Technologies for intensification in SW Uganda ... - Foodnet - cgiar
Technologies for intensification in SW Uganda ... - Foodnet - cgiar
Technologies for intensification in SW Uganda ... - Foodnet - cgiar
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 4.2: Annual crops <strong>in</strong> <strong>SW</strong> <strong>Uganda</strong><br />
Crops Suitable Status* Impact ** on Recommendation doma<strong>in</strong><br />
technologies <strong>in</strong> <strong>SW</strong> Produc- Environ- Welfare Geographic*** Socio-econ.<br />
tivity ment<br />
7 local varieties<br />
9 improved var.<br />
Bush beans<br />
Management<br />
recommendations<br />
6<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
3<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
20, 21, 31,32,33<br />
Subs. & comm.<br />
farmers<br />
Climb<strong>in</strong>g<br />
beans<br />
4 varieties<br />
Management<br />
recommendations<br />
4<br />
4<br />
6<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
20, 31,32,33<br />
Subs. & comm.<br />
farmers<br />
Maize<br />
5 open poll<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
4 hybrid varieties<br />
Management<br />
recommendations<br />
3<br />
3<br />
4<br />
6<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
4<br />
20, 21, 31,32,33<br />
Subs. & comm.<br />
farmers<br />
Comm.. farmers<br />
Sweet<br />
potato<br />
12 imp. Varieties<br />
Management<br />
recommendations<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
20, 21, 31,32,33 Subs. farmers<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ger<br />
Millet<br />
4 imp. varieties<br />
Management<br />
Recommendations<br />
1<br />
1<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
20, 21, 31,32,33 Subs. farmers<br />
Sorghum Management<br />
recommendations<br />
Local varieties<br />
10 imp. varieties<br />
Irish potato<br />
Management<br />
recommendations<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
6<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
3 imp. varieties<br />
Groundnuts Management<br />
recommendations<br />
3 3 3 3<br />
Rice<br />
3 upland, 1<br />
lowland imp. Var<br />
Management<br />
recommendations<br />
2<br />
2<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
4<br />
Local 6 2 4 4<br />
Field Peas Management<br />
recommendations<br />
3 imp. Varieties 3 5 4 4<br />
Wheat Management<br />
recommendations<br />
2 3 3 2<br />
2 imp. varieties 6 6 4 5<br />
Cotton Management<br />
recommendations<br />
5 6 4 5<br />
- - - - -<br />
Tobacco Management<br />
recommendations<br />
6 5 2 5<br />
Pyrethrum<br />
An assortment<br />
raised thru seed<br />
Management<br />
recommendations<br />
-<br />
4<br />
-<br />
4<br />
-<br />
4<br />
-<br />
5<br />
Vegetables<br />
Indigenous &<br />
temperate<br />
Management<br />
recommendations<br />
6<br />
6<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
21, 31,32,33<br />
21, 31,32,33<br />
> 1500 m.a.s.l.<br />
20,30,31<br />
< 1500 m.a.s.l<br />
Subs. & comm.<br />
farmers<br />
Subs. & comm.<br />
farmers<br />
20 Subs. Farmers<br />
21,32,33<br />
> 1500 m.a.s.l<br />
21,32,33<br />
> 1500 m.a.s.l.<br />
20,30,31<br />
< 1500 m.a.s.l<br />
21,32,33<br />
> 1500 m.a.s.l<br />
20, 30, 32, 33<br />
> 1800 m.a.s.l.<br />
all<br />
Subs. & comm.<br />
farmers<br />
Subs. & comm.<br />
farmers<br />
Subs. & comm.<br />
Farmers<br />
Subs. & comm.<br />
Farmers<br />
Subs. & comm.<br />
farmers<br />
Subs. & comm.<br />
farmers<br />
* Score: 1: on-station 2: on-farm test<strong>in</strong>g 3: pilot location 4: <strong>in</strong>itial dissem<strong>in</strong>ation 5: widely dissem<strong>in</strong>ated 6: common option <strong>for</strong> farmers<br />
** Score: 1: very negative; 2: negative, 3: neutral; 4: moderately positive, 5: positive; 6: very positive<br />
*** Farm<strong>in</strong>g Systems (see: 2), areas pr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> bold are particularly suitable<br />
35