Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
suited for communicative purposes. This, he claims, is reflected <strong>in</strong><br />
UPSID, <strong>in</strong> which “from <strong>the</strong> 317 languages […] preaspiration is attested<br />
<strong>in</strong> only 2 or 3.” 1<br />
Bladon’s account is conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> has <strong>in</strong>tuitive appeal for those<br />
that feel, as I do, that preaspiration is a fairly unobtrusive phonetic feature<br />
that tends to escape detection. However, his claims should not be<br />
viewed uncritically, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re are problems with his approach.<br />
First, Bladon relies on UPSID for <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> frequency of<br />
occurrence of <strong>the</strong> sound pattern [h] + stop (i.e. pre-occlusive aspirations).<br />
As was discussed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g section, a problem with UPSID is its<br />
possible underestimation of <strong>the</strong> frequency of preaspiration occurrence. A<br />
more serious problem is <strong>the</strong> fact that UPSID does not conta<strong>in</strong> any <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> frequency of occurrence of hC clusters. 2 The auditory<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts Bladon proposes should apply to any VhC sequence, not<br />
only to sequences <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> h-sound happens to get classified as preaspiration<br />
(cf. discussion <strong>in</strong> section 2.1). It is <strong>in</strong> this way that <strong>the</strong> frequency<br />
of occurrence of pre-occlusive aspirations—i.e., h-sounds <strong>in</strong> hC<br />
clusters <strong>and</strong> preaspirations—is underestimated (see also Hansson (1997:9).<br />
For comparison, consider if one were <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> frequency of<br />
occurrence of pre- <strong>and</strong> post-affricated [t], e.g., [t] <strong>and</strong> [t]. UPSID tells<br />
us that 41% of languages have [t], but no pre-affricated stop [t] whatsoever<br />
is found—it is not even part of <strong>the</strong> UPSID segment <strong>in</strong>ventory. We<br />
cannot conclude from this that <strong>the</strong> sequence [t] is auditorily <strong>in</strong>ept. The<br />
reason why [t] does not show up <strong>in</strong> UPSID is not that it does not occur<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> languages of <strong>the</strong> world, but ra<strong>the</strong>r that when it does occur, l<strong>in</strong>guists<br />
seem to analyse it as a cluster <strong>in</strong>stead of a pre-affricate “segment.”<br />
1 Bladon used a version of <strong>the</strong> UPSID database that conta<strong>in</strong>ed phonological <strong>in</strong>ventories<br />
from 317 languages (cf. Maddieson 1984). In <strong>the</strong> updated UPSID (Maddieson &<br />
Precoda 1989), which has <strong>in</strong>ventories from 451 languages, only one language has<br />
preaspiration.<br />
2 It is difficult to obta<strong>in</strong> reliable estimates on how many languages allow hC clusters.<br />
The ones I am aware of <strong>in</strong>clude F<strong>in</strong>nish, Menom<strong>in</strong>i, Taba, some varieties of Spanish<br />
(esp. American), Arabic (as well as many languages that have borrowed from Arabic,<br />
e.g. Urdu, Persian <strong>and</strong> Turkish), many of <strong>the</strong> Algonquian languages, Comanche <strong>and</strong><br />
Mono, as well as some Oto-Manguean languages. This list is hardly exhaustive. My<br />
hunch is that <strong>the</strong> languages <strong>in</strong> which pre-occlusive aspirations are most appropriately<br />
analysed as clusters outnumber <strong>the</strong> languages <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y are most appropriately<br />
analysed as preaspirated stops.<br />
– 36 –