Download - NASA
Download - NASA
Download - NASA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
90 Rotor<br />
The forces acting on the hub are the thrust T , drag H, and side force Y (positive in z, x, yaxis<br />
directions, respectively). The aerodynamic analysis is conducted for a clockwise rotating rotor,<br />
with appropriate sign changes for lateral velocity, flapping, and force. The analysis is conducted in<br />
dimensionless form, based on the actual radius and rotational speed of the flight state. The inplane hub<br />
forces are produced by tilt of the thrust vector with the tip-path plane, plus forces in the tip-path plane,<br />
and profile terms (produced by the blade drag coefficient). The orientation of the tip-path axes relative<br />
to the shaft axes is then C PS = Xrβs Y−βc. Then<br />
⎛<br />
⎝ CH<br />
CY<br />
CT<br />
⎞<br />
⎠ = C SP<br />
⎛<br />
⎝<br />
0<br />
0<br />
CT /C SP<br />
33<br />
⎞ ⎛<br />
⎠ + rCY tpp<br />
0<br />
⎝ CHtpp<br />
⎞ ⎛<br />
⎠ +<br />
⎝ CHo<br />
rCYo<br />
0<br />
The inplane forces relative to the tip-path plane can be neglected, or calculated by blade-element theory.<br />
Note that with tip-path plane command and CHtpp and CY tpp neglected, it is not necessary to solve for<br />
the rotor collective and cyclic pitch angles. In general the inplane forces relative to the tip-path plane<br />
are not zero, and may be significant, as for a rotor with large flap stiffness. Figures 11-3a and b show<br />
respectively the tip-path plane tilt and thrust vector tilt with cyclic pitch control (no-feathering plane tilt)<br />
as functions of flap stiffness (frequency), for several rotor thrust values. The difference between tip-path<br />
plane tilt (fig. 11-3a) and thrust vector tilt (fig. 11-3b) is caused by tilt of the thrust vector relative to the<br />
tip-path plane.<br />
The profile inplane forces can be obtained from simplified equations, or calculated by blade-element<br />
theory. The simplified method uses:<br />
CHo<br />
CYo<br />
<br />
= σ<br />
8 cdmeanFH<br />
<br />
μx/μ<br />
−μy/μ<br />
where the mean drag coefficient cdmean is from the profile power calculation. The function FH accounts<br />
for the increase of the blade-section velocity with rotor edgewise and axial speed: CHo =<br />
1<br />
2 σcdU(r sin ψ + μ)dr = 1<br />
2 σcd(u 2 T + u2 R + u2 P )1/2 (r sin ψ + μ)dr; so (from Harris)<br />
with V 2 = μ 2 + μ 2 z.<br />
FH =4 1<br />
2π<br />
2π 1<br />
0<br />
<br />
∼= 1+V 2<br />
0<br />
⎞<br />
⎠<br />
2 2 2 1/2<br />
(r + μ sin ψ) +(μcos ψ) + μz (r sin ψ + μ) dr dψ<br />
<br />
3μ + 1<br />
4 μ3 V 2 − 1<br />
(1 + V 2 ) 2<br />
<br />
+ μμ 2 z + 3<br />
4 μ3<br />
<br />
ln<br />
11-4.3 Blade-Element Theory<br />
√ <br />
1+V 2 +1<br />
Blade-element theory is the basis for the solution for the collective and cyclic pitch angles (or flap<br />
angles) and evaluation of the rotor inplane hub forces. The section aerodynamics are described by lift<br />
varying linearly with angle-of-attack, cℓ = cℓαα (no stall), and a constant mean drag coefficient cdmean<br />
(from the profile power calculation). The analysis is conducted in dimensionless form (based on density<br />
ρ, rotor rotational speed Ω, and blade radius R of the flight state). So in the following σ, ν, and γ are<br />
for the actual R and Ω, and a =5.7 is the lift-curve slope used in the Lock number γ. The blade-section<br />
aerodynamic environment is described by the three components of velocity, from which the yaw and<br />
V