05.10.2013 Views

PAUL AND THE RHETORIC OF REVERSAL: KERYGMATIC ...

PAUL AND THE RHETORIC OF REVERSAL: KERYGMATIC ...

PAUL AND THE RHETORIC OF REVERSAL: KERYGMATIC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

With Ciampa, Rosner suggests that somehow the section as a whole (indeed all of 4:18-<br />

7:40) is about the problem of sexual immorality; and that the section on lawsuits<br />

represents a (digressionary?) exploration of the related problem of greed. 130 This<br />

perspective is shared by Hall. 131<br />

In favour of seeing an overall unity to the themes of chapters 5–6 is the fact that the theme<br />

of “judging”, which is prominent in 5:1-13 (where the congregation is called to exercise<br />

appropriate judgement in relation to the individual case of sexual immorality) continues<br />

into the section on lawsuits (where the Christian community is called to exercise<br />

competent judgement). Indeed, Thiselton observes that the target of Paul’s accusation in<br />

chapter 5 is the Corinthian church for its pride, rather than the particular man for his sin. 132<br />

This problem of Corinthian pride then appears to lie behind the subsequent problem of<br />

lawsuits (cf. Paul’s retort: “I say this to shame you”) and the ensuing discussion of sexual<br />

immorality (cf. the Corinthian slogan: “Everything is lawful for me!”). So each section of<br />

chapters 5–6 appears to involve the repudiation of Corinthian pride:<br />

5:1-13: Repudiation of Corinthian pride in an act of sexual immorality that has brought<br />

impurity to the community<br />

6:1-11: Repudiation of Corinthian pride in greedily making unjust gain at each other’s<br />

expense<br />

6:12-20: Repudiation of Corinthian pride in (probably feast-related) sexual indulgence<br />

I suggested earlier that Paul counters the problem of proud, present-obsessed human<br />

autonomy in Corinth with the message of the cross of Christ in chapters 1–4; a corrective<br />

which he then applies ethically in chapters 5–14, following an observable movement of<br />

Pauline moral argumentation from sexual immorality, greed, and impurity of bodies to<br />

mutuality and love within the body of Christ.<br />

130 Ciampa and Rosner, “Structure and Argument”.<br />

131 Hall, Unity, 36, note 21.<br />

132 Anthony C. Thiselton, “The Meaning of Sarx in 1 Corinthians 5:5: A Fresh Approach<br />

in the Light of Logical and Semantic Factors,” SJT 26 (1973): 204-27. See also<br />

Chrysostom, who notes that the congregation is at fault for boasting in this person, who<br />

may be one of the “wise” of the congregation: Homily 15 on 1 Corinthians; PG 61.122.<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!