Film theft in the UK - Future of Copyright
Film theft in the UK - Future of Copyright
Film theft in the UK - Future of Copyright
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
52<br />
judge would <strong>the</strong>n be able to award an<br />
appropriate amount with<strong>in</strong> a set range. Such<br />
damages are available <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries such<br />
as <strong>the</strong> US, Canada and Israel, and constitute an<br />
effective remedy <strong>in</strong> an area where it is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
impossible to assess <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g<br />
activity. The crim<strong>in</strong>al nature <strong>of</strong> piracy usually<br />
means that records show<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong><br />
pirate sales do not exist, or any that do exist are<br />
unreliable.<br />
(See Chapter 5, sub-head<strong>in</strong>g: ‘<strong>Copyright</strong><br />
protection <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>’.)<br />
3 Introduce a comprehensive package <strong>of</strong><br />
legislative reforms designed to curb <strong>the</strong> sale <strong>of</strong><br />
pirate products at street markets, car boot sales<br />
and via o<strong>the</strong>r forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formal trad<strong>in</strong>g 62<br />
These reforms would <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
• Enactment <strong>of</strong> amendment s107A <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Copyright</strong>, Designs and Patents Act 1988<br />
(CDPA) so that trad<strong>in</strong>g standards pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />
have <strong>the</strong> power to enforce copyright law,<br />
br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sector <strong>in</strong>to l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>the</strong> law <strong>of</strong><br />
trademarks;<br />
• Introduction <strong>of</strong> an improved registration<br />
scheme that would require owners and<br />
organisers <strong>of</strong> occasional sales to notify <strong>the</strong> local<br />
Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards authority 21 days <strong>in</strong> advance<br />
as well as place an obligation on <strong>the</strong> organiser<br />
to ga<strong>the</strong>r names, address and vehicle licence<br />
details <strong>of</strong> all dealers at <strong>the</strong> sale. The scheme<br />
should also oblige organisers to also note <strong>the</strong><br />
type <strong>of</strong> goods be<strong>in</strong>g sold (eg anyone sell<strong>in</strong>g<br />
new DVDs is go<strong>in</strong>g to be <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest);<br />
• Introduction <strong>of</strong> new powers to allow Trad<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Standards Officers to close down occasional<br />
sales that persistently <strong>in</strong>clude trad<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />
counterfeit goods. This could be done via an<br />
enforcement order under <strong>the</strong> Enterprise Act<br />
(formerly “stop now” orders). It would require<br />
<strong>the</strong> recipient <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> order (<strong>the</strong> sale organiser) to<br />
comply with <strong>the</strong> local authority order to cease<br />
allow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> illegal practice. In default an<br />
<strong>in</strong>junction can be sought. Alternatively an<br />
<strong>of</strong>fence could be created for failure to comply<br />
with <strong>the</strong> notice;<br />
• Introduction <strong>of</strong> a requirement for <strong>the</strong> person<br />
giv<strong>in</strong>g registration details to <strong>the</strong> authorities on<br />
behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trader to be over 18 years. This is<br />
<strong>in</strong>tended to clamp down on <strong>the</strong> habit <strong>of</strong><br />
traders us<strong>in</strong>g under-age children as a front for<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir illegal activity <strong>in</strong> order to avoid liability.<br />
While it will not be able to stop this entirely, it<br />
will ensure that an adult has to be present<br />
when registration is tak<strong>in</strong>g place and will<br />
rema<strong>in</strong> with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> prec<strong>in</strong>ct <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> market;<br />
• Amendment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Proceeds <strong>of</strong> Crime Act to<br />
enable trad<strong>in</strong>g standards to recover <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong><br />
prosecution <strong>of</strong> IP <strong>of</strong>fences. This would help<br />
address <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> local authorities not<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g sufficient funds to allocate to<br />
prosecution <strong>of</strong> IP crime and ensure that serious<br />
IP <strong>of</strong>fences could be pursued <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> courts; and<br />
• Make it a legal obligation for Trad<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Standards to submit <strong>in</strong>formation on<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigations and prosecutions be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
undertaken for IP <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement to <strong>the</strong> Patents<br />
Office. This would require amendment to <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Copyright</strong> Designs and Patents Act (<strong>in</strong> tandem<br />
with implementation <strong>of</strong> s107A) and to <strong>the</strong><br />
Trade Marks Act 1994, and possibly to TDA as<br />
well to allow disclosure to <strong>the</strong> Patents Office<br />
and to <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>vestigations.<br />
(See Chapter 5, sub-head<strong>in</strong>g ‘Enforcement at a<br />
local level’.)<br />
4 Introduce legislation to make <strong>the</strong> act <strong>of</strong><br />
camcord<strong>in</strong>g a film <strong>in</strong> a c<strong>in</strong>ema a crim<strong>in</strong>al<br />
<strong>of</strong>fence. It is implausible that someone<br />
camcord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a c<strong>in</strong>ema would be do<strong>in</strong>g so for<br />
any o<strong>the</strong>r reason than f<strong>in</strong>ancial ga<strong>in</strong>. This is<br />
already be<strong>in</strong>g done <strong>in</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> US states.<br />
(See Chapter 5, sub-head<strong>in</strong>g ‘<strong>Copyright</strong><br />
protection <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>’.)<br />
5 Through <strong>the</strong> Creative Industries IP Forum,<br />
and work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> conjunction with Ofcom and<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r appropriate organisations, promote <strong>the</strong><br />
development and spread <strong>of</strong> open crossplatform<br />
global standards related to Digital<br />
Rights Management (DRM), ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>