30.10.2013 Views

European Human Genetics Conference 2007 June 16 – 19, 2007 ...

European Human Genetics Conference 2007 June 16 – 19, 2007 ...

European Human Genetics Conference 2007 June 16 – 19, 2007 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Prenatal diagnosis<br />

between prenatally diagnosed trisomy 21 incidences with the indications<br />

throughout 7 years.<br />

The indications of the women who underwent cytogenetic prenatal<br />

analysis including amniocentesis (9737), chorionic villus sampling (95)<br />

and fetal blood sampling (229) were evaluated. The mean maternal<br />

age was 34.70±6.02 years and the mean gestation week was 17±3.85.<br />

Advanced maternal age was the most common indication (48.6%) in<br />

all prenatally diagnosed DS cases which is followed by abnormal ultrasound<br />

findings (18.6%) and increased maternal serum screening<br />

in triple test results (18.6%). Trisomy 21 was detected in a total of 70<br />

cases. Chromosome analysis revealed 33 cases with 47,XY,+21; 32<br />

cases with 47,XX,+21; 2 cases with 47,XX,+21,inv(9)(p11;q13), one<br />

with mosaic DS 47,XY,+21/48,XY,+3,+21, one with 46,XY,t(13;15)(q12<br />

;p11),+21 and one 46,XX,t(14;21).The distribution of the number of DS<br />

cases according to the advancing years were: 3/515 (0.003%) in 2000,<br />

5/717 (0,697%) in 2001, 7/836 (0.837%) in 2002, 8/1285 (0.622%) in<br />

2003, 21/1474 (1.424%) in 2004, 13/13<strong>16</strong> (0.987%) in 2005, 13/1315<br />

(0.988%) in 2006.<br />

The mothers less than 35 years old who had a fetus with DS covered<br />

47.8% of the cases, nevertheless, when the age lowered to 30 years,<br />

the ratio became 80.6%. The risk of having a child with DS increased<br />

in a gradual, linear fashion until 30 years old and showed a significant<br />

increase thereafter.<br />

P0449. Down’s syndrome screening in Saint-Petersburg. Ten<br />

years experience (<strong>19</strong>97-2006).<br />

T. K. Kascheeva 1 , Y. A. Nikolaeva 1 , N. V. Vokhmyanina 2 , T. V. Kuznetzova 1 , O.<br />

P. Romanenko 2 , V. S. Baranov 1 ;<br />

1 Ott’s Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology RAMS, Saint-Petersburg, Russian<br />

Federation, 2 City Medical Genetic Center, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.<br />

Trisomy 21 or Down’s syndrome is one of the most common genetic<br />

abnormalities with its risk progressively increase with maternal age.<br />

In many countries biochemical screening programs have been implemented,<br />

and the risk of Down’s syndrome is calculated for each pregnancy.<br />

Total biochemical screening for Down’s syndrome in Saint-Petersburg<br />

has been carried out in the second trimester of pregnancy<br />

since <strong>19</strong>97. Assessment of risk relies maternal age and serum markers<br />

(AFP and HCG) concentrations. Also all pregnant women were<br />

subjected to ultrasound examinations on the 10-14 & 20-22 weeks of<br />

gestation and also for cytogenetic screening for chromosomal abnormalities.<br />

Basic results of screening programs for Down’s syndrome<br />

since <strong>19</strong>97 up to 2006 and some urgent problems in this area are outlined.<br />

Since <strong>19</strong>97 36,9% DS fetuses (<strong>19</strong>8/536) could be attributed to<br />

the women of 35 ages and more. Most of these cases - 61 % (102/<strong>16</strong>6)<br />

were detected prenatally. Efficiency of DS detection in this group increased<br />

from 28.9% in <strong>19</strong>97-98 up to 68% in 2004-06. About 18,7% of<br />

elder women rejected invasive PD for different reasons. Detection rate<br />

in 2-d trimester was 74,6% (cut off 1/360, FPR 6,8%). Since 2004 combined<br />

biochemical & US screening in the first trimester was initiated.<br />

Detection rate was 93.8% (30/32) (cut off 1/250, FPR 12.8%, average<br />

age 32.4+/-4.7). Pilot study of UE3 and inhibin A concentrations were<br />

performed for establishing of medians. Introducing of quadrotest will<br />

be useful for reducing of false positive results for the patients tested in<br />

the 2-d trimester.<br />

P0450. Further results evaluation for the women with increased<br />

risk for congenital anomalies of fetus after biochemical prenatal<br />

diagnostic (PRISCA)<br />

R. Sereikiene, D. Serapinas, V. Asmoniene;<br />

Kaunas Medical University Hospital, Kaunas, Lithuania.<br />

PURPOSE: to evaluate real outcomes of pregnancy of women with<br />

increased risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities after I or II trimester<br />

biochemical examination more than age risk.<br />

METHODS AND RESULTS: Analyzing of medical documentation, contacts<br />

with women after birthing. The 371 women were examined by the<br />

PRISCA program during 2005.10.01-2006.10.01 year period. The risk<br />

factors were older age, not favorable anamnesis of pregnancy (congenital<br />

anomalies, miscarriages, sterilities and others), not favorable<br />

anamnesis of family or relatives. First trimester “double” test (PAPP-A<br />

+ β-hCG) was done for 103 women, second trimester “triple” test was<br />

done for 268 and all two tests - for 24 women.<br />

The increase risk for Downy and Edwards syndromes was got in 91<br />

(24,5%) cases, according first trimester test - for 26, second - 63, two<br />

this - 12 women. The amniocentesis was offered in case when risk<br />

was higher 1:100 for women younger 40 years old and 1: 50 older 40<br />

years old. This procedure was done for 15 women and 3 trisomies of<br />

chromosome 21(3,3% of all women with increased risk) were found<br />

using FISH method in combination with full cariotype of fetus. In other<br />

74 cases of increased risk the further ultrasound examination was offered.<br />

CONCLUSION: The greet importance is to evaluate the health status<br />

of newborns after birth and all outcomes of pregnancy in cases of<br />

increased risk according biochemical examination. These dates will<br />

show in full text of this work.<br />

P0451. Prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 mosaicism with true<br />

chimerism<br />

C. Gug, G. Budau;<br />

University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Victor Babes”, Timisoara, Romania.<br />

The 32 year old female (gesta 1, para 0) had amniocentesis at 21<br />

weeks gestation due to: increased nuchal translucency at ultrasound<br />

scan (6 mm at 13 weeks of pregnancy), abnormal alpha-feto-protein<br />

in maternal serum (0,44 MoM) and chromosomal abnormality in family<br />

history (an uncle with Down Syndrome). Chromosome analysis of<br />

amniotic fluid cultures showed a mosaic karyotype: 47,XX+21/46,XY.<br />

The couple was counseled for prenatal diagnosis of the mosaicism: we<br />

explained the possibility that the anomalous cell line could involve fetal<br />

tissues. To exclude the possibility of contamination with maternal cells<br />

(having suspected that a mosaicism with a very low line with no phenotypical<br />

modifications existed), we performed maternal karyotype,<br />

which turned out to be normal. After such investigations, the couple<br />

elected to terminate the pregnancy. Cord blood cultures showed two<br />

cell-lines: a normal cell-line of 46,XY and a 47,XX+21 cell line. We<br />

propose that this case represents an example of true chimerism. The<br />

most plausible mechanism underlyind this phenomenon is that two<br />

embryos (1 normal, male, and one trisomic, female) have performed a<br />

fusion in early pregnancy.<br />

P0452. Introducing first trimester screening for chromosomal<br />

abnormalities in Estonia<br />

K. Muru1,2 , T. Reimand1 , M. Sitska1 ;<br />

1 2 Medical <strong>Genetics</strong> Center, Tartu University Clinics, Tartu, Estonia, Institute of<br />

General and Molecular Pathology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.<br />

Prenatal diagnosis of genetic disorders in Estonia has been offered<br />

since <strong>19</strong>90. Second trimester maternal serum screening was started in<br />

<strong>19</strong>98. In 2001 first trimester ultrasound screening (NT) was introduced<br />

in some centers. Since February 2005 the combined first trimester<br />

screening (serum screening+NT) is offered in Tartu University Clinics.<br />

Our study included 1275 women at the first trimester of pregnancy.<br />

In 10 +1 - 13 +6 week of pregnancy PAPP-A and free ß-HCG were measured.<br />

Eighty-five percent of women underwent the combined 1st trimester<br />

screening (NT + PAPP-A and free ß-HCG). For individual risk<br />

calculation we used Prisca 4.0 software (distributed by Siemens Medical<br />

Solutions Diagnostics). All women had also 2nd trimester routine<br />

ultrasound screening in <strong>19</strong>-20 week of pregnancy.<br />

First 500 women underwent also routine 2nd trimester serum screening.<br />

From the beginning of 2006 stepwise sequential screening was<br />

developed for 1st and 2nd trimester screening. Screening positive (risk<br />

for trisomy 21 of ≥1: 270 at term) were 10,2% of tests based only<br />

on biochemical markers and 4,6% of combined screening tests. Eight<br />

women fulfilled criteria (risk for DS >1:50 and NT >2,5 mm or NT >3,0<br />

mm) for early invasive diagnostics test (CVS). Chromosomal analysis<br />

(via CVS or AC) revealed 4 Down syndrome, 1 Edwards syndrome and<br />

1 triploidy (69,XXX). During study period were found 2 “false negative”<br />

Down syndrome cases. The essential criteria for using 1st trimester<br />

screening wider in Estonia is the feasibility to measure NT during 12-<br />

13. week of pregnancy, which is now possible only in few centers.<br />

P0453. Assessment of the Fragile X PCR assay in routine<br />

diagnostic practice<br />

Z. Musova, S. Bendova, K. Pavlikova, P. Hedvicakova, A. Krepelova;<br />

Department of Biology and Medical <strong>Genetics</strong>, Charles University - Faculty Hospital<br />

Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.<br />

Here we present our initial assessment of the Fragile X PCR kit (Abbott)<br />

in diagnostic practice. Sample genotype was determined using an<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!