26.07.2013 Views

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

suited for communicative purposes. This, he claims, is reflected <strong>in</strong><br />

UPSID, <strong>in</strong> which “from <strong>the</strong> 317 languages […] preaspiration is attested<br />

<strong>in</strong> only 2 or 3.” 1<br />

Bladon’s account is conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> has <strong>in</strong>tuitive appeal for those<br />

that feel, as I do, that preaspiration is a fairly unobtrusive phonetic feature<br />

that tends to escape detection. However, his claims should not be<br />

viewed uncritically, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re are problems with his approach.<br />

First, Bladon relies on UPSID for <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> frequency of<br />

occurrence of <strong>the</strong> sound pattern [h] + stop (i.e. pre-occlusive aspirations).<br />

As was discussed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g section, a problem with UPSID is its<br />

possible underestimation of <strong>the</strong> frequency of preaspiration occurrence. A<br />

more serious problem is <strong>the</strong> fact that UPSID does not conta<strong>in</strong> any <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> frequency of occurrence of hC clusters. 2 The auditory<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts Bladon proposes should apply to any VhC sequence, not<br />

only to sequences <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> h-sound happens to get classified as preaspiration<br />

(cf. discussion <strong>in</strong> section 2.1). It is <strong>in</strong> this way that <strong>the</strong> frequency<br />

of occurrence of pre-occlusive aspirations—i.e., h-sounds <strong>in</strong> hC<br />

clusters <strong>and</strong> preaspirations—is underestimated (see also Hansson (1997:9).<br />

For comparison, consider if one were <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> frequency of<br />

occurrence of pre- <strong>and</strong> post-affricated [t], e.g., [t] <strong>and</strong> [t]. UPSID tells<br />

us that 41% of languages have [t], but no pre-affricated stop [t] whatsoever<br />

is found—it is not even part of <strong>the</strong> UPSID segment <strong>in</strong>ventory. We<br />

cannot conclude from this that <strong>the</strong> sequence [t] is auditorily <strong>in</strong>ept. The<br />

reason why [t] does not show up <strong>in</strong> UPSID is not that it does not occur<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> languages of <strong>the</strong> world, but ra<strong>the</strong>r that when it does occur, l<strong>in</strong>guists<br />

seem to analyse it as a cluster <strong>in</strong>stead of a pre-affricate “segment.”<br />

1 Bladon used a version of <strong>the</strong> UPSID database that conta<strong>in</strong>ed phonological <strong>in</strong>ventories<br />

from 317 languages (cf. Maddieson 1984). In <strong>the</strong> updated UPSID (Maddieson &<br />

Precoda 1989), which has <strong>in</strong>ventories from 451 languages, only one language has<br />

preaspiration.<br />

2 It is difficult to obta<strong>in</strong> reliable estimates on how many languages allow hC clusters.<br />

The ones I am aware of <strong>in</strong>clude F<strong>in</strong>nish, Menom<strong>in</strong>i, Taba, some varieties of Spanish<br />

(esp. American), Arabic (as well as many languages that have borrowed from Arabic,<br />

e.g. Urdu, Persian <strong>and</strong> Turkish), many of <strong>the</strong> Algonquian languages, Comanche <strong>and</strong><br />

Mono, as well as some Oto-Manguean languages. This list is hardly exhaustive. My<br />

hunch is that <strong>the</strong> languages <strong>in</strong> which pre-occlusive aspirations are most appropriately<br />

analysed as clusters outnumber <strong>the</strong> languages <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y are most appropriately<br />

analysed as preaspirated stops.<br />

– 36 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!