Download - NASA
Download - NASA
Download - NASA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
104 Rotor<br />
vm = κ(KT / √ 2) (T1 + T2)/2ρA. The interference velocities are calculated separately for the two<br />
rotors, with the correction factor ft: vint1 = ftκ T1/2ρA and vint2 = ftκ T2/2ρA. The sum vint1 + vint2<br />
must take the required value. Below the non-overlap region, the component is in the wake of only one<br />
of the rotors, so the interference velocity from the other rotor is zero, and thus ft =1. Below the overlap<br />
region, the component is in the wake of both rotors, and the sum of the interference velocities equals vm<br />
if<br />
fth = KT / √ 2<br />
√ τ1 + √ τ2<br />
where τn = Tn/(T1 + T2) is the thrust ratio. For equal thrusts, fth = KT /2; orfth =1/ √ 2 for the<br />
nominal velocity. The expression ft = fth cos 2 χ+sin 2 χ gives the required correction factor, with ft =1<br />
in edgewise flight. Optionally the correction for twin rotors can be omitted (ft =1); nominal (KT = √ 2);<br />
or use an input velocity factor in overlap region (KT ).<br />
11–8 Drag<br />
The rotor component includes drag forces acting on the hub and spinner (at zF hub ) and on the pylon<br />
(at zF pylon ). The component drag contributions must be consistent. In particular, a rotor with a spinner<br />
(such as on a tiltrotor aircraft) would likely not have hub drag. The pylon is the rotor support and the<br />
nacelle is the engine support. The drag model for a tiltrotor aircraft with tilting engines would use the<br />
pylon drag (and no nacelle drag), since the pylon is connected to the rotor shaft axes; with non-tilting<br />
engines it would use the nacelle drag as well.<br />
The body axes for the drag analysis are rotated about the y-axis relative to the rotor shaft axes:<br />
C BF = C BS C SF , where C BS = Y−θref . The pitch angle θref can be input, or the rotation appropriate for<br />
a helicopter rotor or a propeller can be specified.<br />
a) Consider a helicopter rotor, with the shaft axes oriented z-axis up and x-axis<br />
downstream. It is appropriate that the angle-of-attack is α =0for forward flight,<br />
and α = −90 degree for hover, meaning that the body axes are oriented z-axis down<br />
and x-axis forward. Hence θref = 180 degree.<br />
b) Consider a propeller or tiltrotor, with the shaft axes oriented z-axis forward and<br />
x-axis up. It is appropriate that the angle-of-attack is α =0in cruise and α =90<br />
degree for helicopter mode (with a tilting pylon), meaning that the body axes are<br />
oriented z-axis down and x-axis forward. Hence θref =90degree.<br />
The aerodynamic velocity relative to the air is calculated in component axes, v B . The angle-of-attack<br />
α and dynamic pressure q are calculated from v B . The reference areas for the drag coefficients are the<br />
rotor disk area A = πR 2 (for hub drag), pylon wetted area Spylon, and spinner wetted area Sspin; these<br />
areas are input or calculated as described previously.<br />
The hub drag can be fixed, specified as a drag area D/q; or the drag can be scaled, specified as a<br />
drag coefficient CD based on the rotor disk area A = πR 2 ; or the drag can be estimated based on the<br />
gross weight, using a squared-cubed relation or a square-root relation. Based on historical data, the drag<br />
coefficient CD =0.004 for typical hubs, CD =0.0024 for current low-drag hubs, and CD =0.0015 for<br />
faired hubs. For the squared-cubed relation: (D/q)hub = k(WMTO/1000) 2/3 (WMTO is the maximum<br />
takeoff gross weight; units of k are feet 2 /kilopound 2/3 or meter 2 /Megagram 2/3 ). Based on historical data,<br />
k =1.4 for typical hubs, k =0.8 for current low-drag hubs, and k =0.5 for faired hubs (English units).<br />
For the square-root relation: (D/q)hub = k WMTO/Nrotor (WMTO/Nrotor is the maximum takeoff gross