shot noise in mesoscopic conductors - Low Temperature Laboratory
shot noise in mesoscopic conductors - Low Temperature Laboratory
shot noise in mesoscopic conductors - Low Temperature Laboratory
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Ya.M. Blanter, M. Bu( ttiker / Physics Reports 336 (2000) 1}166 37<br />
energies E . In many situations, however, the Lorentz tails of ¹(E) far from the resonances are<br />
<br />
not important, and one can write<br />
/4 ¹(E)" ¹ <br />
(E!E )#/4 <br />
.<br />
Despite the fact that the transparencies of both barriers are low, we see that the total transmission<br />
coe$cient shows sharp peaks around resonant energies. This e!ect is a consequence of constructive<br />
<strong>in</strong>terference and is known as resonant tunnel<strong>in</strong>g. The transmission coe$cient at the top of a peak<br />
equals ¹;<br />
for a symmetric resonance " the transmission is ideal, ¹"1.<br />
This<br />
<br />
<br />
dependence may be probed by apply<strong>in</strong>g a gate voltage. The gate voltage moves the positions of<br />
the resonant levels, and the conductance exhibits peaks around each resonance.<br />
In the l<strong>in</strong>ear regime the <strong>shot</strong> <strong>noise</strong> is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the transmission coe$cient evaluated at the<br />
Fermi level, and is thus an oscillat<strong>in</strong>g function of the gate voltage, vanish<strong>in</strong>g almost completely<br />
between the peaks. The Fano factor (60) at the top of each peak is equal to F"( ! )/. <br />
It vanishes for a symmetric barrier. For a resonance with ¹'1/2<br />
the Fano factor reaches<br />
<br />
a maximum each time when the transmission probability passes through ¹"1/2; for a resonance<br />
with ¹(1/2<br />
the <strong>shot</strong> <strong>noise</strong> is maximal at resonance.<br />
<br />
One-dimensional problem, non-l<strong>in</strong>ear regime. For arbitrary voltage, direct evaluation of the expressions<br />
(39) and (61) gives an average current,<br />
I" e <br />
, (76)<br />
<br />
<br />
and a zero-temperature <strong>shot</strong> <strong>noise</strong>,<br />
S" 2e ( # )<br />
. (77)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Here N is the number of resonant levels <strong>in</strong> the energy strip e< between the chemical potentials of<br />
<br />
the left and right reservoirs. Eqs. (76) and (77) are only valid when this number is well de"ned } the<br />
energy di!erence between any resonant level and the chemical potential of any reservoir must be<br />
much greater than . Under this condition both the current and the <strong>shot</strong> <strong>noise</strong> are <strong>in</strong>dependent of<br />
the applied voltage. The dependence of both the current and the <strong>shot</strong> <strong>noise</strong> on the bias voltage < is<br />
thus a set of plateaus, the height of each plateau be<strong>in</strong>g proportional to the number of resonant<br />
levels through which transmission is possible. Outside this regime, when one of the resonant levels<br />
is close to the chemical potential of left and/or right reservoir, a smooth transition with a width of<br />
order from one plateau to the next occurs.<br />
Consider now for a moment, a structure with a s<strong>in</strong>gle resonance. If the applied voltage is large<br />
enough, such that the resonance is between the Fermi level of the source contact and that of the<br />
s<strong>in</strong>k contact, the Fano factor is<br />
F"(# )/ . (78)<br />
<br />
We assume that the resonances are well separated, ;/2mw.<br />
For discussion of experimental realizations, see below.