15.08.2013 Views

shot noise in mesoscopic conductors - Low Temperature Laboratory

shot noise in mesoscopic conductors - Low Temperature Laboratory

shot noise in mesoscopic conductors - Low Temperature Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ya.M. Blanter, M. Bu( ttiker / Physics Reports 336 (2000) 1}166 37<br />

energies E . In many situations, however, the Lorentz tails of ¹(E) far from the resonances are<br />

<br />

not important, and one can write<br />

/4 ¹(E)" ¹ <br />

(E!E )#/4 <br />

.<br />

Despite the fact that the transparencies of both barriers are low, we see that the total transmission<br />

coe$cient shows sharp peaks around resonant energies. This e!ect is a consequence of constructive<br />

<strong>in</strong>terference and is known as resonant tunnel<strong>in</strong>g. The transmission coe$cient at the top of a peak<br />

equals ¹;<br />

for a symmetric resonance " the transmission is ideal, ¹"1.<br />

This<br />

<br />

<br />

dependence may be probed by apply<strong>in</strong>g a gate voltage. The gate voltage moves the positions of<br />

the resonant levels, and the conductance exhibits peaks around each resonance.<br />

In the l<strong>in</strong>ear regime the <strong>shot</strong> <strong>noise</strong> is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the transmission coe$cient evaluated at the<br />

Fermi level, and is thus an oscillat<strong>in</strong>g function of the gate voltage, vanish<strong>in</strong>g almost completely<br />

between the peaks. The Fano factor (60) at the top of each peak is equal to F"( ! )/. <br />

It vanishes for a symmetric barrier. For a resonance with ¹'1/2<br />

the Fano factor reaches<br />

<br />

a maximum each time when the transmission probability passes through ¹"1/2; for a resonance<br />

with ¹(1/2<br />

the <strong>shot</strong> <strong>noise</strong> is maximal at resonance.<br />

<br />

One-dimensional problem, non-l<strong>in</strong>ear regime. For arbitrary voltage, direct evaluation of the expressions<br />

(39) and (61) gives an average current,<br />

I" e <br />

, (76)<br />

<br />

<br />

and a zero-temperature <strong>shot</strong> <strong>noise</strong>,<br />

S" 2e ( # )<br />

. (77)<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Here N is the number of resonant levels <strong>in</strong> the energy strip e< between the chemical potentials of<br />

<br />

the left and right reservoirs. Eqs. (76) and (77) are only valid when this number is well de"ned } the<br />

energy di!erence between any resonant level and the chemical potential of any reservoir must be<br />

much greater than . Under this condition both the current and the <strong>shot</strong> <strong>noise</strong> are <strong>in</strong>dependent of<br />

the applied voltage. The dependence of both the current and the <strong>shot</strong> <strong>noise</strong> on the bias voltage < is<br />

thus a set of plateaus, the height of each plateau be<strong>in</strong>g proportional to the number of resonant<br />

levels through which transmission is possible. Outside this regime, when one of the resonant levels<br />

is close to the chemical potential of left and/or right reservoir, a smooth transition with a width of<br />

order from one plateau to the next occurs.<br />

Consider now for a moment, a structure with a s<strong>in</strong>gle resonance. If the applied voltage is large<br />

enough, such that the resonance is between the Fermi level of the source contact and that of the<br />

s<strong>in</strong>k contact, the Fano factor is<br />

F"(# )/ . (78)<br />

<br />

We assume that the resonances are well separated, ;/2mw.<br />

For discussion of experimental realizations, see below.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!