17.12.2013 Views

EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site

EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site

EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3<br />

= !<br />

Ol<br />

N<br />

O<br />

COMMENTS ON APPENDIX R<br />

people may have died in a single earthquake in Miss mid 100,000 may have died in<br />

ASSESSMENT OF LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE OF WASTE a single cyclone be Bangladesh. Within the short period of a few years after these 3.4.3.1<br />

DISPOSAL SYSTEMS<br />

natural disasters,: farmers we again plowing the fieldr and towns are being rebuilt.<br />

However, If too a naturm disaster also spread high-level radioactive isotopes. and<br />

- created an environment too contaminated to support life for thousands of years, the<br />

N general, this is the most hypothetical epoundus.. Conclusions tie based on analytical<br />

high degree of certainly in the analysis, the long-term predictions ou the effects on man IncMiently feasible, although at rapid ... bly higher cost than the proposed cover,<br />

are merely putting numbers out of the ab. The followlsg comments refer to Append'¢ R: This cost increase might make the geologic dupnsel alternative more competitive<br />

in price with the in-place stabilization slternative.<br />

3.5.5.8 In the tables presenting the performance o1 seen alternative, definition of terms<br />

O.e., Transport Assessment Table) should be added he the text 9. On page R:74 and in Table R.SR, the use of any Impermeable membrane on the<br />

surface of the ground in arid areas has been proven to create increased moisture<br />

3.5.1.27<br />

3.5.5.8 2. A table presenting various health standards should be added. below the membrane due to cepolwy rise and condensation from air moving through<br />

_<br />

the sell This is the experience of highway departments with impermeable paving,<br />

3. who s a Trmmpoit Assessment Table. mining companies with pond liners, end landscapers, with plastic sheeting W areas of<br />

expansive soh. When such so)t moisture u produced, plant roots grow into the area<br />

4. Wiry did thit. appendix not address the performance of the various alternatives in of higher moisture even if they have to Vow .through five membrane or horizontally<br />

terms of the chemical species which may be released from the storage sites?<br />

beneath. it If the proposed impermeable cover over the rsdwaste Is planted with<br />

ahauow-rooted grasses, other deeper-rooted vegetation will eventually establish on<br />

5. At this time, groundwater models cannot be fully developed for the site because of the cover Nemeth natural migration methods... As this new vegetation grows, roots<br />

the high degree of uncertainty in the geology; therefore, groundwater travel times will moveinto the molslwe nollectbg below. the membrane antl eventually move<br />

cannot be accurately predicted ..<br />

Into the waste. For example, the PEGS has documented ounce of alfalfa roots<br />

penetrating into underground mine workings at depths of several bandied feet in<br />

.<br />

6. On pvges R.63, R.90, and R.93, DOB has a tendency to dismiss some Metasteophic" Nevada, because the mines formed the newest water table to Me surface in this<br />

accident scenarios with a statement that "... waste would be a Small factor in the said region.<br />

devastation from a giant metemits," flood,. cohnow, eto. Although obvious Net<br />

such a destructive event would destroy ..in .. men-made atructw. and, 20. On page X66, "5 sere-ft/yr per ale" should be "12.2 acre-ft/,e per acre" end Ne<br />

Pr obably, kill a answer of people, such destruction is temporary and such natural use of the word "erode" in Una 33 . questionable,<br />

events have occurred numerous times throughout history. For example, 200,000<br />

impacts nn life in the region ..old be far water. These state. cats that radiation<br />

3.5.5.8<br />

techniques, which may or may not be valid. As stated ta this appendix, groundwater would be a "small factor" should, therefore, be carefully reevaluated. -<br />

trarsp rt of the contaminants is the most probable sewl. far Me telan of the<br />

contaminants from a disposed site. Yet, there we more unknowns concerning the f . On page R.64, no probabilities are giver, for the nirplane crash scenario. 3.4.3.6<br />

3.5.5.8<br />

3.4.3.1<br />

3.5.6.35<br />

mechanisms involved In the groundwater transport scenario than in any other acentric. - .. ...<br />

As pointed out in Appendix Y, toe construction of s vaOd groundwater model of the 8. On pages R.68 and R-B2, the -W I.ee smbilieelion" alternative most include an<br />

Raiford site u very difficult Even. using ^consorvetive. ions,^ variations in the impenetrable cover to prevent individual maximum mutual doses for the well<br />

hydrogeolrgy make long-term prediction with aa3' certainty very difficult. Without a drilling and excavation scenarios of 1,000 to 100,000 rem/yr. Such e cover is 3.5.1.9<br />

6d<br />

25 26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!