Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>the</strong>se terms are used mostly <strong>in</strong> conjunction with aspiration (pre- <strong>and</strong><br />
postaspiration), but ideally should be generally applicable <strong>in</strong> phonetics.<br />
Still, <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition will undoubtedly show weaknesses <strong>in</strong> some situations,<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> terms it employs, “phonetic trait” <strong>and</strong> “dialect,” are <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />
not always easily def<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
None<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>ction between normative <strong>and</strong> non-normative<br />
traits has been found useful <strong>in</strong> discuss<strong>in</strong>g aspiration. The l<strong>in</strong>guistic<br />
groups focused on here are def<strong>in</strong>ed on <strong>the</strong> basis of geographical <strong>and</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic<br />
criteria, similar to those used to establish “traditional” dialectal<br />
divisions. These groups are Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Icel<strong>and</strong>ic, Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Icel<strong>and</strong>ic, Tórshavn<br />
Faroese, Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Gräsö dialect, Central St<strong>and</strong>ard Ål<strong>and</strong> dialect<br />
<strong>and</strong> Central St<strong>and</strong>ard Swedish (henceforth CSw).<br />
In all <strong>the</strong>se dialects, <strong>the</strong> fortis stop series has normative postaspiration<br />
<strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> contexts, which vary slightly depend<strong>in</strong>g on dialect. Common<br />
to all is postaspiration on fortis stops <strong>in</strong> word-<strong>in</strong>itial position <strong>and</strong><br />
before stressed vowels. These stops can be said to be normatively postaspirated,<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce a failure to aspirate properly would be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as deviant<br />
(e.g., as with a foreign accent) by <strong>the</strong> native speakers of <strong>the</strong> dialect.<br />
They contrast with lenis stops, which lack postaspiration (<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
positions) <strong>and</strong> which may be voiced or voiceless depend<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
dialect. This yields m<strong>in</strong>imal pairs such as:<br />
Faroese [la] 1<br />
[la] (‘to speak’ vs ‘to wane’)<br />
Icel<strong>and</strong>ic [p] [p] (‘pair’ vs. ‘bar’)<br />
CSw [œm] [œm] (‘to empty’ vs. ‘to judge’)<br />
[kn] [n] (‘hurricane’ vs. ‘organ’)<br />
The two stop series are traditionally referred to as fortis <strong>and</strong> lenis,<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> absence of unify<strong>in</strong>g phonetic criteria for <strong>the</strong>se stop contrasts (a<br />
fact that becomes even more evident <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g paragraph), <strong>the</strong> traditional<br />
term<strong>in</strong>ology will be adhered to.<br />
Word-<strong>in</strong>ternally, especially <strong>in</strong>tervocalically after stressed vowels, <strong>the</strong><br />
expression of fortis stops <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se dialects is much more complex. Some<br />
1 The four-spoked asterisk is used to <strong>in</strong>dicate that <strong>the</strong> example be<strong>in</strong>g transcribed does<br />
not occur <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> recorded data, but is an “<strong>in</strong>vention” of <strong>the</strong> author. This is expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />
more detail <strong>in</strong> section 3.1.<br />
– 22 –