25.09.2013 Views

Birds in southern Öresund in relation to the wind farm at ... - Vattenfall

Birds in southern Öresund in relation to the wind farm at ... - Vattenfall

Birds in southern Öresund in relation to the wind farm at ... - Vattenfall

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

<strong>Birds</strong>/km 2<br />

Mergus serra<strong>to</strong>r<br />

W<strong>in</strong>ter<br />

2006(3) 2008(1) 2009(4) 2010(1) 2011(3)<br />

52<br />

Outer<br />

Buffer<br />

W<strong>in</strong>d<strong>farm</strong><br />

Fig. 32. Densities (<strong>in</strong>dividuals / km 2 ) of Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serra<strong>to</strong>r based on<br />

aerial surveys dur<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>ter <strong>in</strong> different zones around <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> <strong>at</strong> Lillgrund <strong>in</strong> different<br />

years. Number of surveys <strong>in</strong> brackets.<br />

Tä<strong>the</strong>t (<strong>in</strong>divider/km 2 ) av småskrake Mergus serra<strong>to</strong>r under v<strong>in</strong>tern <strong>in</strong>om olika zoner runt<br />

Lillgrunds v<strong>in</strong>dkraftpark under olika år baserade på flyg<strong>in</strong>venter<strong>in</strong>garna. Antalet<br />

<strong>in</strong>venter<strong>in</strong>gar <strong>in</strong>om parentes.<br />

Overall Jacob’s <strong>in</strong>dices showed qualit<strong>at</strong>ively a general decrease <strong>in</strong> preference for both <strong>the</strong><br />

w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> area and <strong>the</strong> buffer zone between pre- and post-construction periods (Table 4).<br />

D<strong>at</strong>a from <strong>the</strong> aerial surveys showed a weak avoidance already before <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> was<br />

constructed (D = -0.26) and a somewh<strong>at</strong> stronger avoidance with <strong>the</strong> <strong>farm</strong> <strong>in</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion (D =<br />

-0.42). Bo<strong>at</strong> survey d<strong>at</strong>a showed a change from preference (D = 0.41) <strong>to</strong> weak avoidance (D =<br />

-0.27). For <strong>the</strong> buffer zone <strong>the</strong> changes were <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same direction, from preference (D = 0.22<br />

and 0.47) <strong>to</strong> expected use (D = 0.07 and 0.03).<br />

A separ<strong>at</strong>ion of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dices for different years gives a less clear picture as <strong>the</strong> two survey<br />

methods yield <strong>at</strong> least partly different results (Fig. 32). The bo<strong>at</strong> survey d<strong>at</strong>a clearly <strong>in</strong>dic<strong>at</strong>es<br />

change from preference for both <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> area and <strong>the</strong> buffer zone dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> preconstruction<br />

period <strong>to</strong>, ma<strong>in</strong>ly, avoidance for both parts with <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> <strong>in</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion. The<br />

aerial survey d<strong>at</strong>a show elements of <strong>the</strong> same s<strong>to</strong>ry for <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> area <strong>in</strong> some postconstruction<br />

years but not <strong>in</strong> all. Accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> this d<strong>at</strong>a set <strong>the</strong> buffer zone is used as expected<br />

or weakly preferred <strong>in</strong> most years. No direct <strong>in</strong>dic<strong>at</strong>ions of habitu<strong>at</strong>ion is given by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dices,<br />

<strong>in</strong>stead vari<strong>at</strong>ion between years <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution of birds seem <strong>to</strong> be large.<br />

We conclude th<strong>at</strong> we can not see any major impact from <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong> on <strong>the</strong> occurrence of<br />

Red-breasted Mergansers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area. Instead of just avoid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>farm</strong>, numbers have<br />

been lower <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole study area <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> post- compared <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> pre-construction years. Such

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!