18.08.2013 Views

Download - NASA

Download - NASA

Download - NASA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

90 Rotor<br />

The forces acting on the hub are the thrust T , drag H, and side force Y (positive in z, x, yaxis<br />

directions, respectively). The aerodynamic analysis is conducted for a clockwise rotating rotor,<br />

with appropriate sign changes for lateral velocity, flapping, and force. The analysis is conducted in<br />

dimensionless form, based on the actual radius and rotational speed of the flight state. The inplane hub<br />

forces are produced by tilt of the thrust vector with the tip-path plane, plus forces in the tip-path plane,<br />

and profile terms (produced by the blade drag coefficient). The orientation of the tip-path axes relative<br />

to the shaft axes is then C PS = Xrβs Y−βc. Then<br />

⎛<br />

⎝ CH<br />

CY<br />

CT<br />

⎞<br />

⎠ = C SP<br />

⎛<br />

⎝<br />

0<br />

0<br />

CT /C SP<br />

33<br />

⎞ ⎛<br />

⎠ + rCY tpp<br />

0<br />

⎝ CHtpp<br />

⎞ ⎛<br />

⎠ +<br />

⎝ CHo<br />

rCYo<br />

0<br />

The inplane forces relative to the tip-path plane can be neglected, or calculated by blade-element theory.<br />

Note that with tip-path plane command and CHtpp and CY tpp neglected, it is not necessary to solve for<br />

the rotor collective and cyclic pitch angles. In general the inplane forces relative to the tip-path plane<br />

are not zero, and may be significant, as for a rotor with large flap stiffness. Figures 11-3a and b show<br />

respectively the tip-path plane tilt and thrust vector tilt with cyclic pitch control (no-feathering plane tilt)<br />

as functions of flap stiffness (frequency), for several rotor thrust values. The difference between tip-path<br />

plane tilt (fig. 11-3a) and thrust vector tilt (fig. 11-3b) is caused by tilt of the thrust vector relative to the<br />

tip-path plane.<br />

The profile inplane forces can be obtained from simplified equations, or calculated by blade-element<br />

theory. The simplified method uses:<br />

CHo<br />

CYo<br />

<br />

= σ<br />

8 cdmeanFH<br />

<br />

μx/μ<br />

−μy/μ<br />

where the mean drag coefficient cdmean is from the profile power calculation. The function FH accounts<br />

for the increase of the blade-section velocity with rotor edgewise and axial speed: CHo =<br />

1<br />

2 σcdU(r sin ψ + μ)dr = 1<br />

2 σcd(u 2 T + u2 R + u2 P )1/2 (r sin ψ + μ)dr; so (from Harris)<br />

with V 2 = μ 2 + μ 2 z.<br />

FH =4 1<br />

2π<br />

2π 1<br />

0<br />

<br />

∼= 1+V 2<br />

0<br />

⎞<br />

⎠<br />

2 2 2 1/2<br />

(r + μ sin ψ) +(μcos ψ) + μz (r sin ψ + μ) dr dψ<br />

<br />

3μ + 1<br />

4 μ3 V 2 − 1<br />

(1 + V 2 ) 2<br />

<br />

+ μμ 2 z + 3<br />

4 μ3<br />

<br />

ln<br />

11-4.3 Blade-Element Theory<br />

√ <br />

1+V 2 +1<br />

Blade-element theory is the basis for the solution for the collective and cyclic pitch angles (or flap<br />

angles) and evaluation of the rotor inplane hub forces. The section aerodynamics are described by lift<br />

varying linearly with angle-of-attack, cℓ = cℓαα (no stall), and a constant mean drag coefficient cdmean<br />

(from the profile power calculation). The analysis is conducted in dimensionless form (based on density<br />

ρ, rotor rotational speed Ω, and blade radius R of the flight state). So in the following σ, ν, and γ are<br />

for the actual R and Ω, and a =5.7 is the lift-curve slope used in the Lock number γ. The blade-section<br />

aerodynamic environment is described by the three components of velocity, from which the yaw and<br />

V

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!