30.10.2013 Views

European Human Genetics Conference 2007 June 16 – 19, 2007 ...

European Human Genetics Conference 2007 June 16 – 19, 2007 ...

European Human Genetics Conference 2007 June 16 – 19, 2007 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Genetic counselling, education, genetic services, and public policy 0<br />

For the scheme of 2006, results were submitted early <strong>2007</strong>. A comparison<br />

will be made between the two trials. Furthermore, the evaluation<br />

will determine if there is any improvement for laboratories who participated<br />

in the trial twice.<br />

P1379. Quality Management and accreditation of genetic testing<br />

services<br />

R. J. Hastings 1 , D. Barton 2 , S. Berwouts 3 , C. Brady 2 , P. Corbisier 4 , A. Corveleyn<br />

3 , R. Elles 5 , B. Fowler 6 , D. Gancberg 4 , P. Litynski 6 , M. Macek Jr 7 , U. Malburg<br />

8 , G. Matthijs 3 , M. Morris 9 , C. Mueller 8 , N. Nagels 3 , B. Quellhorst-Pawley 1 ,<br />

A. Stambergova 7 , J. Vermeesch 3 , K. Vickers 5 , E. Dequeker 3 ;<br />

1 John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2 Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital,<br />

Dublin, Ireland, 3 KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 4 <strong>European</strong> Commission,<br />

Geel, Belgium, 5 St. Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom, 6 University<br />

Children’s Hospital, Basel, Switzerland, 7 Charles University, Prague, Czech<br />

Republic, 8 Universitaet Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany, 9 CMU, Geneva,<br />

Switzerland.<br />

The EuroGentest network aims to improve and harmonize the quality<br />

of the genetic services in Europe. The network encompasses Biochemical,<br />

Clinical, Cyto- and Molecular <strong>Genetics</strong>. The EuroGentest<br />

Quality Management group is aiming to improve the organization and<br />

harmonization of External Quality Assessment (EQA) schemes, facilitate<br />

the development of guidelines and disseminate Quality assurance<br />

(QAu) information through a databaseas well as assisting laboratories<br />

in attaining and maintaining accreditation. In addition, this group<br />

is reviewing suitable quality control materials (QCMs) and providing<br />

documentation/SOPs on new technologies.<br />

Since January 2005, the group has disseminated information on accreditation<br />

through five international workshops. A database on the<br />

current status of QAu in <strong>European</strong> genetic testing services will soon<br />

be publicly available. On the website, laboratories can find the EQA<br />

scheme most appropriate to their needs through discipline specific<br />

registers of schemes in Europe. All three laboratory disciplines have<br />

expanded their repertoire of EQA including a pilot <strong>European</strong> cytogenetics<br />

scheme, CEQA. Minimum quality guidelines have been published<br />

for cytogenetics and some biochemical analytes. Draft guidelines<br />

for microarrays will be published later this year. In collaboration<br />

with EMQN, best practice meetings will be organised in <strong>2007</strong> for Familial<br />

Breast Cancer, Spinocerebellar Ataxias and Maturity Onset Diabetes<br />

of the Young to generate consensus guidelines. Finally QCMs for<br />

Prader-Willi/Angelman syndromes are being developed and validation<br />

of MLPA, diagnostic CF-testing kits and DNA extraction methods are in<br />

progress through a core group of accredited laboratories with reports<br />

due this year.<br />

P1380. Improving the quality system in our laboratories by<br />

sharing experiences<br />

E. Dequeker 1,2 , S. Berwouts 1,2 , M. Gielis 3,2 , A. Wynants 3,2 , M. A. Morris 4,2 ;<br />

1 KULeuven Centre for Molecular <strong>Genetics</strong>, Leuven, Belgium, 2 EuroGentest,<br />

Leuven, Belgium, 3 MCR, Leuven, Belgium, 4 Medical <strong>Genetics</strong>, Geneva University<br />

Hospitals, Genevea, Switzerland.<br />

Genetic services have considerably increased their activity in the past<br />

few years and quality assurance (QAu) is now essential in order to<br />

minimize potential errors and deficiencies. The introduction of quality<br />

standards in laboratories, and the growing interest in and requirement<br />

for accreditation, has made better understanding of quality management<br />

(QM) and QAu a priority. Consequently the EU project Euro-<br />

Gentest aims to improve and harmonize the overall quality of genetic<br />

services.<br />

In a focus on training and education, key parameters in improving<br />

quality, a series of workshops has been held in 2005 and 2006 to aid<br />

laboratories in their processes of developing QM systems and working<br />

towards accreditation. The subjects varied from living with quality systems<br />

and comparing the different norms for accreditation, to specific<br />

topics like internal audit and IT support for QM.<br />

An interactive approach combining brief expert presentations, case<br />

studies of concrete situations related to quality and group debates to<br />

exchange experiences and opinions form the basis of the workshops.<br />

A specialist in the “human side of change processes” participated actively<br />

in these workshops, helping to overcome the aspect of motivation<br />

and change, which is inevitable when implementing a quality<br />

system.<br />

Approximately 60 different genetic laboratories from 20 different coun-<br />

tries have participated in the first five workshops and <strong>16</strong> laboratories<br />

participated more than once. Tangible outcomes have included criteria<br />

for selecting an appropriate IT programme to support QM systems, a<br />

list of companies providing such software, and a concrete interpretation<br />

of all phases of an internal audit.<br />

P1381. Collaborative Experience of the Romanian Prader Willi<br />

Association with Medical Specialists<br />

M. Puiu1 , D. Dan2 , C. Skrypnyk3 ;<br />

1 2 University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania, Romanian Prader<br />

Willi Association, Zalau, Romania, 3Medical Faculty, Oradea, Romania.<br />

Introduction In the absence of a national governmental strategy for<br />

Rare Diseases (RD), an EU priority for Romania, the collaboration of<br />

local and national NGOs and medical specialists is essential. The aim<br />

of our paper is to focus on the encouragement of a collaborative effort<br />

between Higher Education Medical Universities, medical specialists,<br />

and NGOs serving beneficiaries in the RD sector through a multidisciplinary<br />

approach.<br />

Results Families of children with RD have interacted with medical specialists<br />

and benefited by becoming more assertive and by achieving<br />

more developmental milestones. APWR has established contacts with<br />

a Genetic Lab and renewed the contact with Mauro Baschirotto, Institute<br />

for Rare Diseases and established new relationships with genetics<br />

specialist which helped us to diagnosed the patients in important<br />

genetics Institute and laboratories: Institute of Medical <strong>Genetics</strong> from<br />

Zurich, Institute of <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong>- Wurzburg, Institute of Clinical<br />

<strong>Genetics</strong>, Olgahospital-Stuttgart, Genetic Lab. Organized a training<br />

course for parents, genetic evaluating for children, a training course in<br />

genetics for family doctors, under auspicious of the Medical University,<br />

Timisoara.<br />

Conclusions The health of people with disability and the social integration<br />

can be improved if they have every opportunity to enjoy family life,<br />

education, friendship, access to public facilities and freedom of movement.<br />

Action should be aimed at collaboration between medical specialists,<br />

families, and NGOs. Developing awareness about the needs<br />

of children with RD and engaging public in a shared strategy for the<br />

development of genetic services, will ensure a collaborative international<br />

approach in sharing of expertise and experience.<br />

P1382. Recurrent spontaneous abortion and consanguinity<br />

N. Ghasemi 1 , M. Mosaddegh 2 , M. Abdoli 1 ;<br />

1 Infertility Research and Clinical Centre, Yazd Shahid Sadoughi Medical Sciences<br />

University, Yazd, Islamic Republic of Iran, 2 Yazd Shahid Sadoughi Medical<br />

Sciences University, Yazd, Islamic Republic of Iran.<br />

An expected 15% of clinically established pregnancies abort spontaneously.<br />

When all known causes of fetal losses are ruled out, there<br />

remains a population of women (0.5-1.0%) who have recurrent fetal<br />

losses of unknown etiology. A important part of these recurrent spontaneous<br />

abortions may be due to primarily genetic causes. The significant<br />

characteristic of couples experiencing such fetal losses is the<br />

sharing of alleles between husband and wife. The suggestion developed<br />

here states that the sharing of recessive lethal genes could be<br />

caused by consanguinity. These recessive lethal alleles could not act<br />

alone to cause problem, but they could act with lethal alleles on other<br />

sister chromosome. This means both husband and wife were normal<br />

and usually their family did not have any genetic disorder, but these<br />

fetuses could not live with these alleles.<br />

Present study reports the result of genetic counseling for couples with<br />

recurrent spontaneous abortion in Yazd Infertility Research and Clinical<br />

Centre. The results showed the coefficient of inbreeding of 4% of<br />

these couples was 1/8. In 25% it was 1/<strong>16</strong> and in 14% was 1/32.<br />

Karyotype was normal in 99% and remain 1% had inversion especially<br />

in chromosome 9.<br />

Finding the lethal genes in most of these couples was not possible or<br />

very expensive, because no abnormalities were found in their pedigree.<br />

Abortion causes important psychosomatic problem for mothers,<br />

therefore using assisted reproductive technique such as egg or embryo<br />

donation were recommended in most of these couples especially<br />

after 5 or 6 abortion.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!