31.08.2013 Views

How far does screening women for domestic (partner) - NIHR Health ...

How far does screening women for domestic (partner) - NIHR Health ...

How far does screening women for domestic (partner) - NIHR Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 <strong>Health</strong> Technology Assessment 2009; Vol. 13: No. 16<br />

© 2009 Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO. All rights reserved.<br />

Chapter 7<br />

Are interventions effective once <strong>partner</strong><br />

violence is disclosed in a health-care setting?<br />

(Question IV)<br />

We found 33 studies measuring the<br />

effectiveness of interventions <strong>for</strong> <strong>women</strong><br />

who have experienced <strong>partner</strong> violence and<br />

their children. Nineteen of these studies were<br />

examined in a previous systematic review, 11 and<br />

have been summarised below with the new studies.<br />

Publication dates of the 14 studies not included in<br />

the previous review range from 2000 to 2006. The<br />

majority of these new studies were conducted in<br />

the USA, a few were conducted in Canada, two in<br />

Spain, one in Mexico and one in Hong Kong. The<br />

settings varied and included refuges, community<br />

settings, <strong>women</strong>’s homes, antenatal clinics, a<br />

methadone maintenance programme and primary<br />

care ‘public health’ clinics. Study designs included<br />

nine randomised controlled trials, two case–control<br />

studies and two be<strong>for</strong>e-and-after studies. For details<br />

of the included studies see Appendix 7.1. For<br />

results and quality scores of studies see Appendix<br />

7.2. The assessments of individual studies using the<br />

USPSTF criteria and the Jadad tool are detailed in<br />

Appendices 7.3 and 7.4, respectively.<br />

No qualitative studies were found that explored<br />

what outcomes abused <strong>women</strong> want <strong>for</strong> themselves<br />

and their children from programmes that include<br />

<strong>screening</strong> or other health-care based interventions.<br />

Advocacy interventions<br />

with abused <strong>women</strong><br />

Eleven studies (four newly reviewed and seven from<br />

our previous review) evaluated the use of advocacy<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>women</strong> experiencing <strong>partner</strong> violence: one in<br />

Hong Kong, one in Canada and nine in the USA.<br />

Studies published since<br />

our previous review<br />

In an individually randomised controlled trial<br />

of an advocacy intervention in an urban public<br />

hospital antenatal ward, conducted by Tiwari et<br />

al., 121 advocacy benefited abused pregnant <strong>women</strong><br />

who were still in a relationship with the abuser.<br />

Abused <strong>women</strong> at less than 30 weeks’ gestation<br />

and identified by <strong>screening</strong> were randomised to<br />

the intervention group, which received advice on<br />

safety, choice-making and problem-solving, or<br />

to the control group, which received a referral<br />

card listing community resources and sources of<br />

<strong>partner</strong> violence services. The intervention sessions<br />

lasted about 30 minutes, and afterwards <strong>women</strong><br />

were given a brochure rein<strong>for</strong>cing the in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

provided. Follow-up was 6 weeks post-delivery,<br />

and hence ranged from 16 to 34 weeks from the<br />

intervention, depending on gestational age at<br />

recruitment. At follow-up, the intervention group<br />

reported significantly less psychological abuse<br />

and less minor physical abuse; however, the rate<br />

of severe abuse and sexual abuse did not differ<br />

between the groups. The intervention group had<br />

significantly greater physical functioning and<br />

significantly improved scores on role limitation<br />

measures <strong>for</strong> both physical and emotional<br />

problems. Although the <strong>women</strong> did not report<br />

any adverse effects as a result of participation in<br />

the study, the intervention group reported more<br />

bodily pain than the control group. There were<br />

no differences between groups on outcomes of<br />

general health, vitality, social functioning and<br />

mental health. Significantly fewer <strong>women</strong> in the<br />

intervention group had postnatal depression at<br />

follow-up than in the control group.<br />

A pilot study by Constantino and colleagues<br />

of an advocacy intervention with a therapeutic<br />

component was conducted with first-time residents<br />

of an urban <strong>domestic</strong> violence refuge. 122 This<br />

individually randomised controlled trial compared<br />

a structured nurse-led social support intervention<br />

with unstructured discussion sessions. Both groups<br />

continued to receive standard refuge services. The<br />

intervention comprised eight weekly sessions (each<br />

lasting 90 minutes) and sought to empower abused<br />

<strong>women</strong> through the provision of four dimensions<br />

of social support: belonging, evaluation, selfesteem<br />

and tangible support (BEST). It provided<br />

resources to the <strong>women</strong> as well as in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

on further resources; it allowed them time to<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!