21.08.2013 Views

AP-G84/04 Best practice in road use data collection, analysis ... - WIM

AP-G84/04 Best practice in road use data collection, analysis ... - WIM

AP-G84/04 Best practice in road use data collection, analysis ... - WIM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Accessed by AR - ARRB TRANSPORT RESEARCH on <strong>04</strong> Feb 2005<br />

Aust<strong>road</strong>s 20<strong>04</strong><br />

— 11 —<br />

<strong>Best</strong> Practices <strong>in</strong> Road Use Data Collection, Analysis and Report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(b) Vehicle concatenation – When the space between two consecutive vehicles is small, it<br />

becomes difficult to separate the two vehicles us<strong>in</strong>g, say, a standard two axle sensor<br />

classifier. Where very high accuracy is required <strong>in</strong> a traffic operation (e.g. toll <strong>collection</strong>), a<br />

loop sensor may be <strong>use</strong>ful <strong>in</strong> separat<strong>in</strong>g vehicles by monitor<strong>in</strong>g the loop occupancy time. The<br />

loop can be placed between the two axles. The software for classification must be capable of<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>formation from the loop sensor. An <strong>in</strong>frared beam can also perform the function of<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g occupancy as an alternative to the loop (see (d) below).<br />

(c) Axle sensor array for multi-lane highway – There are situations when short-term classified<br />

counts are needed for each lane on multi-lane highways. An array of axle sensors may be<br />

needed if the equipment is unable to dist<strong>in</strong>guish traffic travell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> each lane, as shown <strong>in</strong><br />

Figure 5. By deduction, lane traffic can be determ<strong>in</strong>ed. For simplicity, only the configuration<br />

for axle or axle-pair counts is shown. An extra parallel set of sensors is needed for classified<br />

counts. An alternative arrangement is to locate an extra <strong>data</strong> logger <strong>in</strong> the median. This<br />

counter or logger can monitor one or more lanes of traffic closest to the median. Instructions<br />

from equipment manufacturers should be followed <strong>in</strong> a study.<br />

tube sensors<br />

and <strong>data</strong> logger<br />

median<br />

kerb<br />

Figure 5 – A sensor array for separate lane axle counts on a three-lane carriageway<br />

(d) Infrared axle sensor – Infrared beams are rout<strong>in</strong>ely <strong>use</strong>d <strong>in</strong> commerce and <strong>in</strong>dustry, e.g. as a<br />

‘doorbell’ <strong>in</strong> many shops. A beam is aimed from a transmitter to a receiv<strong>in</strong>g unit, and any<br />

break <strong>in</strong> the beam is processed to produce an electric signal, which can be <strong>use</strong>d to<br />

<strong>in</strong>crement a counter or sound a buzzer. In traffic applications a beam may be aimed across a<br />

<strong>road</strong>way or reflected from a raised pavement marker. The reflectors can be on the centrel<strong>in</strong>e<br />

(count<strong>in</strong>g one direction), or the far side of a two-lane <strong>road</strong> (count<strong>in</strong>g both directions).<br />

The beams should be close to the <strong>road</strong> surface as an alternative to a surface-mounted axle<br />

sensor. Potential problems <strong>in</strong>clude detector robustness and the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of beam<br />

alignment. The concept does offer the advantage of m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>in</strong>terference to the pavement<br />

and traffic stream, but it is still to be proven for multi-lane highway applications.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!