How far does screening women for domestic (partner) - NIHR Health ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

88 References 175. Edin KE, Högberg U. Violence against pregnant women will remain hidden as long as no direct questions are asked. Midwifery 2002;18:268–78. 176. Stenson K, Sidenvall B, Heimer G. Midwives’ experiences of routine antenatal questioning relating to men’s violence against women. Midwifery 2005;21:311–21. 177. Mezey GC, Bacchus L, Haworth A, Bewley S. Midwives’ perceptions and experiences of routine enquiry for domestic violence. BJOG 2003;110:744– 52. 178. Taylor P, Zaichkin J, Pilkey D, Leconte J, Johnson BK, Peterson AC. Prenatal screening for substance use and violence: findings from physician focus groups. Matern Child Health J 2006;11:241–7. 179. McCosker H, Kain V, Anderson DJ, Webster J. The impact on midwives of undertaking screening for domestic violence: focus group findings. Birth Issues 2005;14:49–56. 180. Loughlin S, Spinola C, Stewart L, Fanslow J, Norton R. Emergency department staff responses to a protocol of care for abused women. Health Educ Behav 2000;27:572–90. 181. Minsky-Kelly D, Hamberger L, Pape D, Wolff M. We’ve had training, now what?: qualitative analysis of barriers to domestic violence screening and referral in a health care setting. J Interpers Violence 2005;20:1288–309. 182. Hindin PK. Intimate partner violence screening practices of certified nurse-midwives. J Midwifery Womens Health 2006;51:216–21. 183. Price S, Baird K, Salmon D. Asking the question: antenatal domestic violence. Pract Midwife 2005;8:21–5. 184. Bair-Merritt MH, Giardino AP, Turner M, Ganetsky M, Christian CW. Pediatric residency training on domestic violence: a national survey. Ambulatory Pediatrics 2004;4:24–7. 185. Bair-Merritt MH, Mollen CJ, Yau PL, Fein JA. Health care providers’ opinions on intimate partner violence resources and screening in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2006;22:150–3. 186. Baig A, Shadigian E, Heisler M. Hidden from plain sight: residents’ domestic violence screening attitudes and reported practices. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:949–54. 187. Baird K. Domestic violence: learning to ask the question. Pract Midwife 2005;8:18–22. 188. Barnett C. Exploring midwives’ attitudes to domestic violence screening. Br J Midwifery 2005;13:702–5. 189. Ellis JM. Barriers to effective screening for domestic violence by registered nurses in the emergency department. Crit Care Nurs Q 1999;22:27–41. 190. Fikree FF, Jafarey SN, Korejo R, Khan A, Durocher JM. Pakistani obstetricians’ recognition of and attitude towards domestic violence screening. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2004;87:59–65. 191. Goff H, Byrd T, Shelton A, Parcel G. Health care professionals’ skills, beliefs, and expectations about screening for domestic violence in a border community. Fam Commun Health 2001;24:39–54. 192. Lazenbatt A, Thompson-Cree ME, McMurray F. The use of exploratory factor analysis in evaluating midwives’ attitudes and stereotypical myths related to the identification and management of domestic violence in practice. Midwifery 2005;21:322–34. 193. Nayak MB. Factors influencing hesitancy in medical students to assess history of victimization in patients. J Interpers Violence 2000;15:123–33. 194. Nicolaidis C, Curry M, Gerrity M. Health care workers’ expectations and empathy toward patients in abusive relationships. J Am Board Fam Pract 2005;18:159–65. 195. Price S, Baird K. Tackling domestic violence: an audit of professional practice. Pract Midwife 2003;6:15–18. 196. Richardson J, Feder G, Eldridge S, Chung WS, Coid J, Moorey S. Women who experience domestic violence and women survivors of childhood sexual abuse: a survey of health professionals’ attitudes and clinical practice. Br J Gen Pract 2001;51:468–70. 197. Roelens K, Verstraelen H, Van EK, Temmerman M. A knowledge, attitudes, and practice survey among obstetrician-gynaecologists on intimate partner violence in Flanders, Belgium. BMC Public Health 2006;6:238. 198. Salmon D, Murphy S, Baird K. An evaluation of the effectiveness of an educational programme promoting the introduction of routine antenatal enquiry for domestic violence. Midwifery 2006;22:6– 14. 199. Shye D, Feldman V, Hokanson CS, Mullooly JP. Secondary prevention of domestic violence in HMO primary care: evaluation of alternative implementation strategies. Am J Manag Care 2004;10:706–16.
DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Technology Assessment 2009; Vol. 13: No. 16 200. Straus MA. Medical care costs of intrafamily assault and homicide. Bull N Y Acad Med 1986;62:556–61. 201. Finlayson T, Saltzman L, Sheridan D, Taylor W. Estimating hospital charges associated with intimate violence. Violence Against Women 1999;5:313–35. 202. Varjavand N, Cohen DG, Novack DH. An assessment of residents’ abilities to detect and manage domestic violence. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17:465–8. 203. Coker AL, Reeder CE, Fadden MK, Smith PH. Physical partner violence and medicaid utilization and expenditures. Public Health Rep 2004;119:557– 67. 204. Ulrich Y, Cain KC, Sugg NK, Rivara FP, Rubanowice DM, Thompson RS. Medical care utilization patterns in women with diagnosed domestic violence. Am J Prev Med 2003;24:9–15. 205. Wisner CL, Gilmer TP, Saltzman LE, Zink TM. Intimate partner violence against women: do victims cost health plans more? J Fam Pract 1999;48:439–43. 206. Clark KA, Biddle AK, Martin SL. A cost-benefit analysis of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. Violence Against Women 2002;8:417–28. [Published erratum appears in Violence Against Women 2003;9:136.] 207. Domino M, Morrissey JP, Nadlicki-Patterson T, Chung S. Service costs for women with cooccurring disorders and trauma. J Subst Abuse Treat 2005;28:135–43. 208. Domino ME, Morrissey JP, Chung S, Huntington N, Larson MJ, Russell LA. Service use and costs for women with co-occurring mental and substance use disorders and a history of violence. Psychiat Serv 2005;56:1223–32. 209. Sohal A, Eldridge S, Feder GS. The sensitivity and specificity of four questions (HARK) to identify intimate partner violence: a diagnostic accuracy study in general practice. BMC Fam Pract 2007;8:49. 210. Barkham M, Stiles WB, Shapiro DA. The shape of change in psychotherapy: longitudinal assessment of personal problems. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993;61:667–77. 211. Taket A. Tackling domestic violence: the role of health professionals. Development and Practice Report, 2004. URL: www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/ dpr32.pdf 2004. Accessed December 2008. 212. Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts CH. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on © 2009 Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO. All rights reserved. women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet 2006;368:1260–9. 213. Department of Health. Responding to domestic violence: a handbook for health professionals. London: Department of Health; 2005. 214. Bradley F, Smith M, Long J, O’Dowd T. Reported frequency of domestic violence: cross sectional survey of women attending general practice. BMJ 2002;324:271. 215. Chamberlain L. The USPSTF recommendation on intimate partner violence: what we can learn from it and what we can do about it. Fam Violence Prevention Health Pract 2005;1:1–21. 216. Briss PA, Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Zaza S. Developing and using the Guide to Community Preventive Services: lessons learned about evidencebased public health. Annu Rev Public Health 2004;25:281–302. 217. Yegidis BL. Abuse risk inventory manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press; 1989. 218. Hegarty K, Sheehan M, Schonfeld C. A multidimensional definition of partner abuse: development and preliminary validation of the Composite Abuse Scale. J Fam Violence 1999;14:399– 415. 219. Hegarty K, Bush R, Sheehan M. The composite abuse scale: further development and assessment of reliability and validity of a multidimensional partner abuse measure in clinical settings. Violence Vict 2005;20:529–47. 220. Straus MA. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the Conflict Tactics (CT) scales. J Marriage Fam 1979;41:75–88. 221. Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, Sugarman DB. The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues 1996;17:283–316. 222. Campbell JC. Nursing assessment for risk of homicide with battered women. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1986;8:36–51. 223. Berk RA, Berk SF, Loseke DR. Mutual combat and other family myths. In Finkelhor D, Gelles RJ, Hotaling GT, editors. The dark side of families. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1983. pp. 197–212. 224. Hudson WW, McIntosh SR. The assessment of spouse abuse: two quantifiable dimensions. J Marriage Fam 1981;43:873–88. 225. Hudson WW. Partner abuse scale physical. Tempe, AZ: Walmyr Publishing; 1991. 89
Page 1 and 2:
How far does screening women for do
Page 3 and 4:
How far does screening women for do
Page 5 and 6:
DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Techno
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11:
Page 14 and 15:
xii Executive summary and quantitat
Page 17 and 18:
Aims of the review This review has
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43:
Page 46 and 47:
30 Review Question II tools were us
Page 48 and 49:
32 Review Question II of controllin
Page 50 and 51:
34 Review Question II Table 6 Ranke
Page 52 and 53:
36 Review Question II Methodologica
Page 55 and 56: DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Techno
Page 61: DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Techno
Page 64 and 65: 48 Review Question IV access resour
Page 66 and 67: 50 Review Question IV woman’s nee
Page 68 and 69: 52 Review Question IV cognitive the
Page 70 and 71: 54 Review Question IV developing a
Page 72 and 73: 56 Review Question IV Sullivan and
Page 74 and 75: 58 Review Question IV the potential
Page 76 and 77: 60 Review Question V primary care c
Page 78 and 79: 62 Review Question V include incomp
Page 80 and 81: 64 Review Question VI preferred inc
Page 82 and 83: 66 Review Question VI Barnett 188 s
Page 84 and 85: 68 Review Question VI Discussion Th
Page 86 and 87: 70 Review Question VII would also b
Page 88 and 89: 72 Review Question VII transition p
Page 90 and 91: 74 Conclusions and implications for
Page 92 and 93: 76 Conclusions and implications for
Page 95: DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Techno
Page 98 and 99: 82 References project: details and
Page 100 and 101: 84 References of a managed care org
Page 102 and 103: 86 References 126. Sullivan CM, Byb
Page 106 and 107: 90 References 226. Parker B, McFarl
Page 108 and 109: 92 References report from the Briti
Page 110 and 111: 94 References 328. Campbell DW, Cam
Page 112 and 113: 96 References 381. Kramer A, Lorenz
Page 114 and 115: 98 References violence. J Obstet Gy
Page 116 and 117: 100 References to the mental health
Page 118 and 119: 102 References 541. Groves B. Menta
Page 120 and 121: 104 References residents about dome
Page 122 and 123: 106 References 645. Harris JM, Kuto
Page 124 and 125: 108 References 699. Jones RF III. D
Page 126 and 127: 110 References 752. Zachary MJ, Sch
Page 128 and 129: 112 References 811. Rickert VI, Vau
Page 153: This version of the monograph does
show all

How far does screening women for domestic (partner) - NIHR Health ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?