How far does screening women for domestic (partner) - NIHR Health ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Review methods 10 Table 2 Exclusion criteria for primary studies ordered by review questions Review questions a QI QII QIII QIV QV QVI QVII Exclusion criteria Participants Female survivors of partner violence aged under 15 years × × × Female survivors of other (non-partner) abuse (e.g. stranger rape, adult survivors of child abuse, elder abuse) × × × Male survivors of partner abuse of any age Children of abused women, abused children, and the perpetrators of abuse × × Participants with no previous history of partner violence × × × × Settings Studies conducted in non-health-care settings that are not considered relevant to health-care policy Study designs Single case studies Study aims excluded Interventions targeted at perpetrators of partner violence Studies reporting joint treatments, such as couple and family therapy (even if the therapy was administered separately to women) Interventions aimed at helping the survivors of child or elder abuse Intervention studies initiated to help the survivors of abuse committed by other family members (such as in-laws) Interventions targeted directly at helping children of women being abused by intimate partners Interventions aimed at abused men Studies determining the acceptability of screening that have not distinguished the perspectives of male and female × × × × × members of the public Community and societal interventions conducted with the aim of increasing public awareness of the problem of partner × × × abuse Criminal justice interventions
DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Technology Assessment 2009; Vol. 13: No. 16 Review questions a QI QII QIII QIV QV QVI QVII Exclusion criteria Excluded outcomes Studies that do not report outcomes relating to abuse Studies that do not report outcomes relating to at least one of: physical and psychosocial health, socioeconomic indicators × × × and other proxy measures Primary studies that only measure change in knowledge or attitudes of professionals about partner abuse × × Studies that only measure identification of abused women or documentation or safety assessments × × × © 2009 Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO. All rights reserved. Excluded reporting formats Self-published research reports PhD theses, masters’ and undergraduate dissertations Papers published in non-European languages Conference abstracts Reviews, before 1990, on the health impact of partner violence × × × × × × Prevalence data for partner violence from the UK reported before 1995 × × × × × × = exclusion criterion; × = not an exclusion criterion. a See footnote a in Table 1. 11
Page 1 and 2: How far does screening women for do
Page 3 and 4: How far does screening women for do
Page 5 and 6: DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Techno
Page 11: DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Techno
Page 14 and 15: xii Executive summary and quantitat
Page 17 and 18: Aims of the review This review has
Page 46 and 47: 30 Review Question II tools were us
Page 48 and 49: 32 Review Question II of controllin
Page 50 and 51: 34 Review Question II Table 6 Ranke
Page 52 and 53: 36 Review Question II Methodologica
Page 64 and 65: 48 Review Question IV access resour
Page 66 and 67: 50 Review Question IV woman’s nee
Page 68 and 69: 52 Review Question IV cognitive the
Page 70 and 71: 54 Review Question IV developing a
Page 72 and 73: 56 Review Question IV Sullivan and
Page 74 and 75: 58 Review Question IV the potential
Page 76 and 77:
60 Review Question V primary care c
Page 78 and 79:
62 Review Question V include incomp
Page 80 and 81:
64 Review Question VI preferred inc
Page 82 and 83:
66 Review Question VI Barnett 188 s
Page 84 and 85:
68 Review Question VI Discussion Th
Page 86 and 87:
70 Review Question VII would also b
Page 88 and 89:
72 Review Question VII transition p
Page 90 and 91:
74 Conclusions and implications for
Page 92 and 93:
76 Conclusions and implications for
Page 95:
DOI: 10.3310/hta13160 Health Techno
Page 98 and 99:
82 References project: details and
Page 100 and 101:
84 References of a managed care org
Page 102 and 103:
86 References 126. Sullivan CM, Byb
Page 104 and 105:
88 References 175. Edin KE, Högber
Page 106 and 107:
90 References 226. Parker B, McFarl
Page 108 and 109:
92 References report from the Briti
Page 110 and 111:
94 References 328. Campbell DW, Cam
Page 112 and 113:
96 References 381. Kramer A, Lorenz
Page 114 and 115:
98 References violence. J Obstet Gy
Page 116 and 117:
100 References to the mental health
Page 118 and 119:
102 References 541. Groves B. Menta
Page 120 and 121:
104 References residents about dome
Page 122 and 123:
106 References 645. Harris JM, Kuto
Page 124 and 125:
108 References 699. Jones RF III. D
Page 126 and 127:
110 References 752. Zachary MJ, Sch
Page 128 and 129:
112 References 811. Rickert VI, Vau
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153:
This version of the monograph does
show all

How far does screening women for domestic (partner) - NIHR Health ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?