10.08.2013 Views

ehr onc final certification - Department of Health Care Services

ehr onc final certification - Department of Health Care Services

ehr onc final certification - Department of Health Care Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Record smoking<br />

status for patients<br />

13 years old or<br />

older<br />

More than 50% <strong>of</strong> all<br />

unique patients 13 years<br />

old or older seen by the<br />

EP or admitted to the<br />

eligible hospital’s or<br />

CAH’s inpatient or<br />

emergency department<br />

(POS 21 or 23) have<br />

smoking status recorded<br />

as structured data<br />

Interim Final Rule Text:<br />

Smoking status. Enable a user to electronically record,<br />

modify, and retrieve the smoking status <strong>of</strong> a patient.<br />

Smoking status types must include: current smoker,<br />

former smoker, or never smoked.<br />

Final Rule Text:<br />

§170.302(g)<br />

Smoking status. Enable a user to electronically record,<br />

modify, and retrieve the smoking status <strong>of</strong> a patient.<br />

Smoking status types must include: current every day<br />

smoker; current some day smoker; former smoker;<br />

never smoker; smoker, current status unknown; and<br />

unknown if ever smoked.<br />

Comments. Several commenters stated that the smoking status <strong>certification</strong><br />

criterion was overly prescriptive because it specified certain status variables. These<br />

commenters agreed that recording smoking status is crucial to health improvement<br />

efforts, but contended that mandating certain fields was the wrong approach. Many <strong>of</strong><br />

these commenters stated that they were unaware <strong>of</strong> defined industry standard value set<br />

for smoking terminology and other suggested that our reference to specific types <strong>of</strong><br />

smokers be removed. Others asked whether these variables were examples or the only<br />

responses allowed. A few commenters agreed with this <strong>certification</strong> criterion as<br />

reasonable and appropriate because it would provide value for both clinical care and<br />

public health. Commenters recommended that besides what we had specified, the<br />

<strong>certification</strong> criterion should also reference packs per day history information,<br />

secondhand smoke exposure, and alcohol consumption information. Other commenters<br />

recommended that the <strong>certification</strong> criterion be changed to reflect tobacco use rather than<br />

smoking.<br />

Response. We have adopted this <strong>certification</strong> criterion to fully support the <strong>final</strong><br />

meaningful use objective and measure, which in response to comments has been revised<br />

to further clarify the purpose <strong>of</strong> the objective and measure. We therefore disagree with<br />

those commenters who stated that this <strong>certification</strong> criterion is too prescriptive.<br />

Page 65 <strong>of</strong> 228

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!