of technology 2. Technology not suitable 3. Heavy investment 4. Lack of credit availability 5. Poor soil fertility 6. Fragmented land holdings 7. High labour rates 8. Improper extension service 9. Long gestation period Note: H = Higher, M = Moderate, L = Lower Sl No IX. Details of RWHS taken on the farm: Different RWHS Units 1 Contour bund Mt 2 Rubble checks No 3 Farm Ponds No 4 Diversion Channels Mt 5 Check Dam No 6 Percolation tanks No 7 Nalabunding No 8 Sunken ponds No Number & Dimensi on Year of Constru ction Investm ent Source of Improvement Investm ent Year Cost Function al or Non function al Reason s if non functioni ng
Page 1 and 2:
AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF RAIN WATER
Page 3 and 4:
Chapter No. C O N T E N T S Title P
Page 5 and 6:
Figure No. LIST OF FIGURES Title Be
Page 7 and 8:
Appendi x No. LIST OF APPENDICES Ti
Page 9 and 10:
agriculture. An improved crop produ
Page 11 and 12:
Therefore, the results of the study
Page 13 and 14:
Prasad (1994) opined that watershed
Page 15 and 16:
vistas of productive and remunerati
Page 17 and 18:
conservation measures on watershed
Page 19 and 20: III. METHODOLOGY The design of the
Page 21 and 22: Table 3.1 Land utilization pattern
Page 23 and 24: district canals are the major sourc
Page 25 and 26: Fig. 2. Showing districts covered u
Page 27 and 28: 3.3 Sampling design For the present
Page 29 and 30: If the benefit cost ratio of the wa
Page 31 and 32: 3.6.15 Seed Farm produced seed has
Page 33 and 34: Plate 4. Nala bunding Plate 5. Rese
Page 35 and 36: Table 4.1. Age and education status
Page 37 and 38: Table 4.2. Family type and size of
Page 39 and 40: Table 4.4. Extent of use of RWHS in
Page 41 and 42: Table 4.5. Investment on RWHS throu
Page 43 and 44: 4.4.3 Productivity of major crops T
Page 45 and 46: Area (ha) Yield (q/ha) 160 140 120
Page 47 and 48: Table 4.10. Cost and returns profil
Page 49 and 50: Table 4.12. Cost and returns profil
Page 51 and 52: Table 4.14. Employment levels in di
Page 53 and 54: V. DISCUSSION The results of the st
Page 55 and 56: A critical observation of cost and
Page 57 and 58: VI. SUMMARY AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Page 59 and 60: Farm-ponds were found to have posit
Page 61 and 62: HAZRA, C.R., 1997, Sustainable agri
Page 63 and 64: SHARMA, H.C. AND HOOJA, R., 1981, W
Page 65 and 66: IV. Important Crops, Area, Yield an
Page 67 and 68: Sl No Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 Education G
Page 69: Crop: __________ Variety: _________
Page 73 and 74: APPENDIX III Per ha cost of cultiva
Page 75 and 76: APPENDIX V Per ha cost of cultivati
Page 77: An economic analysis of rain water
show all

Master of Science - ETD | Electronic Theses and Dissertations of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?