24.07.2013 Views

amj Australasian Marketing Journal - ANZMAC

amj Australasian Marketing Journal - ANZMAC

amj Australasian Marketing Journal - ANZMAC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ularly in a text that gave so much attention to measures.<br />

A number of other omissions troubled me. The brand, product<br />

and customer perspectives needed to be betteranalysed. For<br />

example, brand loyalty was adequately treated but customer<br />

loyalty was not explained except for the Dick and Basu<br />

(1994) model in the slides (under brand loyalty). This omission<br />

reflected the lack of detailed consideration of issues<br />

stemming from the relationship marketing perspective.<br />

Customer retention is much talked about in industry, usually<br />

with a genuflection toward Reichheld (1996), and this<br />

suggests to me that the matter needs more comment in a text<br />

of this sort. Another omission was planned behaviour theory<br />

(Ajzen 1991). The text dealt with its predecessor (reasoned<br />

action) and the more esoteric theory of trying; it should have<br />

focused on the widely used and up-to-date theory of planned<br />

behaviour and given examples of its application. And what<br />

about the mathematical approaches? Despite the extensive<br />

treatment of diffusion there was no mention of the Bass<br />

model; similarly the Dirichlet was not discussed in the text<br />

though it appeared briefly in a case where the purchase incidence<br />

and brand choice of Japanese consumers is discussed.<br />

Supporting material<br />

The PowerPoint slides (prepared by Jennifer Thornton) were<br />

admirably clear and mostly avoided the distracting clip art<br />

and transition effects that are often used to excess in this<br />

medium. Some of the slides were a bit busy but there was<br />

nothing to stop a lecturer from adapting them. In general, they<br />

summarised the corresponding chapter and sometimes introduced<br />

a slightly different slant when compared with the book.<br />

However, there was little animation, no hyperlinking to the<br />

Internet or jumping to software, and no use of sound or video.<br />

I think that the more exotic features of PowerPoint are now<br />

more widely used and there is a real opportunity to introduce<br />

TV advertising, interviews and other dynamic material into<br />

PowerPoint. Traditional publishers need to give more thought<br />

to this since these additions will aid learning and sell texts.<br />

And academics with particular expertise need to provide<br />

video clips that can be used. I found the instructor s manual<br />

less useful than the PowerPoint slides. Much of the manual<br />

seemed to summarise the corresponding chapter and there<br />

was no need for this. Most lecturers find that undergraduates<br />

are reluctant to talk and ideas for practical activities are a<br />

boon; these were provided in the textbook and the additional<br />

suggestions in the instructor s manual added little.<br />

Overall assessment<br />

This book meets the requirements of lecturers who share the<br />

partly implicit assumptions of the authors that the subject is a<br />

continuation of marketing into social science and that a textbook<br />

should lay out related ideas, mainly from psychology<br />

and sociology, in a clear, descriptive and relatively uncritical<br />

manner. This is the widely accepted formula for consumer<br />

behaviour, which has evolved from foundation courses in<br />

Book Reviews<br />

pure psychology and social science. This treatment works<br />

quite well for sociological work but rather less well for<br />

psychology, which needs to be given a more hypotheticodeductive,<br />

theory-driven introduction. However, I do not<br />

think that this widely accepted view of consumer behaviour is<br />

sufficiently critical or demanding when the subject is taught<br />

as an end-of-course elective; then, I believe that there is merit<br />

in an alternative approach that starts with the marketing problem<br />

and makes more direct use of academic research in<br />

marketing.<br />

An alternative approach<br />

<strong>Marketing</strong> is a prescriptive discipline, like medicine or education.<br />

It must have a praxis, a body of do s and don ts covering<br />

positioning, segmentation, promotional spending etc and textbooks<br />

in marketing must meet this requirement. But, like<br />

medicine or education, there is a concurrent requirement to<br />

research the applications and integrate any findings into the<br />

curriculum. <strong>Marketing</strong> researchers do this but their work<br />

seems to be poorly used in undergraduate and MBA teaching.<br />

I see consumer behaviour as an evidence-based subject that<br />

uses this research and explains how consumers respond to<br />

marketing interventions. We should start with problems in<br />

marketing and follow these through, drawing on any social<br />

science or mathematical methods that help with the solution.<br />

Most textbooks in consumer behaviour do not do this. The<br />

way they cite papers illustrates their approach. A quick check<br />

of post-1997 texts shows that, with the honourable exception<br />

of Kardes (1998), consumer behaviour textbooks use the<br />

convention of removing references from the body of the text<br />

and putting them in a Notes section at the end of the chapter<br />

or book. This ensures that they are mostly not read and cannot<br />

be integrated into the argument. This practice may work for<br />

company reports but I have never seen any justification for it<br />

in textbooks. Removal of references from the text is a device<br />

for dumbing down. Unless the study is cited properly, it is<br />

difficult to discuss it in any detail and relate it to other studies.<br />

As a result, conclusions are stated and the alternative<br />

possibilities that attend any research or practice, which<br />

provide the basis for progress, are omitted. It is true that the<br />

books that use the references in text approach are harder but,<br />

if we take bright students into business courses, we have an<br />

obligation to make intellectual demands on them. The<br />

demands that we make should be commensurate with those<br />

that are made in other subjects such as economics and<br />

psychology.<br />

A second advantage of this approach is that much of the<br />

curriculum that is found in the standard textbooks can be<br />

dropped or can be taught in the first year as a social science<br />

course. Marketers do not use Maslow or Hertzberg, and they<br />

do not apply the extended box models that supposedly explain<br />

consumer choice. Personality analyses are of little relevance<br />

to practitioners. Similarly, Dichter and his psychoanalytic<br />

interpretation of consumer behaviour can be abandoned.<br />

<strong>Australasian</strong> <strong>Marketing</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> 9 (1), 2001 79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!