05.10.2013 Views

PAUL AND THE RHETORIC OF REVERSAL: KERYGMATIC ...

PAUL AND THE RHETORIC OF REVERSAL: KERYGMATIC ...

PAUL AND THE RHETORIC OF REVERSAL: KERYGMATIC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in early Christian interpretation of Jesus. I suggest that this was a viable rhetorical<br />

resource for Paul in the construction of 1 Corinthians. Paul is summoning those who are<br />

effectively playing the role of the boastful ruler (who will be destroyed) to rather take the<br />

role of the cruciform sufferer (who will be vindicated).<br />

In chapter 2 I step back to situate my interpretation within recent scholarship on the letter.<br />

I investigate arguments against the compositional unity of the letter and survey different<br />

models of the letter’s coherence. I go on to consider the exegetical tensions that have<br />

provoked such a variety of perspectives on the letter’s unity and coherence.<br />

In chapter 3 I focus on 1 Corinthians 1–4. I consider the Corinthian “problems”<br />

introduced in this section, and find John Chrysostom to be a valuable model in giving<br />

consideration both to the social and historical background of the issues as well as Paul’s<br />

pastoral evaluation of those issues. In terms of background, I concur with Chrysostom<br />

that the problems arise from a situation in which godly leaders were being undermined<br />

and pushed aside as a result of the believers’ preference for polished orators. In terms of<br />

pastoral evaluation, I agree with Chrysostom that this situation represents boastful,<br />

present-obsessed human autonomy, as the believers attach their status to humans rather<br />

than to Christ. This pastorally conceived problem, I suggest, is precisely the sort of issue<br />

penetratingly addressed by the motif of reversal in other examples of Jewish/Christian<br />

literature.<br />

In chapter 4 I examine 1 Corinthians 5–14 and suggest that the topics of these chapters<br />

follow an observable pattern of Pauline ethics. I compare ethical sections within the<br />

Pauline Corpus and find that they generally proceed from a corrective to passionate desire<br />

for bodily taboos (especially sexual immorality, greed and impurity) to a commendation of<br />

inter-personal service and love within the body of Christ. I investigate possible<br />

backgrounds to this progression of issues, and suggest that it echoes Jewish encapsulations<br />

of the themes of the Torah in the Hellenistic-Roman period. For Paul, however, this<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!