How far does screening women for domestic (partner) - NIHR Health ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

106 References 645. Harris JM, Kutob RM, Surprenant ZJ, Maiuro RD, Delate TA. Can internet-based education improve physician confidence in dealing with domestic violence? Fam Med 2002;34:287–92. 646. Gerber MR, Leiter KS, Hermann RC, Bor DH. How and why community hospital clinicians document a positive screen for intimate partner violence: a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Prac 2005;6:48–58. 647. D’Avolio D, Hawkins JW, Haggerty LA, Kelly U, Barrett R, Durno Toscano SE, et al. Screening for abuse: barriers and opportunities. Health Care Women Int 2001;22:349–62. 648. Kripke EN, Steele G, O’Brien MK, Novack DH. Domestic violence training program for residents. J Gen Intern Med 1998;13:839–41. 649. Danis FS. Social work response to domestic violence: encouraging news from a new look. AFFILIA J Women Soc Work 2003;18:177–91. 650. Gunn J, Hegarty K, Nagle C, Forster D, Brown S, Lumley J. Putting woman-centered care into practice: a new (ANEW) approach to psychosocial risk assessment during pregnancy. Birth 2006;33:46–55. 651. Valdez S, Arenas M, Hernández T. The midwives’ experiences in the identification of battered women in pregnancy. Salud Publica Mex 2004;46:56–63. 652. Krueger PM, Schafer S. Physician awareness of domestic violence: does continuing medical education have an impact? J Am Osteopath Assoc 2000;100:145–8. 653. Lavoie F, Martin G. Psychosocial assistance offered by physicians to abused women. Can J Public Health 1991;82:101–3. 654. Leblanc L, Ouellet N. [Screening for spousal abuse: the nurse’s role.] Perspective infirmière: Revue Officielle de l’Ordre des Infirmières et Infirmiers du Quebec 2004;1:39–43 [in French]. 655. Role of victims’ services in improving IPV screening by trained maternal and child health-care providers. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report 2000;49(06):114– 17. 656. Zink T, Elder N, Jacobson J. How children affect the mother/victim’s process in intimate partner violence. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003;157:587–92. 657. Saunders DG, Holter MC, Pahl LC, Tolman RM, Kenna CE. TANF workers’ responses to battered women and the impact of brief worker training: what survivors report. Violence Against Women 2005;11:227–54. 658. Scobie J, McGuire M. The silent enemy: domestic violence in pregnancy. Br J Midwifery 1999;7:259– 62. 659. Zink T, Siegel R, Chen L, Levin L, Pabst S, Putnam F. Physician knowledge and management of children exposed to domestic violence in Ohio: a comparison of pediatricians and family physicians. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2005;44:211–19. 660. Borowsky IW, Ireland M. Parental screening for intimate partner violence by pediatricians and family physicians. Pediatrics 2002;110:509–16. 661. Lapidus G, Beaulieu C, Gelven E, Sherman K, Duncan M, Banco L. A statewide survey of domestic violence screening behaviors among pediatricians and family physicians. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:332–6. 662. Glaister J, Kesling G. A survey of practicing nurses’ perspectives on interpersonal violence screening and intervention. Nurs Outlook 2002;50:137–43. 663. Gerbert B, Gansky S, Tang J, McPhee S, Carlton R, Herzig K, et al. Domestic violence compared to other health risks: a survey of physicians’ beliefs and behaviors. Am J Prev Med 2002;23:82–90. 664. Gadomski A, Wolff D, Tripp M, Lewis C, Short L. Changes in health care providers’ knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors regarding domestic violence, following a multifaceted intervention. Acad Med 2001;76:1045–52. 665. Chamberlain L, Perham H. The impact of perceived barriers on primary care physicians’ screening practices for female partner abuse. Women Health 2002;35:55–69. 666. Goff H, Shelton AJ, Byrd T, Parcel G. Preparedness of health care practitioners to screen women for domestic violence in a border community. Health Care Women Int 2003;24:135–48. 667. McGrath ME, Bettacchi A, Duffy SJ, Peipert JF, Becker BM St A. Violence against women: provider barriers to intervention in emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med 1997;4:297–300. 668. Zink T, Regan S, Goldenbar L, Pabst S, Rinto B. Intimate partner violence: what are physicians’ perceptions? J Am Board Fam Pract 2004;17:332–40. 669. Steen M, Bharj K. Midwives’ reflections: exploring attitudes, feelings and experiences when caring for women who are being abused. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 2003;13:115–18. 670. Price S, Baird K. Domestic violence in pregnancy: how can midwives make a difference? Pract Midwife 2001;4:12–14.
DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Technology Assessment 2009; Vol. 13: No. 16 671. Moore ML, Zaccaro D, Parsons LH. Attitudes and practices of registered nurses toward women who have experienced abuse/domestic violence. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1998;27:175–82. 672. Brown JB, Lent B, Sas G. Identifying and treating wife abuse. J Fam Pract 1993;36:185–91. 673. Dickson F, Tutty LM. The role of public health nurses in responding to abused women. Public Health Nurs 1996;13:263–8. 674. Horan DL, Chapin J, Klein L, Schmidt LA, Schulkin J. Domestic violence screening practices of obstetrician-gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:785–9. 675. Ortiz J, Ford L. Existence of staff barriers to partner violence screening and screening practices in military prenatal settings. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2005;34:63–9. 676. Ferris LE. Canadian family physicians’ and general practitioners’ perceptions of their effectiveness in identifying and treating wife abuse. Med Care 1994;32:1163–72. 677. Janssen PA, Landolt MA, Grunfeld AF. Assessing for domestic violence exposure in primary care settings – the transition from classroom to clinical practice. J Interpers Violence 2003;18:623–33. 678. Lanzilotti SS, Jones P, Dai J, Bentzien V. EMS & the domestic violence patient: a report card of existing policy, protocol & training. J Emerg Med Serv 1999;24:58–66. 679. Williams JM, Chinnis AC, Gutman D. Health promotion practices of emergency physicians. Am J Emerg Med 2000;18:17–21. 680. Tower L. Barriers in screening women for domestic violence: a survey of social workers, family practitioners, and obstetrician-gynecologists. J Fam Violence 2006;21:245–57. 681. Chamberlain L, Perham-Hester KA. Physicians’ screening practices for female partner abuse during prenatal visits. Matern Child Health J 2000;4:141–8. 682. Guedes A, Bott S, Cuca Y. Integrating systematic screening for gender-based violence into sexual and reproductive health services: results of a baseline study by the International Planned Parenthood Federation, Western Hemisphere Region. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2002;78(Suppl. 1):S57–63. 683. Ahmed AM, Abdella ME, Yousif E, Elmardi AE. Response of Sudanese doctors to domestic violence. Saudi Med J 2003;24:1077–80. © 2009 Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO. All rights reserved. 684. Smith PH, Danis M, Helmick L. Changing the health care response to battered women: a health education approach. Fam Commun Health 1998;20:1–18. 685. Derk S. Rural health-care providers’ attitudes, practices, and training experiences regarding intimate partner violence – West Virginia 1997. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report 1998;47:670–3. 686. Borowsky IS, Ireland M. National survey of pediatrician’s violence prevention. Arch Pediatr Adolec Med 1999;153:1170–6. 687. Garimella R, Plichta SB, Houseman C, Garzon L. How physicians feel about assisting female victims of intimate-partner violence. Acad Med 2002;77:1262–5. 688. Pakieser RA, Lenaghan PA, Muelleman RL. Battered women: where they go for help. J Emerg Nurs 1998;24:16–19. 689. Bacigalupe G. Family violence in Chile: exploring prevalence and clinical dimensions. J Fam Psychother 2000;11:39–57. 690. Tilden VP. Response of the health care delivery system to battered women. Issues Ment Health Nurs 1989;10:309–20. 691. Weiss SJ, Ernst AA, Blanton D, Sewell D, Nick TG. EMT domestic violence knowledge and the results of an educational intervention. Am J Emerg Med 2000;18:168–71. 692. Sugg NK, Inui T. Primary care physicians’ response to domestic violence. Opening Pandora’s box. JAMA 1992;267:3157–60. 693. Tudiver F, Permaul-Woods JA. Physicians’ perceptions of and approaches to woman abuse. Can Fam Physician 1996;42:1475–80. 694. Melvin SY. Domestic violence: the physician’s role [see comment]. Hosp Pract (Minneap) 1995;30:45– 52; discussion 52–3. 695. Chescheir N. Violence against women: response from clinicians. Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:766–8. 696. Limandri BJ, Tilden VP. Nurses’ reasoning in the assessment of family violence. Image J Nurs Sch 1996;28:247–52. 697. Director TD, Linden JA. Domestic violence: an approach to identification and intervention. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2004;22:1117–32. 698. Chez R. Woman battering. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:1–4. 107
Page 1 and 2:
How far does screening women for do
Page 3 and 4:
How far does screening women for do
Page 5 and 6:
DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Techno
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11:
Page 14 and 15:
xii Executive summary and quantitat
Page 17 and 18:
Aims of the review This review has
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43:
Page 46 and 47:
30 Review Question II tools were us
Page 48 and 49:
32 Review Question II of controllin
Page 50 and 51:
34 Review Question II Table 6 Ranke
Page 52 and 53:
36 Review Question II Methodologica
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61:
Page 64 and 65:
48 Review Question IV access resour
Page 66 and 67:
50 Review Question IV woman’s nee
Page 68 and 69:
52 Review Question IV cognitive the
Page 70 and 71:
54 Review Question IV developing a
Page 72 and 73: 56 Review Question IV Sullivan and
Page 74 and 75: 58 Review Question IV the potential
Page 76 and 77: 60 Review Question V primary care c
Page 78 and 79: 62 Review Question V include incomp
Page 80 and 81: 64 Review Question VI preferred inc
Page 82 and 83: 66 Review Question VI Barnett 188 s
Page 84 and 85: 68 Review Question VI Discussion Th
Page 86 and 87: 70 Review Question VII would also b
Page 88 and 89: 72 Review Question VII transition p
Page 90 and 91: 74 Conclusions and implications for
Page 92 and 93: 76 Conclusions and implications for
Page 95: DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Techno
Page 98 and 99: 82 References project: details and
Page 100 and 101: 84 References of a managed care org
Page 102 and 103: 86 References 126. Sullivan CM, Byb
Page 104 and 105: 88 References 175. Edin KE, Högber
Page 106 and 107: 90 References 226. Parker B, McFarl
Page 108 and 109: 92 References report from the Briti
Page 110 and 111: 94 References 328. Campbell DW, Cam
Page 112 and 113: 96 References 381. Kramer A, Lorenz
Page 114 and 115: 98 References violence. J Obstet Gy
Page 116 and 117: 100 References to the mental health
Page 118 and 119: 102 References 541. Groves B. Menta
Page 120 and 121: 104 References residents about dome
Page 124 and 125: 108 References 699. Jones RF III. D
Page 126 and 127: 110 References 752. Zachary MJ, Sch
Page 128 and 129: 112 References 811. Rickert VI, Vau
Page 131 and 132: DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Techno
Page 153: This version of the monograph does
show all

How far does screening women for domestic (partner) - NIHR Health ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?