30.10.2013 Views

European Human Genetics Conference 2007 June 16 – 19, 2007 ...

European Human Genetics Conference 2007 June 16 – 19, 2007 ...

European Human Genetics Conference 2007 June 16 – 19, 2007 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cancer genetics<br />

Po04. Cancer genetics<br />

P0490. QMPSF : A novel method for detection of 1p<strong>19</strong>q deletions<br />

in gliomas<br />

S. Monnot 1 , D. Fontaine 2 , F. Vandenbos 3 , P. Paquis 2 , J. Michiels 3 , J. Lambert 1 ,<br />

V. Paquis-Flucklinger 1,4 ;<br />

1 Department of Medical <strong>Genetics</strong>, Nice, France, 2 Department of Neurosurgery,<br />

Nice, France, 3 Department of Anatomopathology, Nice, France, 4 UMR CNRS<br />

6543, Medicine School, Nice, France.<br />

Gliomas are the most common primary cerebral malignancies. Deletions<br />

of 1p and <strong>19</strong>q chromosomes have shown to be predictors of<br />

chemotherapeutic response and better survival in oligodendrogliomas.<br />

Different techniques are available for the detection of these alterations<br />

including LOH, FISH and CGH. Despite good concordance exists in<br />

terms of sensitivity and specificity between these methods, all have<br />

specific limitations. The aim of our study was to describe a reliable<br />

novel technique for the detection of 1p/<strong>19</strong>q deletions in gliomas. For<br />

each chromosome arm (1p and <strong>19</strong>q), we devised a multiplex PCR assay<br />

of fluorescent fragments corresponding to exons, which belong to<br />

genes located in the minimal deleted region. A control gene, located<br />

on chromosome 1q or <strong>19</strong>p, is simultaneously amplified in each assay.<br />

PCR products are analysed on an automated sequencer and electropherograms<br />

generated from control and tumor samples are superimposed.<br />

We have searched for 1p/<strong>19</strong>q deletions by LOH and QMPSF<br />

(Quantitative Multiplex PCR of Short Fluorescent fragments) in a series<br />

of 50 patients with a glioma. We found that QMPSF, which does<br />

not require constitutional DNA, is a simple, rapid and reliable method<br />

to detect 1p/<strong>19</strong>q deletions. There was a good concordance with LOH<br />

data in (88% for 1p deletion and in 83% for <strong>19</strong>q deletion). Furthermore,<br />

we show that QMPSF has a higher sensitivity than LOH and allows the<br />

detection of 1p/<strong>19</strong>q duplications.<br />

In conclusion, QMPSF can be routinely used in diagnosis laboratories<br />

for the detection of 1p/<strong>19</strong>q rearrangements in glial tumors.<br />

.<br />

P0491. Amplification of ABL1 gene without BCR/ABL1 fusion in<br />

two children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia<br />

S. Berker Karauzum 1 , Z. Cetin 1 , S. Yakut 1 , G. Tezcan 2 , T. Tulumen 3 , V. Hazar 2 ,<br />

T. Sipahi 3 , G. Luleci 1 ;<br />

1 Department of Medical Biology and <strong>Genetics</strong>, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz<br />

University, ANTALYA, Turkey, 2 Department of Pediatric Haematology and Oncology,<br />

Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, ANTALYA, Turkey, 3 Department<br />

of Pediatric Haematology, Faculty of Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University,<br />

Isparta, Turkey.<br />

The ABL1 proto-oncogene, located on chromosome band 9q34 is the<br />

known translocation partner of the BCR gene on chromosome band<br />

22q11, giving rise to t(9;22)(q34;q11). This is the most common chromosomal<br />

abnormality in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) and adult<br />

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) patients. Otherwise, frequency<br />

of this translocation is only 3-5 % in childhood ALL patients. Amplification<br />

of ABL1 gene is a rare event, that only 7 cases reported in the<br />

literature.<br />

In this study, conventional cytogenetics (CC) and Flourescence In Situ<br />

Hybridization (FISH) studies were performed on two ALL patients. In<br />

the first case, which is a seven-year-old girl, amplification of ABL1<br />

gene, without BCR/ABL1 fusion, was observed in 27% interphase nuclei<br />

in FISH analysis while metaphases were not found in CC. In the<br />

second case which is a ten year old boy, translocation of t(9;15) was<br />

detected in CC and interphase cytogenetic analysis by FISH showed<br />

the presence of the 10% ABL1 gene amplification without t(9;22) translocation.<br />

Our results indicate that, amplification of ABL1 gene without BCR/<br />

ABL1 fusion can be shown by FISH methods. This amplification might<br />

play role in leukomogenesis of pediatric ALL and may be used for disease<br />

monitoring<br />

P0492. Oligo array CGH on 1, 5 and 10 year old FFPE breast<br />

cancer samples<br />

A. De Witte 1 , I. Bukholm 2 , V. Kristensen 3 , A. Borresen-Dale 3 , E. Klok 4 , J. Collins<br />

1 ;<br />

1 Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States, 2 Department of Surgery,<br />

Akershus University Hospital, Nordbyhagen, Norway, 3 Department of <strong>Genetics</strong>,<br />

Institute for Cancer Research, Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Cen-<br />

ter, Montebello and the Faculty of Medicine University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,<br />

4 Kreatech Biotechnology B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.<br />

Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) has<br />

become a powerful technique for studying DNA sequence copy number<br />

changes in breast tumors. The ultimate goal of these efforts is<br />

the identification of genomic markers that correlate with prognosis and<br />

prediction of clinical outcome. For many of these retrospective studies,<br />

formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are the only samples<br />

available. DNA extracted from FFPE tissue can present challenges as<br />

it is often degraded and damaged. In this study, we extracted DNA<br />

from 24 FFPE breast tumor samples (mostly ductal invasive cancers):<br />

ten 1 year, eight 5 year, and six 10 year old. Traditional enzymatic<br />

labeling of degraded DNA samples can decrease the DNA fragment<br />

length still further and moreover can result in the introduction of enzymatic<br />

biases. Therefore, we chose a non-enzymatic labeling method<br />

- the Universal Linkage System (ULS, Kreatech Biotechnology).<br />

Analysis of these samples on Agilent <strong>Human</strong> CGH arrays showed that<br />

the average probe-to-probe log ratio noise (DLRSD) was 0.33 for the<br />

1 and 5 year old FFPE samples, indicating that high quality, reliable<br />

biological data were obtained. While the 10 year old FFPE samples<br />

showed higher average DLRSD values (0.53), the 60 mer probes<br />

still enabled detection of aberrations with a high level of confidence.<br />

Previously known aberrations associated with breast cancer, such as<br />

HER-2 (human epithelial receptor 2), PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol 3kinase)<br />

and CCND1 (cyclin D1) were detected in several samples. We<br />

conclude that the method described here is well suited for analysis of<br />

archival pathology specimens for biomarker discovery.<br />

P0493. Cytogenetic findings in a group of patients with acute<br />

lymphoblastic leukemia<br />

H. G. Karabulut, B. Saglam, T. Tuncalı, N. Y. Kutlay, H. I. Ruhi, K. Yararbas, I.<br />

Akalın, F. Sadeghi, A. Vicdan, A. Tükün;<br />

Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.<br />

Cytogenetic analysis in bone marrow samples of acute lymphoblastic<br />

leukemia (ALL) patients have both pathophysiologic and prognostic<br />

significance. In this retrospective study, we present the results of cytogenetic<br />

analysis of 348 ALL patients (243 children and 105 adults).<br />

Cytogenetic abnormalities were found to be more frequent in adults<br />

than in children, 23,8 % and 13,6 %, respectively. Structural abnormalities<br />

were more frequent than numerical abnormalities in childhood<br />

ALL (61.5 % vs 38.5 %) while numerical abnormalities were observed<br />

more frequently than structural abnormalities in adults (56 % vs 44 %).<br />

Overall, the most frequent cytogenetic abnormality in both childhood<br />

and adult ALL patients was t(9;22)(q34;q11) with a frequency of 12,3<br />

% and 8,2 %, respectively. Monosomy 22 and trisomy 21 was the most<br />

frequent second and third cytogenetic abnormality in childhood ALL,<br />

followed by -7 and +8 at fourth place. On the other hand, - 21 was the<br />

most frequent second cytogenetic abnormality in adults, followed by<br />

-13, -15 and -20 at third place each with equal frequencies.<br />

P0494. Cytogenetics in AML: results of 589 patients<br />

N. Yurur-Kutlay, T. Tuncali, H. G. Karabulut, F. Sadeghi, B. Saglam, I. Akalın,<br />

K. Yararbas, H. Ilgın Ruhi, A. Vicdan, A. Tukun;<br />

Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Department of Medical <strong>Genetics</strong>, Ankara,<br />

Turkey.<br />

The role of cytogenetics in diagnosis and follow-up studies of acute<br />

myeloid leukemia (AML) is now widely recognized. However in contrast<br />

to chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), the cytogenetics of AML<br />

is much more complex. More than 200 different structural and numerical<br />

changes have been found to be recurrent chromosome aberration<br />

in AML.<br />

In this report, cytogenetic findings of 589 AML patients are presented.<br />

Novel translocations, deletions and numerical abnormalities<br />

were found besides of previously defined AML aberrations such as<br />

t(15;17), t(<strong>16</strong>;<strong>16</strong>), t(8;21), del11q, monosomy 7, and trisomy 8. Two<br />

complex, thirteen simple translocations, one inversion and three unbalance<br />

changes t(2;<strong>19</strong>;10)(q21;q13;p11), t(15;17;21)(q24;q23;q21)<br />

and t(1;11)(q32.1;q13.9), t(2;5)(q24.2;p13.3) t(2;21)(q11.2;q11.2)<br />

t(3;5)(q21;q33), t(3;18)(p13;q23) t(3;18)(q21;q23) t(5;22)(p13:p11)<br />

t(8;<strong>19</strong>) (q22;q13) t(9;17)(p11;p13), t(<strong>16</strong>;17)(p13;q21), t(7;17)(q11;p13)<br />

t(8;18)(p23;q21.1), t(12;18)(p11;q11) inv (13)(p12q32) del(2)(q34),<br />

del(2)(q37) dup(2)(q35;qter) respectively, were not reported before<br />

as AML related translocations. Some of these breakpoints were previ-<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!