Smart Infrared Inspection System Field Operational Test - Center for ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

[This page intentionally left blank.] 22
6. FUTURE DIRECTION Based on the data collected over the past two years at the Greene County IS and the findings of this report, ORNL believes that no additional evaluation is required of the SIRIS system algorithm at this time. As a screening tool, a user can be relatively assured that a vehicle flagged by SIRIS will have a verifiable defect with minimal false positives expected. It is understood that certain aspects of the system need improvement. It is desirous that the overall system be more stable during weather events and power fluctuations. The next step for creating a nationally-deployable infrared screening tool similar to SIRIS is to create functional and performance specifications that can be used by a state interested in deploying this type of equipment. The specification should be based on the performance and capabilities of SIRIS and should require a more rugged system than the current prototype. It is suggested that all first-order testing, validation and certification of future infrared inspection systems be done at the Greene County IS to allow the testing and performance measurement of these systems to be done in the same operational and vehicle stream environment (I-81 southbound) as the SIRIS proof-of-concept, pilot test, and FOT. 23
Page 1 and 2: ORNL/TM-2011/98 Smart Infrared Insp
Page 3 and 4: Energy and Transportation Science D
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS, AC
Page 7 and 8: LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Driver's
Page 9 and 10: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Smart InfraRe
Page 11 and 12: 1. INTRODUCTION In 2006, Internatio
Page 13 and 14: Type of Flaw Detected Brakes 274 Ti
Page 15 and 16: 2. FIELD OPERATIONAL TEST The FOT w
Page 17 and 18: Figure 1. Driver's side components
Page 19 and 20: 2.2.2 Performance-Based Brake Teste
Page 21 and 22: 3. ANALYSIS OF FOT DATA The main go
Page 23 and 24: Type of Flaw Detected Table 5. Deta
Page 25 and 26: Percentage of Sampled Vehicles Perc
Page 27 and 28: 3.3.3 Bearing Violations Shown in T
Page 29 and 30: 4.1 SIRIS FUNCTIONALITY ISSUES 4. L
Page 31: 5. CONCLUSIONS The SIRIS device dev
Page 35 and 36: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The CMVRTC team wo
Page 37 and 38: APPENDIX A: MAINLINE BRAKE ASSESSME
Page 39 and 40: APPENDIX B: VIOLATIONS ASSOCIATED W
Page 41 and 42: APPENDIX C: SIRIS PROBLEM LOG SHEET
Page 43 and 44: APPENDIX D: SIRIS FIELD OPERATIONAL
Page 45 and 46: APPENDIX E: TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATRO
Page 47 and 48: APPENDIX F: SIRIS OPERATIONS MANUAL
Page 49 and 50: InfraRed Camera Optical Trigger Veh
Page 51 and 52: REGIONS OF INTEREST SIRIS measures
Page 53 and 54: If the ROI is too skewed, it will c
Page 55 and 56: STOP COLLECTING In order to stop co
Page 57 and 58: MODULE STATUS Module status lists t
Page 59 and 60: CONNECT This button allows the oper
Page 61 and 62: DISPLAY vehicle entries in the coll
Page 63 and 64: AUTO SCALE Auto Scale adjusts the c
Page 65 and 66: ALERTING SYSTEM When the SIRIS syst
Page 67 and 68: TIRE ALERTS As a vehicle passes thr
Page 69 and 70: It is recommended that vehicles wit
Page 71 and 72: BEARING ALERTS Bearing alerts are i

Smart Infrared Inspection System Field Operational Test - Center for ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?