26.07.2013 Views

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“normal” unaspirated, voiceless stops. For Halh Mongolian, for example,<br />

which Svantesson & Karlsson (2002) have shown has normatively preaspirated<br />

stops, two divergent descriptions of <strong>the</strong> “strong” vs. “weak”<br />

contrast exist. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Svantesson & Karlsson, Ramstedt (1902) described<br />

<strong>the</strong> strong series as postaspirated <strong>in</strong> word-<strong>in</strong>itial position, <strong>and</strong><br />

pre- <strong>and</strong> postaspirated <strong>in</strong> word-medial position. This description is<br />

echoed <strong>in</strong> Vladimircov (1929), Poppe (1936, 1951) <strong>and</strong> Sanzheev (1953).<br />

However, it seems that <strong>the</strong>re is a more widespread belief that <strong>the</strong> strong<br />

vs. weak contrast is expressed as voiceless vs. voiced stop <strong>in</strong> all positions.<br />

This characterisation of <strong>the</strong> contrast can be found <strong>in</strong>, for example,<br />

Rudnev (1905), Hattori (1943) <strong>and</strong> Todaeva (1951). Thus, although<br />

Ramstedt had correctly identified <strong>the</strong> occurrence of preaspirated stops <strong>in</strong><br />

Halh Mongolian, this did not prevent <strong>the</strong> less correct description of stops<br />

such as simply voiceless unaspirated (contrast<strong>in</strong>g with voiced stops)<br />

from ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ground.<br />

The case of Halh Mongolian preaspiration suggests that preaspiration<br />

is particularly difficult to detect <strong>in</strong> impressionistic analysis. It is only<br />

through <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>strumental analysis of Svantesson & Karlsson that we can<br />

confirm that <strong>the</strong>re are preaspirated stops <strong>in</strong> Halh Mongolian. S<strong>in</strong>ce most<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g phonematic descriptions of languages are based on impressionistic<br />

analyses, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g those that make up <strong>the</strong> bulk of <strong>the</strong> UPSID data,<br />

one may beg<strong>in</strong> to suspect that preaspirated stops are far more frequent <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> world’s languages than has hi<strong>the</strong>rto been thought.<br />

But even if normatively preaspirated stops occur more frequently<br />

than was previously believed, <strong>the</strong>y may still be relatively rare. And, as I<br />

have claimed, preaspiration seems to be a subtle, almost evasive phonetic<br />

trait that tends to escape detection <strong>in</strong> auditory analysis. The apparent rarity<br />

<strong>and</strong> elusiveness of preaspirated stops may have to do with <strong>the</strong> perceptual<br />

characteristics of <strong>the</strong> preaspiration noise. Is it hard to hear<br />

preaspiration? And is this <strong>the</strong> reason for its apparent rarity? These questions<br />

are considered <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g section.<br />

– 34 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!