10.08.2013 Views

ehr onc final certification - Department of Health Care Services

ehr onc final certification - Department of Health Care Services

ehr onc final certification - Department of Health Care Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the c<strong>onc</strong>erns expressed by some commenters that the developers <strong>of</strong> some practice<br />

management systems may not be prepared to seek <strong>certification</strong> for these legacy systems<br />

in 2010 or 2011. We also acknowledge that the required compliance date <strong>of</strong> January 1,<br />

2012 for ASC X12N version 5010 transactions would further complicate the <strong>certification</strong><br />

process associated with meaningful use Stage 1. However, we believe that after the ASC<br />

X12N version 5010 transition has occurred, and we approach the October 1, 2013<br />

compliance date for HIPAA covered entities to use ICD-10, our decision to delay the<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> administrative transactions <strong>certification</strong> criteria will prove beneficial for the<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> Certified EHR Technology.<br />

In order to meet upcoming administrative simplification deadlines, most health<br />

care providers will have to upgrade their practice management systems or implement new<br />

ones. This will provide an important opportunity to align EHR technology capabilities<br />

and standards for administrative transactions with the administrative simplification<br />

provisions that the Affordable <strong>Care</strong> Act provides for health plans and clearinghouses.<br />

Therefore, we intend to include for adoption, administrative transactions standards and<br />

<strong>certification</strong> criteria to support meaningful use Stage 2 rulemaking, and expect health<br />

care providers and Complete EHR and EHR Module developers to take this into<br />

consideration leading up to 2013.<br />

Comments. Many commenters recommended that we remove the implementation<br />

specification, CORE Phase 1 (CORE), which we previously adopted. Several<br />

commenters noted that CORE is only useful if it has also been adopted by health plans,<br />

and they explained that not all health plans had adopted CORE. A few commenters<br />

expressed c<strong>onc</strong>ern with CORE stating that it adds requirements to the HIPAA Standard<br />

Page 87 <strong>of</strong> 228

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!