27.10.2013 Views

Technologies for intensification in SW Uganda ... - Foodnet - cgiar

Technologies for intensification in SW Uganda ... - Foodnet - cgiar

Technologies for intensification in SW Uganda ... - Foodnet - cgiar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

o Land fragmentation<br />

Fragmentation, or the scatter<strong>in</strong>g of plots with<strong>in</strong> a household, is a common feature of land hold<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>in</strong> Kisoro, Kabale and Rukungiri Districts. It also occurs to a much lesser degree <strong>in</strong> the highlands<br />

of Kasese where households may farm one plot near their home, one <strong>in</strong> the higher elevations (e.g.<br />

<strong>for</strong> passion fruit) and one <strong>in</strong> the lowland (e.g. rented <strong>for</strong> cotton or maize). In Kabale, Kisoro, and<br />

Rukungiri, farmers may operate an average of 8-10 dist<strong>in</strong>ct plots of land, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the area.<br />

While farmers do seek plots <strong>in</strong> different topographical locations, the degree to which<br />

fragmentation appears on the landscape is deemed excessive by most of them (Place, 1995).<br />

These plots are scattered <strong>in</strong> many directions and the majority are not usually visible from the<br />

homestead (Place, 1995). A good portion of the plots is located over an hour’s walk from the<br />

home and <strong>in</strong>centives to manage such plots are low. Fragmentation has been found to be an<br />

important factor <strong>in</strong> observed abandonment of land areas <strong>in</strong> Kabale District (Bamwer<strong>in</strong>de and<br />

Place, 2000). This highly disjunctive pattern of land ownership makes concerted soil<br />

conservation and management ef<strong>for</strong>ts exceed<strong>in</strong>gly difficult. In addition to fragmentation, the<br />

small size of plots tends to reduce <strong>in</strong>centives <strong>for</strong> mixed farm<strong>in</strong>g or <strong>in</strong>tegrated crop-organic <strong>in</strong>put<br />

systems, as farmers prefer not to reduce land area under priority crops. Household rights over<br />

land are very strong with almost all plots be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>herited or purchased. A m<strong>in</strong>ority of the plots is<br />

rented out seasonally. Women’s land rights are <strong>in</strong>ferior to those of men, and this does have an<br />

impact on women’s participation <strong>in</strong> longer-term decision mak<strong>in</strong>g such as tree plant<strong>in</strong>g (Place,<br />

1995).<br />

2.3.2 Markets and prices<br />

With very few exceptions all farmers sell some of their products and are l<strong>in</strong>ked to markets.<br />

Particularly <strong>in</strong> Bushenyi District, a common statement was that farmers are able to produce a wide<br />

range of commodities but are limited by market access. Below are some of the ma<strong>in</strong> observations:<br />

o Low and fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g prices<br />

We were not able to visit large parts of the districts to exam<strong>in</strong>e how farmgate prices varied across<br />

the southwest. Instead, we relied on prices collected at selected markets by <strong>Foodnet</strong>, other<br />

secondary sources, and a few validation exercises with key <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mants. Prices <strong>for</strong> most major<br />

commodities vary both spatially and temporally. This is demonstrated <strong>in</strong> Figures 2.5 thru 2.7.<br />

Figure 2.5 shows a typical pattern of price seasonality, us<strong>in</strong>g Kasese as an example. For nearly all<br />

major commodities, prices have a s<strong>in</strong>gle peak period, around January to February and then beg<strong>in</strong> a<br />

slow but eventually profound fall <strong>in</strong> price. Because many prices move together, this implies that<br />

Kasese markets are poorly <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to regional or national markets <strong>in</strong> general. It also suggests<br />

that there are few ga<strong>in</strong>s to be made by farmers through selection of alternative crop mixes. It is<br />

likely that seasonality of price changes is less severe <strong>in</strong> other places better connected to markets,<br />

but we did not have comprehensive data on this.<br />

Instead, we were able to f<strong>in</strong>d (aga<strong>in</strong> through <strong>Foodnet</strong>) price data <strong>for</strong> selected commodities <strong>in</strong> 3<br />

market centres, Mbarara, Kasese, and Kabale. Mbarara, like Bushenyi, is a major producer of<br />

matoke. As can be seen, matoke prices are generally much lower and less variable <strong>in</strong> Mbarara<br />

than <strong>in</strong> the other two district sites, which are net importers of matoke. In contrast, maize prices<br />

move <strong>in</strong> the same manner, with some seasonal variation, <strong>in</strong> all 3 locations. It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g that a<br />

maize produc<strong>in</strong>g area (the lower elevation areas <strong>in</strong> Kasese District) faces similar price levels and<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!