EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site
EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site
EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3<br />
= !<br />
Ol<br />
N<br />
O<br />
COMMENTS ON APPENDIX R<br />
people may have died in a single earthquake in Miss mid 100,000 may have died in<br />
ASSESSMENT OF LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE OF WASTE a single cyclone be Bangladesh. Within the short period of a few years after these 3.4.3.1<br />
DISPOSAL SYSTEMS<br />
natural disasters,: farmers we again plowing the fieldr and towns are being rebuilt.<br />
However, If too a naturm disaster also spread high-level radioactive isotopes. and<br />
- created an environment too contaminated to support life for thousands of years, the<br />
N general, this is the most hypothetical epoundus.. Conclusions tie based on analytical<br />
high degree of certainly in the analysis, the long-term predictions ou the effects on man IncMiently feasible, although at rapid ... bly higher cost than the proposed cover,<br />
are merely putting numbers out of the ab. The followlsg comments refer to Append'¢ R: This cost increase might make the geologic dupnsel alternative more competitive<br />
in price with the in-place stabilization slternative.<br />
3.5.5.8 In the tables presenting the performance o1 seen alternative, definition of terms<br />
O.e., Transport Assessment Table) should be added he the text 9. On page R:74 and in Table R.SR, the use of any Impermeable membrane on the<br />
surface of the ground in arid areas has been proven to create increased moisture<br />
3.5.1.27<br />
3.5.5.8 2. A table presenting various health standards should be added. below the membrane due to cepolwy rise and condensation from air moving through<br />
_<br />
the sell This is the experience of highway departments with impermeable paving,<br />
3. who s a Trmmpoit Assessment Table. mining companies with pond liners, end landscapers, with plastic sheeting W areas of<br />
expansive soh. When such so)t moisture u produced, plant roots grow into the area<br />
4. Wiry did thit. appendix not address the performance of the various alternatives in of higher moisture even if they have to Vow .through five membrane or horizontally<br />
terms of the chemical species which may be released from the storage sites?<br />
beneath. it If the proposed impermeable cover over the rsdwaste Is planted with<br />
ahauow-rooted grasses, other deeper-rooted vegetation will eventually establish on<br />
5. At this time, groundwater models cannot be fully developed for the site because of the cover Nemeth natural migration methods... As this new vegetation grows, roots<br />
the high degree of uncertainty in the geology; therefore, groundwater travel times will moveinto the molslwe nollectbg below. the membrane antl eventually move<br />
cannot be accurately predicted ..<br />
Into the waste. For example, the PEGS has documented ounce of alfalfa roots<br />
penetrating into underground mine workings at depths of several bandied feet in<br />
.<br />
6. On pvges R.63, R.90, and R.93, DOB has a tendency to dismiss some Metasteophic" Nevada, because the mines formed the newest water table to Me surface in this<br />
accident scenarios with a statement that "... waste would be a Small factor in the said region.<br />
devastation from a giant metemits," flood,. cohnow, eto. Although obvious Net<br />
such a destructive event would destroy ..in .. men-made atructw. and, 20. On page X66, "5 sere-ft/yr per ale" should be "12.2 acre-ft/,e per acre" end Ne<br />
Pr obably, kill a answer of people, such destruction is temporary and such natural use of the word "erode" in Una 33 . questionable,<br />
events have occurred numerous times throughout history. For example, 200,000<br />
impacts nn life in the region ..old be far water. These state. cats that radiation<br />
3.5.5.8<br />
techniques, which may or may not be valid. As stated ta this appendix, groundwater would be a "small factor" should, therefore, be carefully reevaluated. -<br />
trarsp rt of the contaminants is the most probable sewl. far Me telan of the<br />
contaminants from a disposed site. Yet, there we more unknowns concerning the f . On page R.64, no probabilities are giver, for the nirplane crash scenario. 3.4.3.6<br />
3.5.5.8<br />
3.4.3.1<br />
3.5.6.35<br />
mechanisms involved In the groundwater transport scenario than in any other acentric. - .. ...<br />
As pointed out in Appendix Y, toe construction of s vaOd groundwater model of the 8. On pages R.68 and R-B2, the -W I.ee smbilieelion" alternative most include an<br />
Raiford site u very difficult Even. using ^consorvetive. ions,^ variations in the impenetrable cover to prevent individual maximum mutual doses for the well<br />
hydrogeolrgy make long-term prediction with aa3' certainty very difficult. Without a drilling and excavation scenarios of 1,000 to 100,000 rem/yr. Such e cover is 3.5.1.9<br />
6d<br />
25 26