How far does screening women for domestic (partner) - NIHR Health ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

84 References of a managed care organization. Prev Med 1999;29:431–40. 79. Coker AL, Pope BO, Smith PH, Sanderson M, Hussey JR. Assessment of clinical partner violence screening tools. J Am Med Womens Assoc 2001;56:19– 23. 80. Ernst AA, Weiss SJ, Cham E, Hall L, Nick T. Detecting ongoing intimate partner violence in the emergency department using a simple 4-question screen: the OVAT. Violence Vict 2004;19:375–84. 81. Chen P, Rovi S, Vega M, Jacabs A, Johnson M. Screening for domestic violence in a prodominantly Hispanic clinical setting. Fam Pract 2005;22:617–23. 82. Sherin KM, Sinacore JM, Li XQ, Zitter RE, Shakil A. HITS: a short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting. Fam Med 1998;30:508–12. 83. Reichenheim M, Moraes C. Comparison between the abuse assessment screen and the revised conflict tactics scales for measuring physical violence during pregnancy. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2003;58:523– 7. 84. Feldhaus KM, Koziol-McLain J, Amsbury HL, Norton IM, Lowenstein SR, Abbott JT. Accuracy of 3 brief screening questions for detecting partner violence in the emergency department. JAMA 1997;277:1357–61. 85. MacMillan HL, Wathen CN, Jamieson E, Boyle M, McNutt LA, Worster A, et al. Approaches to screening for intimate partner violence in health care settings: a randomized trial. JAMA 2006;296:530–6. 86. Paranjape A, Rask K, Liebschutz J. Utility of STaT for the identification of recent intimate partner violence. J Natl Med Assoc 2006;98:1663–9. 87. Bonomi AE, Thompson RS, Anderson M, Rivara FP, Holt VL, Carrell D, et al. Ascertainment of intimate partner violence using two abuse measurement frameworks. Inj Prev 2006;12:121–4. 88. Peralta RL, Fleming MF. Screening for intimate partner violence in a primary care setting: the validity of ‘feeling safe at home’ and prevalence results. J Am Board Fam Pract 2003;16:525–32. 89. McFarlane J, Parker B, Soeken K, Bullock L. Assessing for abuse during pregnancy. Severity and frequency of injuries and associated entry into prenatal care. JAMA 1992;267:3176–8. 90. Sagrestano LM, Rodriguez AC, Carroll D, Bieniarz A, Greenberg A, Castro L, et al. A comparison of standardized measures of psychosocial variables with single-item screening measures used in an urban obstetric clinic. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2002;31:147–55. 91. Brown JB, Lent B, Schmidt G, Sas G. Application of the Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST) and WAST-short in the family practice setting. J Fam Pract 2000;49:896–903. 92. Connelly CD, Newton RR, Landsverk J, Aarons GA. Assessment of intimate partner violence among high-risk postpartum mothers: concordance of clinical measures. Women Health 2000;31:21–37. 93. Brown JB, Schmidt G, Lent B, Sas G, Lemelin J. [Screening for violence against women. Validation and feasibility studies of a French screening tool.] Can Fam Physician 2001;47:988–95 [in French]. 94. Fogarty CT, Burge S, McCord EC. Communicating with patients about intimate partner violence: screening and interviewing approaches. Fam Med 2002;34:369–75. 95. Belknap RA, Sayeed P. Te contaria mi vida: I would tell you my life, if only you would ask. Health Care Women Int 2003;24:723–37. 96. Stenson K, Saarinen H, Heimer G, Sidenvall B. Women’s attitudes to being asked about exposure to violence. Midwifery 2001;17:2–10. 97. Hathaway JE, Willis G, Zimmer B. Listening to survivors’ voices. Addressing partner abuse in the health care setting. Violence Against Women 2002;8:687–719. 98. Chang JC, Decker MR, Moracco KE, Martin SL, Petersen R, Frasier P. Asking about intimate partner violence: advice from female survivors to health care providers. Patient Educ Couns 2005;59:141–7. 99. Chang JC, Cluss PA, Ranieri L, Hawker L, Buranosky R, Dado D, et al. Health care interventions for intimate partner violence: what women want. Womens Health Issues 2005;15:21–30. 100. Lutz K. Abused pregnant women’s interactions with health care providers during the childbearing year. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2005;34:151–62. 101. McCaw B, Berman WH, Syme SL, Hunkeler E. Beyond screening for domestic violence. A systems model approach in a managed care setting. Am J Prev Med 2001;21:170–6. 102. Renker PR, Tonkin P. Women’s views of prenatal violence screening: acceptability and confidentiality issues. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:348–54. 103. Hurley KF, Brown M, Campbell SG, Wallace T, Venugopal R, Baggs D. Emergency department
DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Technology Assessment 2009; Vol. 13: No. 16 patients’ opinions of screening for intimate partner violence among women. Emerg Med J 2005;22:97–8. 104. Weinsheimer RL, Schermer CR, Malcoe LH, Balduf LM, Bloomfield LA. Severe intimate partner violence and alcohol use among female trauma patients. J Trauma 2005;58:22–9. 105. Glass N, Dearwater S, Campbell J. Intimate partner violence screening and intervention: data from eleven Pennsylvania and California community hospital emergency departments. J Emerg Nurs 2001;27:141–9. 106. Brzank P, Hellbernd H, Maschewsky-Schneider U. [Domestic violence against women: negative health consequences and need for care – results of a survey among first-aid-patients in the framework of the S.I.G.n.A.L. – accompanying research.] Gesundheitswesen 2004;66:164–9 [in German]. 107. Romito P, De M, Turan J, Bottaretto R, Tavi M. Identifying violence among women patients attending family practices: the role of research in community change. J Community Appl Soc 2004;14:250–65. 108. Bair-Merritt MH, Mollen CJ, Yau PL, Fein JA. Impact of domestic violence posters on female caregivers’ opinions about domestic violence screening and disclosure in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2006;22:689–93. 109. Caralis PV, Musialowski R. Women’s experiences with domestic violence and their attitudes and expectations regarding medical care of abuse victims. South Med J 1997;90:1075–80. 110. Friedman LS, Samet JH, Roberts MS, Hudlin M, Hans P. Inquiry about victimization experiences – a survey of patient preferences and physician practices. Arch Intern Med 1992;152:1186–90. 111. Gielen AC, O’Campo PJ, Campbell JC, Schollenberger J, Woods AB, Jones AS, et al. Women’s opinions about domestic violence screening and mandatory reporting. Am J Prev Med 2000;19:279–85. 112. McDonnell E, Holohan M, Reilly MO, Warde L, Collins C, Geary M. Acceptability of routine inquiry regarding domestic violence in the antenatal clinic. Ir Med J 2006;99:123–4. 113. McNutt LA, Carlson BE, Gagen D, Winterbauer N. Reproductive violence screening in primary care: perspectives and experiences of patients and battered women. J Am Med Womens Assoc 1999;54:85–90. 114. Newman JD, Sheehan KM, Powell EC. Screening for intimate-partner violence in the pediatric © 2009 Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO. All rights reserved. emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2005;21:79–83. 115. Zeitler MS, Paine AD, Breitbart V, Rickert VI, Olson C, Stevens L, et al. Attitudes about intimate partner violence screening among an ethnically diverse sample of young women. J Adolesc Health 2006;39:119.e1–8 . 116. Webster J, Stratigos S, Grimes K. Women’s responses to screening for domestic violence in a health-care setting. Midwifery 2001;17:289–94. 117. Witting MD, Furuno JP, Hirshon JM, Krugman SD, Perisse AR, Limcangco R. Support for emergency department screening for intimate partner violence depends on perceived risk. J Interpers Violence 2006;21:585–96. 118. Zink T, Levin L, Wollan P, Putnam F. Mothers’ comfort with screening questions about sensitive issues, including domestic violence. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:358–67. 119. Bacchus L, Mezey GC, Bewley S. Women’s perceptions and experiences of routine enquiry for domestic violence in a maternity service. BJOG 2002;109:9–16. 120. Dowd MD, Kennedy C, Knapp JF, Stallbaumer R. Mothers’ and health care providers’ perspectives on screening for intimate partner violence in a pediatric emergency department. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:794–99. 121. Tiwari A, Leung WC, Leung TW, Humphreys J, Parker B, Ho PC. A randomised controlled trial of empowerment training for Chinese abused pregnant women in Hong Kong. BJOG 2005;112:1249–56. 122. Constantino R, Kim Y, Crane P. Effects of a social support intervention on health outcomes in residents of a domestic violence shelter: a pilot study. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2005;26:575–90. 123. McFarlane J, Groff JY, O’Brien JA, Watson K. Secondary prevention of intimate partner violence. A randomized controlled trial. Nurs Res 2006;55:52–61. 124. Sullivan C, Bybee D, Allen N. Findings from a community-based program for battered women and their children. J Interpers Violence 2002;17:915–36. 125. Bybee DI, Sullivan CM. The process through which an advocacy intervention resulted in positive change for battered women over time. Am J Community Psychol 2002;30:103–32. 85
Page 1 and 2:
How far does screening women for do
Page 3 and 4:
How far does screening women for do
Page 5 and 6:
DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Techno
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11:
Page 14 and 15:
xii Executive summary and quantitat
Page 17 and 18:
Aims of the review This review has
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43:
Page 46 and 47:
30 Review Question II tools were us
Page 48 and 49:
32 Review Question II of controllin
Page 50 and 51: 34 Review Question II Table 6 Ranke
Page 52 and 53: 36 Review Question II Methodologica
Page 55 and 56: DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Techno
Page 61: DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Techno
Page 64 and 65: 48 Review Question IV access resour
Page 66 and 67: 50 Review Question IV woman’s nee
Page 68 and 69: 52 Review Question IV cognitive the
Page 70 and 71: 54 Review Question IV developing a
Page 72 and 73: 56 Review Question IV Sullivan and
Page 74 and 75: 58 Review Question IV the potential
Page 76 and 77: 60 Review Question V primary care c
Page 78 and 79: 62 Review Question V include incomp
Page 80 and 81: 64 Review Question VI preferred inc
Page 82 and 83: 66 Review Question VI Barnett 188 s
Page 84 and 85: 68 Review Question VI Discussion Th
Page 86 and 87: 70 Review Question VII would also b
Page 88 and 89: 72 Review Question VII transition p
Page 90 and 91: 74 Conclusions and implications for
Page 92 and 93: 76 Conclusions and implications for
Page 95: DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Techno
Page 98 and 99: 82 References project: details and
Page 102 and 103: 86 References 126. Sullivan CM, Byb
Page 104 and 105: 88 References 175. Edin KE, Högber
Page 106 and 107: 90 References 226. Parker B, McFarl
Page 108 and 109: 92 References report from the Briti
Page 110 and 111: 94 References 328. Campbell DW, Cam
Page 112 and 113: 96 References 381. Kramer A, Lorenz
Page 114 and 115: 98 References violence. J Obstet Gy
Page 116 and 117: 100 References to the mental health
Page 118 and 119: 102 References 541. Groves B. Menta
Page 120 and 121: 104 References residents about dome
Page 122 and 123: 106 References 645. Harris JM, Kuto
Page 124 and 125: 108 References 699. Jones RF III. D
Page 126 and 127: 110 References 752. Zachary MJ, Sch
Page 128 and 129: 112 References 811. Rickert VI, Vau
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153:
This version of the monograph does
show all

How far does screening women for domestic (partner) - NIHR Health ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?