17.08.2013 Views

student research day - Case Western Reserve University School of ...

student research day - Case Western Reserve University School of ...

student research day - Case Western Reserve University School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Jason Balkman<br />

Dual Energy Subtraction Digital Radiography Improves Performance <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Commerical Computer-aided Detection Program<br />

Jason Balkman and Robert C. Gilkeson<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, <strong>University</strong> Hospitals<br />

Skeletal structures are a significant source <strong>of</strong> anatomic noise on a chest radiograph, making them a major limiting<br />

factor for the detection <strong>of</strong> subtle lung nodules for both physicians and computer-aided detection (CAD) programs. Dual<br />

energy subtraction (DES) enables the acquisition <strong>of</strong> a s<strong>of</strong>t tissue only chest radiograph and has shown potential to<br />

improve physician performance in the detection <strong>of</strong> subtle cancers. Few studies have used DES to examine its effect on<br />

CAD performance, which is <strong>of</strong>ten poor because <strong>of</strong> difficulties distinguishing bony structures. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study<br />

was to apply a commercial CAD program to the analysis <strong>of</strong> both standard posteroanterior (PA) and DES chest<br />

radiography, and compare the sensitivity and number <strong>of</strong> false-positive marks achieved by the CAD system in both<br />

cases.<br />

One hundred and two patient records were retrospectively identified as having DES radiographs and pulmonary<br />

nodules confirmed by CT. Those patients with biopsy proven lung carcinoma (n=45) were selected and the panel was<br />

narrowed to identify patients with lung nodules 8-30 mm in size (n = 36) to satisfy the search criteria for the CAD<br />

system. The final panel <strong>of</strong> 36 patients with a total <strong>of</strong> 48 nodules was evaluated.<br />

The sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the CAD program with the standard PA was 46% (22 <strong>of</strong> 48 nodules) compared to 67% (32 <strong>of</strong> 48<br />

nodules) using the DES s<strong>of</strong>t tissue, or bone-subtracted view (P=0.064). The average number <strong>of</strong> false positives per<br />

image (FPPI) identified by CAD was significantly lower using DES (FPPI ST=1.64) when compared to the standard PA<br />

chest radiograph (FPPI PA=2.39) (P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!