- Page 1: Preaspiration in the Nordic Languag
- Page 5: Abstract Preaspiration—the produc
- Page 8 and 9: 3.8 CELTIC LANGUAGES...............
- Page 11 and 12: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like
- Page 13 and 14: 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview This st
- Page 15 and 16: - 3 - Reykjavík Hrísey ICELAND We
- Page 17 and 18: Such characteristics in the formati
- Page 19 and 20: In most respects, the general descr
- Page 21: ment that has emerged in each langu
- Page 24 and 25: Reitan 1930:67f). But, as with prac
- Page 26 and 27: For comparison, let us consider pos
- Page 28 and 29: postaspiration tend to have equally
- Page 30 and 31: Oral pass. Voicing Icel. labba: l
- Page 32 and 33: Oral pass. Velum Voicing Icel. lamb
- Page 34 and 35: these terms are used mostly in conj
- Page 36 and 37: described is true preaspiration (as
- Page 38 and 39: Eastern Ojibwa sets itself apart fr
- Page 40 and 41: As to preaspirated stops in Chechen
- Page 42 and 43: stops if the preceding word ends in
- Page 44 and 45: Precoda, 1989). The languages in qu
- Page 46 and 47: “normal” unaspirated, voiceless
- Page 48 and 49: suited for communicative purposes.
- Page 50 and 51: are better discriminated than are a
- Page 52 and 53:
Lastly, even if we are truly better
- Page 55 and 56:
3 PREASPIRATION IN NORTHWESTERN EUR
- Page 57 and 58:
work on my part since glosses appea
- Page 59 and 60:
awareness of Icelandic preaspiratio
- Page 61 and 62:
occur only after short vowels, and
- Page 63 and 64:
of disyllabic words embedded in fra
- Page 65 and 66:
3.2.2 The perception of Icelandic p
- Page 67 and 68:
vowel (i.e., [i] or [u]). All other
- Page 69 and 70:
Two out of the four subjects (EI an
- Page 71 and 72:
[ma] mata ‘feed,’ [jøkl] jökl
- Page 73 and 74:
mant for his examples, but makes it
- Page 75 and 76:
laterals are voiceless in such posi
- Page 77 and 78:
duration (Pr) plotted against the c
- Page 79 and 80:
(Hesselman 1901 & 1902, Riad 1992).
- Page 81 and 82:
in the Gudbrandsdalen dialects, as
- Page 83 and 84:
According to the segmentation crite
- Page 85 and 86:
preaspiration in this dialect shoul
- Page 87 and 88:
As a result, the Vemdalen dialect h
- Page 89 and 90:
(neut.)’ and sfe ‘released.’
- Page 91 and 92:
Arjeplog dialect. Their findings su
- Page 93 and 94:
latter half voiceless. As for the f
- Page 95 and 96:
amples include b ‘old man’ and
- Page 97 and 98:
instead as a preaspirated or an una
- Page 99 and 100:
consonants that tended to occur on
- Page 101 and 102:
than in men’s. 1 My own impressio
- Page 103 and 104:
For the remaining 17 dialects, Wret
- Page 105 and 106:
Table 3-11. The findings of van Dom
- Page 107 and 108:
tokens for the group of younger fem
- Page 109 and 110:
Investigations of preaspiration dur
- Page 111 and 112:
According to Ní Chasaide & Ó Doch
- Page 113 and 114:
The development of overlong stops i
- Page 115 and 116:
excess of 100 ms), and unaspirated
- Page 117 and 118:
4 PREASPIRATION - DATA In this chap
- Page 119 and 120:
author. Further details on the map-
- Page 121 and 122:
Stop release h h Figure 4-2
- Page 123 and 124:
the present work display VPr durati
- Page 125 and 126:
Table 4-1. Overview of the data on
- Page 127 and 128:
had an intermediate mean of 52 ms.
- Page 129 and 130:
Figure 4-5 shows two examples of a
- Page 131 and 132:
(although there are several tokens
- Page 133 and 134:
åten type words, MP’s mean VPrO
- Page 135 and 136:
plement preaspiration ratios, such
- Page 137 and 138:
Pr duration (ms) Pr duration (ms) P
- Page 139 and 140:
same data as the results presented
- Page 141 and 142:
of FS’s and CK’s productions of
- Page 143 and 144:
offset is perceptually salient when
- Page 145 and 146:
produces an /lt/-sequence). MP also
- Page 147 and 148:
Table 4-9. Mean postaspiration dura
- Page 149 and 150:
tainly due to the fact that the CSw
- Page 151 and 152:
v s Figure 4-26. Subj. CK: […
- Page 153 and 154:
GT’s production of dungar ‘grov
- Page 155 and 156:
follows. Possibly, place of articul
- Page 157 and 158:
nasal /d/ is dropped completely (i.
- Page 159 and 160:
contains an analysis of data on the
- Page 161 and 162:
are discussed below, and an overvie
- Page 163 and 164:
initially rather than word-medially
- Page 165 and 166:
separation line between preaspirate
- Page 167 and 168:
(i.e., preaspiration > 15 ms), and
- Page 169 and 170:
Pr duration (ms) Pr-dur (ms) Pr dur
- Page 171 and 172:
unaspirated. In a further 44 instan
- Page 173 and 174:
epresentation is [h], but is more c
- Page 175 and 176:
ishes sharply. This point is referr
- Page 177 and 178:
In Figure 4-50 (in which the same s
- Page 179 and 180:
The emphasis here has been on insta
- Page 181 and 182:
durations. Very short periods of fr
- Page 183 and 184:
preaspiration duration is approxima
- Page 185 and 186:
these examples are roughly as indic
- Page 187 and 188:
l Figure 4-69. Subj. JM: […slo
- Page 189 and 190:
voiced portion is often heavily fri
- Page 191 and 192:
For lenis stops, it is quite common
- Page 193 and 194:
Table 4-15. Mean preaspiration dura
- Page 195 and 196:
Pr duration (ms) 160 120 80 40 0 0
- Page 197 and 198:
The measurements of CSw also show t
- Page 199 and 200:
Lenis Fortis Fortis geminate single
- Page 201 and 202:
e discussed in the following sectio
- Page 203 and 204:
produced by ES is quite different f
- Page 205 and 206:
The example in Figure 4-90 contains
- Page 207 and 208:
as laughter during production and e
- Page 209 and 210:
that word-medial postaspirations ar
- Page 211 and 212:
for word-medial stops in VC syllabl
- Page 213 and 214:
The results from the Western Åland
- Page 215 and 216:
trade-off effect between preaspirat
- Page 217 and 218:
the ON word-medial voiced fricative
- Page 219 and 220:
impressionistic observations of the
- Page 221 and 222:
4 2 4 1 2 3 4 5 r+p, t,k r+p, t,k;l
- Page 223 and 224:
in CSw—and it has been shown that
- Page 225 and 226:
5 FROM OLD NORSE TO THE PRESENT 5.1
- Page 227 and 228:
Some thoughts will also be offered
- Page 229 and 230:
their orthographic presentation. Th
- Page 231 and 232:
dialects with (normative) preaspira
- Page 233 and 234:
singleton stops. Drawing on the ide
- Page 235 and 236:
of the type we find in Central Stan
- Page 237 and 238:
egarding phonetic expression of the
- Page 239 and 240:
the geminate lenes tended to be pro
- Page 241 and 242:
in the production of the units dimi
- Page 243 and 244:
synchronised with oral closure. In
- Page 245 and 246:
phonological reorganisation for the
- Page 247 and 248:
In this illustration, the change is
- Page 249 and 250:
The case of preaspiration can be de
- Page 251 and 252:
others. In this way, some speakers
- Page 253 and 254:
Although phonemic merger may be the
- Page 255 and 256:
REFERENCES Alvarez, Albert & Kennet
- Page 257 and 258:
Elert, Claes-Christian. 1957. “Bi
- Page 259 and 260:
Helgason, Pétur & Klaus J. Kohler.
- Page 261 and 262:
—. 1956. Juraksamojedisches Wört
- Page 263 and 264:
—. 1956. “The Gaelic of Leurbos
- Page 265 and 266:
Roos, Marti. 1998. “Preaspiration
- Page 267:
Wallström, Sigvard. 1943. Studier