Download - NASA
Download - NASA
Download - NASA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
88 Rotor<br />
fg =<br />
⎧<br />
<br />
1 −<br />
1<br />
(4zg/R) 2<br />
3/2 <br />
1+1.5<br />
⎪⎨<br />
⎪⎩<br />
σaλi 1<br />
4CT (4zg/R) 2<br />
−3/2 <br />
3/2 1.0991 − 0.1042/(zg/D)<br />
1+(CT /σ)(0.2894 − 0.3913/(zg/D))<br />
<br />
0.9926 + 0.03794<br />
(zg/2R) 2<br />
−1 <br />
0.0544<br />
0.9122 +<br />
(zg/R) −3/2 CT /σ<br />
Cheeseman and Bennett<br />
Cheeseman and Bennett (BE)<br />
Law<br />
Hayden<br />
Zbrozek<br />
These equations break down at small height above the ground, and so are restricted to zg/D ≥ 0.15;<br />
however, the database for ground effect extends only to about z/D =0.3. Also, fg ≤ 1 is required.<br />
Figure 11-2 shows T/T∞ = κg = f −2/3<br />
g as a function of z/R for these models (CT /σ =0.05, 0.10, 0.15),<br />
compared with test data from several sources.<br />
11-4.1.3 Inflow Gradient<br />
As a simple approximation to nonuniform induced velocity distribution, a linear variation over the<br />
disk is used: Δλ = λxr cos ψ + λyr sin ψ. There are contributions to Δλ from forward flight and from<br />
hub moments, which influence the relationship between flapping and cyclic. The linear inflow variation<br />
caused by forward flight is Δλf = λi(κxr cos ψ + κyr sin ψ), where λi is the mean inflow. Typically κx<br />
is positive, and roughly 1 at high speed; and κy is smaller in magnitude and negative. Both κx and κy<br />
must be zero in hover. Based on references 5–8, the following models are considered:<br />
15π<br />
15π<br />
Coleman and Feingold: κx0 = fx tan χ/2 =fx<br />
32 32<br />
κy0 = −fy2μ<br />
√ √<br />
White and Blake: κx0 = fx 2 sin χ = fx 2<br />
κy0 = −2fyμ<br />
μ<br />
μ 2 + λ 2 + |λ|<br />
μ<br />
μ 2 + λ 2<br />
where tan χ = |λ|/μ is the wake angle. Extending these results to include sideward velocity gives<br />
κx =(κx0μx + κy0μy)/μ and κy =(−κx0μy + κy0μx)/μ. Forflexibility, the empirical factors fx and fy<br />
have been introduced (values of 1.0 give the baseline model). There is also an inflow variation produced<br />
by any net aerodynamic moment on the rotor disk, which can be evaluated using a differential form of<br />
momentum theory:<br />
Δλm =<br />
fm<br />
μ 2 + λ 2 (−2CMyr cos ψ +2CMxr sin ψ) =λxmr cos ψ + λymr sin ψ<br />
including empirical factor fm. Note that the denominator of the hub-moment term is zero for a hovering<br />
rotor at zero thrust; so this inflow contribution should not be used for cases of low speed and low thrust.