22.07.2013 Views

Max Planck Institute for Astronomy - Annual Report 2007

Max Planck Institute for Astronomy - Annual Report 2007

Max Planck Institute for Astronomy - Annual Report 2007

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FeII / MgII<br />

unknown interactive relationship. From the new data,<br />

these mass values can be ascertained in three different<br />

ways:<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Dietrich et al. 2003<br />

Maiolino et. al. 2003<br />

Freudling et. al. 2003<br />

Iwamuro et. al. 2004<br />

Barth et. al. 2003<br />

This work<br />

Iwamuro et al. 2002<br />

Thompson et al. 1999<br />

1 2 3<br />

Redshift z<br />

4 5 6<br />

Fig. II.6.4: The Fe II/Mg II line ratio as a function of redshifting.<br />

The five values of the recent study around z 6 are represented<br />

in yellow by a circled x.<br />

The most direct method consists of determining<br />

the complete bolometric luminosity of the quasars.<br />

If one assumes that the black hole gathers material<br />

from its surroundings at the maximum rate possible,<br />

then radiation pressure and gravity are held in balance.<br />

One says then that the quasar is radiating at<br />

its Eddington Luminosity. If one sets the Eddington<br />

Luminosity equal to the bolometric luminosity, then<br />

one obtains the minimal mass that black holes must<br />

have in order to reach the observed luminosity.<br />

A different method relies on the fact that black holes<br />

are surrounded by a region of gas in which the quasar’s<br />

emission lines are <strong>for</strong>med. This region is called<br />

the Broad Line Region (BLR) because the lines of<br />

this region are strongly broadened through rapid<br />

rotation. The central mass can be derived from the<br />

radius of the BLR and the velocity of the gas that<br />

is contained therein. Both quantities can be derived,<br />

subject to certain assumptions, from the spectrum,<br />

especially from the width of the Mg II line. The central<br />

mass then results from the BLR’s radius and the<br />

velocity of the gas.<br />

A third method depends on an empirical relation be-<br />

tween the central mass and the continuum luminosity<br />

at a wavelength of 135 nm and the width of the C-IV<br />

line. Here, too, BLR characteristics are used.<br />

All three methods were applied to the spectra of five<br />

quasars. Because each of them contains some uncertainties,<br />

they yield – as would be expected – different mass<br />

values (typically different by factors of two or three),<br />

although the CIV based method provided the largest<br />

values in all cases. Overall, the result was a range of<br />

300 million to 5.2 billion solar masses. The 300 million<br />

II.6. Black Hole Activity in Quasars at High Redshift 47<br />

solar masses represented the smallest value so far among<br />

highly redshifted quasars. Nevertheless in most cases<br />

very high mass values resulted, which points to a surprisingly<br />

fast growth of supermassive black holes after<br />

the big bang. To compare: the black hole in the center<br />

of our galaxy has a mass of 3.6 million solar masses. To<br />

explain this phenomenon of rapid growth is one of the<br />

most urgent tasks of cosmology.<br />

In this context, it would be very interesting to find<br />

out whether, in these highly redshifted quasars, the<br />

a<strong>for</strong>ementioned correlations between the masses of the<br />

black holes and the masses and velocity dispersions<br />

of the bulges have validity: question that is difficult to<br />

answer because corresponding measurements relating to<br />

these extremely distant quasars are still rather inexact.<br />

The mass of the bulges can be estimated with the help<br />

of observations of molecular gas in the galaxies, such<br />

as Dominik Riechers was able to show in 2006 (<strong>Annual</strong><br />

<strong>Report</strong> 2006, p. 40).<br />

The results so far point to the fact that the redshifted<br />

galaxies deviate from the known relation between the<br />

masses of black holes and the masses and velocity<br />

dispersions of the bulges. Based on these results, the<br />

implication is that the black holes develop faster than the<br />

galaxy bulges. Yet the results are still disputed and computer<br />

simulations cannot yet deliver clear predictions.<br />

If these initial suspicions are confirmed, then the following<br />

fascinating questions follow: Did the black holes<br />

come first and then <strong>for</strong>m into galaxies? Did black holes<br />

have the possible effect of “condensation seeds” around<br />

which the galaxies <strong>for</strong>med? MPIA research teams are<br />

pursuing these gripping questions and initial results are<br />

expected in the near future.<br />

Quasar Activity Periods<br />

Earlier research, led by American astronomers who are<br />

also a part of the team, of 23 quasars with redshifting<br />

around z 6 revealed, in all cases, deep Gunn-Peterson<br />

troughs. From this one can conclude that the intergalactic<br />

medium up to the proximity of the quasars is<br />

overwhelmingly neutral. At the same time it has become<br />

clear that the reionization of the medium through<br />

energy-rich radiation must have been a complex process<br />

that spanned a longer period.<br />

What quasars contributed to the reionization is a much<br />

discussed question today. After the “switching on” of the<br />

UV and X-ray radiation, the black hole, or rather the accretion<br />

disk surrounding it, created around itself a consistently<br />

expanding sphere of ionized gases in the then<br />

(z 6) still largely neutral intergalactic medium: a socalled<br />

Strömgren sphere, the radius of which is marked<br />

by the long wave (red) edge of the Gunn-Peterson trough<br />

in the continuum spectrum. Yet the determination of an<br />

absorption edge is not simple, because the absorption is<br />

often incomplete (Fig. II.6.5).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!