AP-G84/04 Best practice in road use data collection, analysis ... - WIM
AP-G84/04 Best practice in road use data collection, analysis ... - WIM
AP-G84/04 Best practice in road use data collection, analysis ... - WIM
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Accessed by AR - ARRB TRANSPORT RESEARCH on <strong>04</strong> Feb 2005<br />
Aust<strong>road</strong>s 20<strong>04</strong><br />
— 63 —<br />
<strong>Best</strong> Practices <strong>in</strong> Road Use Data Collection, Analysis and Report<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>AP</strong>PENDIX C – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW<br />
REPORT (RC2050-2)<br />
Scope<br />
This Report documents a literature review of typical traffic <strong>data</strong> <strong>collection</strong>, process<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>analysis</strong> and<br />
report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>practice</strong>s by major <strong>road</strong> agencies <strong>in</strong> Australia, Canada, United K<strong>in</strong>gdom (UK), New<br />
Zealand and the United States (US). The emphasis of the review was on highlight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>practice</strong>s<br />
that differ or are <strong>in</strong> addition to the NAASRA 1982 Guide. The features of the non-Australian<br />
<strong>practice</strong>s were also summarised and compared with the NAASRA Guide.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
In some <strong>in</strong>stances, the review was not able to f<strong>in</strong>d some specific <strong>in</strong>formation from the <strong>practice</strong>s<br />
reviewed. For example, <strong>use</strong>ful <strong>in</strong>formation about the frequency of traffic <strong>data</strong> <strong>collection</strong> was not<br />
available for New Zealand and the US and <strong>in</strong>formation about traffic <strong>data</strong> presentation was not<br />
found for New Zealand and the UK.<br />
Inconsistencies between <strong>practice</strong>s<br />
B<strong>road</strong> <strong>in</strong>consistencies between the reviewed <strong>road</strong> agency <strong>practice</strong>s were identified <strong>in</strong> regard to:<br />
the def<strong>in</strong>ition of the traffic <strong>in</strong>formation to be collected and reported;<br />
the traffic guidel<strong>in</strong>es and standards on the appropriate amount of traffic count<strong>in</strong>g (cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
vs. temporary count<strong>in</strong>g), the duration of temporary traffic count<strong>in</strong>g and the methodology of<br />
arrang<strong>in</strong>g traffic counter sites;<br />
vehicle classification systems, the type of equipment <strong>use</strong>d and the record<strong>in</strong>g of vehicle types;<br />
and,<br />
recommendations for achiev<strong>in</strong>g adequate levels of quality control and the required accuracy<br />
of traffic measurement.<br />
Future guidance<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs identified as a result of this review may form a basis to resolve the current<br />
<strong>in</strong>consistencies <strong>in</strong> traffic monitor<strong>in</strong>g procedures:<br />
the development of a consistent generic framework for traffic measurement, process<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
report<strong>in</strong>g that can accommodate variations <strong>in</strong> equipment technology and differ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>road</strong><br />
network characteristics;<br />
the development of a systematic approach to traffic monitor<strong>in</strong>g and report<strong>in</strong>g that captures<br />
changes from previous monitor<strong>in</strong>g and report<strong>in</strong>g;<br />
a consistent approach to the estimation of annual average daily traffic (AADT) and other<br />
fundamental traffic measurement parameters;<br />
the development of a sound and defensible basis for traffic adjustment factors <strong>use</strong>d dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>data</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g; and,<br />
the development of pr<strong>in</strong>ciples for clear quality control procedures cover<strong>in</strong>g equipment<br />
calibration, quantification of equipment accuracy and the accuracy required for the estimated<br />
traffic parameters.