Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
absurdities and deficiencies. This was true in a far less degree of<br />
Terence, who dealt in plots more stataria and less motoria. 81<br />
Though using the same store of models, he endeavored to produce<br />
an artistically constructed play, which should make some honest<br />
effort to "hold the mirror up to nature." We are convinced that<br />
even his extensive use of contaminatio was designed to evolve a<br />
better plot. The extravagance of Plautus is toned down in<br />
Terence to a reasonable verisimilitude and a far more "gentlemanly"<br />
mode of fun-making that was appropriate to one in the<br />
confidence of the aristocratic Scipionic circle. But when all is said<br />
and done, Terence lacks the vivid primeval "Volkswitz" of Plautus.<br />
We dare only skirt the edges of this extensive subject.82<br />
Above all, our noble jester succeeds in his mission of laughproducing.<br />
But his methods are not possessed in the main of<br />
dramatic respectability. And it must be apparent that our analysis<br />
and citations have covered the bulk of the plays.<br />
We conclude then that the prevalence of inherent defects of composition<br />
and the lack of serious motive, coupled with the author's<br />
constant and conscious employment of the implements of broad<br />
farce and extravagant burlesque, impel us inevitably to the conclusion<br />
that we have before us a species of composition which,<br />
while following a dramatic form, is not inherently drama, but a<br />
variety of entertainment that may be described as a compound of<br />
comedy, farce and burlesque ; while the accompanying music,<br />
which would lend dignity to tragedy or grand opera, merely<br />
heightens the humorous effect and lends the color of musical comedy<br />
or opera bouffe. 83 K6rting is right in calling it mere entertainment,<br />
Mommsen is right in calling it caricature, but we maintain<br />
that it is professedly mere entertainment, that it is consciously<br />
caricature and if it fulfills thse functions we have no right to<br />
criticise it on other grounds. If . we attempt a serious critique of<br />
it as drama, we have at once on our hands a capricious mass of<br />
dramatic unrealities and absurdities : bombast, burlesque, extravagance,<br />
horse-play, soliloquies, asides, direct address of the<br />
81Euanthius, de Com. IV. 4.<br />
82For an interesting comparison of Plautus and Terence, v. Spengel, Uber<br />
die lateinische Komodie, (Munich 1878).<br />
83The importance of the music is indicated by the transmission of the<br />
composer's name in all extant didascaliae, esp. those of Terence. V. Klotz,'<br />
Altrom; Met. p. 384 ff.<br />
68