18.08.2013 Views

Download - NASA

Download - NASA

Download - NASA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Aircraft 61<br />

where Δz F = z F − z F cg. In hover and low speed, the download is calculated: F I z = k T (C IF F F ), the<br />

downward component of the aerodynamic force in inertial axes. <strong>Download</strong> can be expressed as a fraction<br />

of the total rotor vertical force, or as a fraction of gross weight. The aerodynamic model also calculates<br />

the interference velocities caused by this component at all other components: v F int = CFB v B int.<br />

Equations for the aerodynamics models are defined for all angles in radians. Input values of angles<br />

will, however, be in degrees.<br />

The aircraft neutral point is calculated from the airframe aerodynamics with all controls set to zero.<br />

The neutral point is here defined as the longitudinal position about which the derivative of the pitch<br />

moment with lift is zero. Hence SLna = SLcg − ΔM/ΔL, with the change in lift and moment calculated<br />

from the loads at angles of attack of 0 and 5 degree.<br />

7–8 Trailing-Edge Flaps<br />

The lifting surfaces have controls in the form of trailing-edge flaps: flap, flaperon, and aileron for<br />

wings; elevator or rudder for tails. The aerodynamic loads generated by flap deflection δf (radians) are<br />

estimated based on two-dimensional aerodynamic data (as summarized in refs. 1 and 2). Let ℓf = cf /c<br />

be the ratio of the flap chord to the wing chord. The lift coefficient is cℓ = cℓα(α + τηδf ), where<br />

η ∼ = 0.85 − 0.43δf is an empirical correction for viscous effects (ref. 1, eq. 3.54 and fig. 3.36). Thin<br />

airfoil theory gives<br />

τ =1− θf − sin θf<br />

π<br />

∼=<br />

<br />

sin( π<br />

2 ℓf<br />

n )<br />

with θf = cos −1 (2ℓf − 1) (ref. 1, eq. 3.56 and fig. 3.35; ref. 2, eq. 5.40). The last expression is an<br />

approximation that is a good fit to the thin airfoil theory result for n = 1/2, and a good approximation<br />

including the effects of real flow for n = 2/3 (ref. 2, fig. 5.18); the last expression with n = 2/3 is used<br />

here. The increase of maximum lift coefficient caused by flap deflection is less than the increase in lift<br />

coefficient, so the stall angle-of-attack is decreased. Approximately<br />

Δcℓmax ∼= (1 − ℓf )(1+ℓf − 5ℓ 2 f +3ℓ 3 f )<br />

Δcℓ<br />

(ref. 1, fig. 3.37). Thin airfoil theory gives the moment-coefficient increment about the quarter chord:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Δcm = −0.85 (1 − ℓf ) sin θf δf = −0.85 (1 − ℓf )2 (1 − ℓf )ℓf δf<br />

(ref. 1, eq. 3.57; ref. 2, eq. 5.41); with the factor of 0.85 accounting for real flow effects (ref. 2, fig. 5.19).<br />

The drag increment is estimated using<br />

ΔCD =0.9 ℓ 1.38<br />

f<br />

Sf<br />

S sin2 δf<br />

for slotted flaps (ref. 1, eq. 3.51). In summary, the section load increments are:<br />

Δcℓ = cℓα<br />

Δcℓmax = Xf Δcℓ<br />

cf<br />

c Lf ηf δf<br />

Δcm = cf<br />

c Mf δf<br />

The decrease in angle-of-attack for maximum lift is<br />

Δαmax = − Δcℓ − Δcℓmax<br />

= −(1 − Xf ) Δcℓ<br />

cℓα<br />

cℓα

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!