27.10.2013 Views

Technologies for intensification in SW Uganda ... - Foodnet - cgiar

Technologies for intensification in SW Uganda ... - Foodnet - cgiar

Technologies for intensification in SW Uganda ... - Foodnet - cgiar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Description<br />

Technology Environmental concerns Livelihood impact Equity Institutional Recommendation Sum<br />

Status *<br />

(not part of<br />

sum scores)<br />

Soil impact ** Diversity ** Yield<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease **<br />

Income<br />

**<br />

Feasibility<br />

***<br />

Concerns<br />

****<br />

Requirements<br />

Doma<strong>in</strong> of<br />

Scores<br />

1. Matooke Positive with<br />

good managem.<br />

Few suitable<br />

imp. Varieties<br />

Very high Low (not<br />

marketable)<br />

Moderate (more<br />

particip. R&D)<br />

Balanced High > 1700 m.a.s.l.<br />

Score impr. cv. 2 5 2 6 2 3 5 2 25<br />

Score local cv. 6 5 6 3 5 6 5 4 34<br />

2. Coffee<br />

Positive with Few varieties High High High Income often Moderate > 1500 m.a.s.l.<br />

(arabica)<br />

good managem.<br />

controlled by men<br />

Score 4 5 2 5 5 5 2 3 27<br />

3. Coffee<br />

Positive with Few varieties High High High Income often Moderate < 1500 m.a.s.l.<br />

(robusta)<br />

good managem.<br />

controlled by men<br />

Score 6 5 2 5 5 5 2 3 27<br />

4. Tea Very positive with<br />

good managem.<br />

Moderate High High &<br />

regular<br />

Moderate Income often<br />

controlled by men<br />

High > 1500 m.a.s.l<br />

Score 5 6 3 5 6 4 2 2 28<br />

5. Cassava Negative<br />

(without <strong>in</strong>puts)<br />

Many new<br />

varieties<br />

Very high Moderate<br />

unless<br />

processed<br />

High Ma<strong>in</strong>ly a food crop Moderate < 1800 m.a.s.l.<br />

Score 4 2 6 6 3 5 4 3 29<br />

6. Citrus Positive with Few suitable Particularly High Moderate due to Income often Very high < 1600 m.a.s.l.<br />

good managem. cultivars quality<br />

improv.<br />

disease issue controlled by men<br />

Score 3 5 2 4 5 4 2 1 23<br />

7. Avocado Positive with Many new Very high Moderate High Income often Moderate All<br />

good managem. varieties<br />

controlled by men<br />

Score 5 5 6 6 3 5 2 3 30<br />

8. Apples Positive with Many new New crop High Moderate Income often<br />

High > 1500 m.a.s.l<br />

good managem. varieties High yields<br />

controlled by men<br />

Score 3 5 6 5 5 4 2 2 29<br />

9. Pears Positive with Many new New crop High but Moderate Income often<br />

High > 2000 m.a.s.l.<br />

good managem. varieties High yields less certa<strong>in</strong><br />

controlled by men<br />

Score 3 5 6 5 4 4 2 2 28<br />

10. Plums Positive with Many new New crop High Moderate Income often<br />

High > 2000 m.a.s.l.<br />

good managem. varieties High yields<br />

controlled by men<br />

Score 2 5 6 5 5 4 2 2 29<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!