Aggravated, Exemplary and Restitutionary ... - Law Commission
Aggravated, Exemplary and Restitutionary ... - Law Commission
Aggravated, Exemplary and Restitutionary ... - Law Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2. OUR CONSULTATION EXERCISES<br />
(1) Consultation Paper No 132<br />
(a) The main arguments considered in the Consultation Paper<br />
1.5 The following arguments, for <strong>and</strong> against exemplary damages, were considered in<br />
Consultation Paper No 132: 554<br />
(i) Against exemplary damages<br />
• the aim of the law of civil wrongs is to provide compensation for loss;<br />
• punishment is not a legitimate function of the law of civil wrongs <strong>and</strong><br />
should take place only within the context of the criminal law;<br />
• now that non-pecuniary harm is more freely compensatable exemplary<br />
damages are no longer necessary;<br />
• the quantum of exemplary damages is uncertain <strong>and</strong> indeterminate;<br />
• exemplary damages constitute an undeserved windfall to the plaintiff;<br />
• levels of exemplary damages are too high.<br />
(ii) In favour of exemplary damages<br />
• punishment, deterrence <strong>and</strong> the marking out of conduct for disapproval are<br />
legitimate functions of the law of civil wrongs;<br />
• exemplary damages alert plaintiffs to a method for the effective private<br />
enforcement of important rights;<br />
• criminal, regulatory <strong>and</strong> administrative sanctions are inadequate;<br />
• in some situations, compensation is inadequate or artificial, or does not<br />
effectively remedy the infringement of certain important interests.<br />
1.6 Our provisional view was that exemplary damages should be retained, but put on a<br />
principled basis. 555<br />
This was supported by the majority of consultees, although a<br />
wide variety of different views were expressed.<br />
(b) Some of the main arguments put forward by consultees<br />
(i) Against exemplary damages<br />
1.7 The main arguments against exemplary damages focused on two issues: the divide<br />
between the criminal <strong>and</strong> civil law <strong>and</strong> the appropriateness of other remedies.<br />
554 <strong>Aggravated</strong>, <strong>Exemplary</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Restitutionary</strong> Damages (1993) Consultation Paper No 132,<br />
paras 5.4-5.38.<br />
94