ehr onc final certification - Department of Health Care Services
ehr onc final certification - Department of Health Care Services
ehr onc final certification - Department of Health Care Services
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
the c<strong>onc</strong>erns expressed by some commenters that the developers <strong>of</strong> some practice<br />
management systems may not be prepared to seek <strong>certification</strong> for these legacy systems<br />
in 2010 or 2011. We also acknowledge that the required compliance date <strong>of</strong> January 1,<br />
2012 for ASC X12N version 5010 transactions would further complicate the <strong>certification</strong><br />
process associated with meaningful use Stage 1. However, we believe that after the ASC<br />
X12N version 5010 transition has occurred, and we approach the October 1, 2013<br />
compliance date for HIPAA covered entities to use ICD-10, our decision to delay the<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> administrative transactions <strong>certification</strong> criteria will prove beneficial for the<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> Certified EHR Technology.<br />
In order to meet upcoming administrative simplification deadlines, most health<br />
care providers will have to upgrade their practice management systems or implement new<br />
ones. This will provide an important opportunity to align EHR technology capabilities<br />
and standards for administrative transactions with the administrative simplification<br />
provisions that the Affordable <strong>Care</strong> Act provides for health plans and clearinghouses.<br />
Therefore, we intend to include for adoption, administrative transactions standards and<br />
<strong>certification</strong> criteria to support meaningful use Stage 2 rulemaking, and expect health<br />
care providers and Complete EHR and EHR Module developers to take this into<br />
consideration leading up to 2013.<br />
Comments. Many commenters recommended that we remove the implementation<br />
specification, CORE Phase 1 (CORE), which we previously adopted. Several<br />
commenters noted that CORE is only useful if it has also been adopted by health plans,<br />
and they explained that not all health plans had adopted CORE. A few commenters<br />
expressed c<strong>onc</strong>ern with CORE stating that it adds requirements to the HIPAA Standard<br />
Page 87 <strong>of</strong> 228