25.09.2013 Views

Birds in southern Öresund in relation to the wind farm at ... - Vattenfall

Birds in southern Öresund in relation to the wind farm at ... - Vattenfall

Birds in southern Öresund in relation to the wind farm at ... - Vattenfall

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fig. 24. Summary distribution maps for <strong>the</strong> Eider Som<strong>at</strong>eria mollissima from bo<strong>at</strong> surveys<br />

pre- (left) and post- (right) construction of <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong>. For annual maps see appendix.<br />

Sammanf<strong>at</strong>tande utbredn<strong>in</strong>gskar<strong>to</strong>r för ejder Som<strong>at</strong>eria mollissima från båt<strong>in</strong>venter<strong>in</strong>gar före<br />

(vänster) och efter (höger) uppförandet av v<strong>in</strong>dkraftparken. För årsvisa kar<strong>to</strong>r se appendix.<br />

Overall Jacob’s <strong>in</strong>dices for <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> area and <strong>the</strong> 2 km buffer zone show somewh<strong>at</strong><br />

different results compared <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> density analysis above (Table 3). The aerial survey d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

show more or less unchanged D-values from <strong>the</strong> pre- and post construction period <strong>in</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal<br />

(0.06 and 0.08 for <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> area, 0.79 and 0.69 for <strong>the</strong> buffer zone respectively)<br />

<strong>in</strong>dic<strong>at</strong><strong>in</strong>g th<strong>at</strong> irrespective of <strong>the</strong> presence of <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Eiders used <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong><br />

area as expected and preferred <strong>the</strong> buffer zone. The bo<strong>at</strong> survey d<strong>at</strong>a however <strong>in</strong>dic<strong>at</strong>ed a<br />

similar p<strong>at</strong>tern as <strong>the</strong> density analysis with preference for <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> area dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> preconstruction<br />

period chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> expected use with <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> <strong>in</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion (D = 0.80 pre,<br />

-0.09 post). The overall change was <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same direction for <strong>the</strong> buffer zone where preference<br />

changes <strong>to</strong> more or less expected use (D = 0.68 pre, 0.11 post).<br />

Explan<strong>at</strong>ions for <strong>the</strong>se unclear, and <strong>in</strong> <strong>rel<strong>at</strong>ion</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> density analysis above conflict<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

results can be found <strong>in</strong> a more detailed look <strong>at</strong> Jacob’s <strong>in</strong>dices from <strong>the</strong> different years<br />

separ<strong>at</strong>ely (Fig. 26). Apparently <strong>the</strong>re was a clear avoidance of <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> area dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

first years with <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> <strong>in</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion (low <strong>in</strong>dices 2007-2009) while <strong>the</strong> area was<br />

preferred (aerial survey d<strong>at</strong>a) or used as expected (bo<strong>at</strong> survey d<strong>at</strong>a) <strong>in</strong> 2011. This could be a<br />

sign of habitu<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> presence of <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> although o<strong>the</strong>rs fac<strong>to</strong>rs, such as changes<br />

<strong>in</strong> food availability, can be <strong>in</strong>volved as well.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dic<strong>at</strong>ions of habitu<strong>at</strong>ion of Eiders <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> was th<strong>at</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g aerial<br />

survey <strong>in</strong> 2011 flocks of a few hundred Eiders were found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> but outside <strong>the</strong><br />

survey belt and hence not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> any of <strong>the</strong> figures above. This was <strong>the</strong> first observ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

of larger flocks <strong>in</strong>side <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g oper<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!