How far does screening women for domestic (partner) - NIHR Health ...
How far does screening women for domestic (partner) - NIHR Health ...
How far does screening women for domestic (partner) - NIHR Health ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 <strong>Health</strong> Technology Assessment 2009; Vol. 13: No. 16<br />
© 2009 Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO. All rights reserved.<br />
Chapter 7<br />
Are interventions effective once <strong>partner</strong><br />
violence is disclosed in a health-care setting?<br />
(Question IV)<br />
We found 33 studies measuring the<br />
effectiveness of interventions <strong>for</strong> <strong>women</strong><br />
who have experienced <strong>partner</strong> violence and<br />
their children. Nineteen of these studies were<br />
examined in a previous systematic review, 11 and<br />
have been summarised below with the new studies.<br />
Publication dates of the 14 studies not included in<br />
the previous review range from 2000 to 2006. The<br />
majority of these new studies were conducted in<br />
the USA, a few were conducted in Canada, two in<br />
Spain, one in Mexico and one in Hong Kong. The<br />
settings varied and included refuges, community<br />
settings, <strong>women</strong>’s homes, antenatal clinics, a<br />
methadone maintenance programme and primary<br />
care ‘public health’ clinics. Study designs included<br />
nine randomised controlled trials, two case–control<br />
studies and two be<strong>for</strong>e-and-after studies. For details<br />
of the included studies see Appendix 7.1. For<br />
results and quality scores of studies see Appendix<br />
7.2. The assessments of individual studies using the<br />
USPSTF criteria and the Jadad tool are detailed in<br />
Appendices 7.3 and 7.4, respectively.<br />
No qualitative studies were found that explored<br />
what outcomes abused <strong>women</strong> want <strong>for</strong> themselves<br />
and their children from programmes that include<br />
<strong>screening</strong> or other health-care based interventions.<br />
Advocacy interventions<br />
with abused <strong>women</strong><br />
Eleven studies (four newly reviewed and seven from<br />
our previous review) evaluated the use of advocacy<br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>women</strong> experiencing <strong>partner</strong> violence: one in<br />
Hong Kong, one in Canada and nine in the USA.<br />
Studies published since<br />
our previous review<br />
In an individually randomised controlled trial<br />
of an advocacy intervention in an urban public<br />
hospital antenatal ward, conducted by Tiwari et<br />
al., 121 advocacy benefited abused pregnant <strong>women</strong><br />
who were still in a relationship with the abuser.<br />
Abused <strong>women</strong> at less than 30 weeks’ gestation<br />
and identified by <strong>screening</strong> were randomised to<br />
the intervention group, which received advice on<br />
safety, choice-making and problem-solving, or<br />
to the control group, which received a referral<br />
card listing community resources and sources of<br />
<strong>partner</strong> violence services. The intervention sessions<br />
lasted about 30 minutes, and afterwards <strong>women</strong><br />
were given a brochure rein<strong>for</strong>cing the in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
provided. Follow-up was 6 weeks post-delivery,<br />
and hence ranged from 16 to 34 weeks from the<br />
intervention, depending on gestational age at<br />
recruitment. At follow-up, the intervention group<br />
reported significantly less psychological abuse<br />
and less minor physical abuse; however, the rate<br />
of severe abuse and sexual abuse did not differ<br />
between the groups. The intervention group had<br />
significantly greater physical functioning and<br />
significantly improved scores on role limitation<br />
measures <strong>for</strong> both physical and emotional<br />
problems. Although the <strong>women</strong> did not report<br />
any adverse effects as a result of participation in<br />
the study, the intervention group reported more<br />
bodily pain than the control group. There were<br />
no differences between groups on outcomes of<br />
general health, vitality, social functioning and<br />
mental health. Significantly fewer <strong>women</strong> in the<br />
intervention group had postnatal depression at<br />
follow-up than in the control group.<br />
A pilot study by Constantino and colleagues<br />
of an advocacy intervention with a therapeutic<br />
component was conducted with first-time residents<br />
of an urban <strong>domestic</strong> violence refuge. 122 This<br />
individually randomised controlled trial compared<br />
a structured nurse-led social support intervention<br />
with unstructured discussion sessions. Both groups<br />
continued to receive standard refuge services. The<br />
intervention comprised eight weekly sessions (each<br />
lasting 90 minutes) and sought to empower abused<br />
<strong>women</strong> through the provision of four dimensions<br />
of social support: belonging, evaluation, selfesteem<br />
and tangible support (BEST). It provided<br />
resources to the <strong>women</strong> as well as in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
on further resources; it allowed them time to<br />
47